How many deaths are necessary before something should be banned?

If you get them in a corner, they'll slip out. Circular arguments. All of them designed to make sure you don't pass any common sense gun legislation. Yesterday we determined that there was something we could do that would lower the number of gun murders we have in this country every year but because that regulation wasn't a silver bullet that would stop criminals who steal guns, it shouldn't be done. And when we point out this argument is nonsense, they just move on to another point, and eventually back to this one, circle, circle, circle.

I believe besides abortion, this issue is costing Republicans with young people.


None of you retards has ever gotten a single one of us into a corner.

You idiots know nothing, and it shows.
 
Semi auto weapons were far less available in 1960.

And what is “special” about the .556/.223 round is the power it has compared to almost no recoil in the weapons that use it
The 5.56 is not a powerful round

it's a .22 caliber slug with a higher velocity that's all.

My 6.8 mm rifle has barely any more recoil than a 5.56 and is over 20% more powerful and it is still technically a .22 caliber round.



And civilians have been buying semiautos since 1903
 
Right - the only ones constantly making up things are "gun retards" - see 2nd A - where does it state FIREARMS or AMMO??
Wait...
You think 'arms" as the term is used in the 2nd does -not- include firearms or the ammunition for them?
Um...
With that in mind, what weapons do you believe will facilitate a well-regulated militia?
 
A .22 Long Rifle has about a 10 (or less) grain powder load typically.
.223 Remington about 28 grain
That’s almost three times the powder load
Look at you, completely ignorant of the fact the powder charge in a given cartridge cannot be meaningfully compared to the powder charge in another.
Then you know nothing about guns
Unfathomable irony
 
And you are a moron. You could save FAR more lives, easier, by halting the flood of fentanyl.

But no, you and everyone else knows you don't give a shit about saving lives. You only care about power.

And an armed population prevents your abuse of that power.

So, piss off fascist.

Yep.....the democrats can't send their brown shirts, blm and antifa, and now their hamas supporters into the suburbs because that is where the guns are. The democrats have already disarmed the populations in the cities they control, so they can allow blm, antifa and hamas to burn, loot and murder in minority neighborhoods whenever they need them to .......but as we saw with that couple in Missouri and Kyle Rittenhouse......they know that we can still shoot them if they attack us in our homes....

They want to ban and confiscate guns because they can't intimidate the average American with their political violence if that average American can shoot them......
 
If you get them in a corner, they'll slip out. Circular arguments. All of them designed to make sure you don't pass any common sense gun legislation. Yesterday we determined that there was something we could do that would lower the number of gun murders we have in this country every year but because that regulation wasn't a silver bullet that would stop criminals who steal guns, it shouldn't be done. And when we point out this argument is nonsense, they just move on to another point, and eventually back to this one, circle, circle, circle.

I believe besides abortion, this issue is costing Republicans with young people.


You didn't do any such thing....nothing you propose even starts to address actual gun crime or mass public shootings.....because you don't care about those.....you know criminals will get guns with universal background checks, and you need mass public shootings to happen so you don't want to protect schools or other public places........
 
Semi auto weapons were far less available in 1960.
Anyone who wanted one could get one.
Just like today.
And what is “special” about the .556/.223 round is the power it has compared to almost no recoil in the weapons that use it
You don't know this has more to do with the firearm that the "power" of the round - right?
 
If you get them in a corner, they'll slip out. Circular arguments. All of them designed to make sure you don't pass any common sense gun legislation.
There's -zero- sense to be found in gun control laws that violate the constitution, as the constitution - necessarily and intentionally - takes certain policy choices off the table.
 
The idiot doesn;t realize that the actual bullet is what decided the caliber not the powder load.
A .223 bullet is only .003 in in diameter larger than the run of the mill .22
The powder itself has more to do with it than anything - 10gr of powder X can easily generate more velocity from a 40gr bullet than 30gr of powder Y and a 55gr bullet.
 
Last edited:
Anyone who wanted one could get one.
Just like today.

You don't know this has more to do with the firearm that the "power" of the round - right?
It’s both moron but you make a great argument for outlawing manufacturing that weapon
 
Wait until the lefties see this:

1703607600884.png


Introducing the MCX-SPEAR, the civilian version of the U.S. Army’s new XM7 rifle. The MCX-SPEAR is available in 7.62x51 and coming soon in 277 SIG Fury. The next generation has arrived. The MCX-SPEAR by SIG SAUER.

 
Because when I go to the mall or a concert or whatever… fentanyl isn’t going to kill me
when you go to a mall you can be killed by a truck,car, food, falling tree and many other things,,

at some point you have to stop being a pussy and go on with your life,,
 

Forum List

Back
Top