LeftofLeft
Diamond Member
- Oct 18, 2011
- 24,596
- 14,816
- 1,405
Hunter’s laptop was Russian Propaganda?Horse dewormer???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hunter’s laptop was Russian Propaganda?Horse dewormer???
I get that. It's an almost impossible situation. How do you protect this speech while making sure you don't destroy it to protect it.
You protect free speech by keeping thugs like Hillary Clinton away from the levers of power.
What does "in tune" have to do with free speech???Not really. You protect free speech by having an electoral system that forces such people to look at people want, rather than go for the money.
Hence why Germany's politicians are way more in tune with the people than US politicians.
What does "in tune" have to do with free speech???
It has a lot to do with it.
You need to protect freedom of speech, but you don't want to go to far, or not enough. How can you do that with politicians who are only in it for the money?
The German people did not ask for the immigration policy they have. Also, they are somewhat neutered from the end of WW 2. Even when there was an East Germany under Communism, that was the riches Communist Nation on the planet.Not really. You protect free speech by having an electoral system that forces such people to look at people want, rather than go for the money.
Hence why Germany's politicians are way more in tune with the people than US politicians.
If you are depending on politicians to protect your free speech rights, you will be disappointed. Newsom just banned certain memes in California.
And what politics are you looking at? Only the USA... I'm saying the US has a bad system that leads to bad politicians. And you say all politicians are bad because... California which happens to be in the USA
I'm not point to politicians who are protecting free speech more than others. Why? Because it's a difficult topic that you'd have to define how someone is protecting free speech.Which politicians are protecting free speech?
Does this Democrat realize the implications of her statements? She's calling for the prosecution of Americans
for political speech. She is a tyrant.
In 2016, aides said she speculated about doing in Assange. The aides laughed it off until they realized she was serious. This woman certainly seems capable of being another Elizabeth Bathory. Thank goodness she never got the chance.
I'm not point to politicians who are protecting free speech more than others. Why? Because it's a difficult topic that you'd have to define how someone is protecting free speech.
For example in the UK some people might find those who are inciting violence on the internet and social media are protected by free speech and others aren't. Some would say they're attacking free speech and others would say they're protecting it.
What I'm saying is with more sensible politics, more sensible politicians, with politicians who have to listen to the people, rather than the money, you're going to get better solutions (or solutions at all) to the problems, like freedom of speech and how to protect it in the modern era
Bullshit.
Let’s see your cankles
You are putting the cart before the horse. Free speech helps to keep politicians honest. Politicians do not cause free speech.