Hillary Clinton suggests jailing Americans for posting "misinformation"

I get that. It's an almost impossible situation. How do you protect this speech while making sure you don't destroy it to protect it.

You protect free speech by keeping thugs like Hillary Clinton away from the levers of power.
 
You protect free speech by keeping thugs like Hillary Clinton away from the levers of power.

Not really. You protect free speech by having an electoral system that forces such people to look at people want, rather than go for the money.

Hence why Germany's politicians are way more in tune with the people than US politicians.
 
But liberals always tell me that the internet is so democratic and it should be accessible to all.


:dunno:
 
Not really. You protect free speech by having an electoral system that forces such people to look at people want, rather than go for the money.

Hence why Germany's politicians are way more in tune with the people than US politicians.
What does "in tune" have to do with free speech???
 
What does "in tune" have to do with free speech???

It has a lot to do with it.

You need to protect freedom of speech, but you don't want to go to far, or not enough. How can you do that with politicians who are only in it for the money?
 
It has a lot to do with it.

You need to protect freedom of speech, but you don't want to go to far, or not enough. How can you do that with politicians who are only in it for the money?

If you are depending on politicians to protect your free speech rights, you will be disappointed. Newsom just banned certain memes in California.
 
Not really. You protect free speech by having an electoral system that forces such people to look at people want, rather than go for the money.

Hence why Germany's politicians are way more in tune with the people than US politicians.
The German people did not ask for the immigration policy they have. Also, they are somewhat neutered from the end of WW 2. Even when there was an East Germany under Communism, that was the riches Communist Nation on the planet.
 
If you are depending on politicians to protect your free speech rights, you will be disappointed. Newsom just banned certain memes in California.

And what politics are you looking at? Only the USA... I'm saying the US has a bad system that leads to bad politicians. And you say all politicians are bad because... California which happens to be in the USA
 
And what politics are you looking at? Only the USA... I'm saying the US has a bad system that leads to bad politicians. And you say all politicians are bad because... California which happens to be in the USA

Which politicians are protecting free speech?
 
Which politicians are protecting free speech?
I'm not point to politicians who are protecting free speech more than others. Why? Because it's a difficult topic that you'd have to define how someone is protecting free speech.

For example in the UK some people might find those who are inciting violence on the internet and social media are protected by free speech and others aren't. Some would say they're attacking free speech and others would say they're protecting it.

What I'm saying is with more sensible politics, more sensible politicians, with politicians who have to listen to the people, rather than the money, you're going to get better solutions (or solutions at all) to the problems, like freedom of speech and how to protect it in the modern era
 
Does this Democrat realize the implications of her statements? She's calling for the prosecution of Americans
for political speech. She is a tyrant.


In 2016, aides said HIllary speculated about the possibility doing in Assange. The aides laughed it off until they realized she was serious. This woman certainly seems capable of being another Elizabeth Bathory. Thank goodness she never got the chance.
 
In 2016, aides said she speculated about doing in Assange. The aides laughed it off until they realized she was serious. This woman certainly seems capable of being another Elizabeth Bathory. Thank goodness she never got the chance.

Trump saved us from a real dangerous Leftist.
 
I'm not point to politicians who are protecting free speech more than others. Why? Because it's a difficult topic that you'd have to define how someone is protecting free speech.

For example in the UK some people might find those who are inciting violence on the internet and social media are protected by free speech and others aren't. Some would say they're attacking free speech and others would say they're protecting it.

What I'm saying is with more sensible politics, more sensible politicians, with politicians who have to listen to the people, rather than the money, you're going to get better solutions (or solutions at all) to the problems, like freedom of speech and how to protect it in the modern era

You are putting the cart before the horse. Free speech helps to keep politicians honest. Politicians do not cause free speech.
 
You are putting the cart before the horse. Free speech helps to keep politicians honest. Politicians do not cause free speech.

No, it clearly doesn't. Have you see Trump? And he's just an extreme example.

You need to take a look at other political systems in other countries and understand why they work the way they work.
 

Forum List

Back
Top