Hunter is 100% the victim of deep state right wing lawfare

[bigrebnc1775]

Tell us how to “tweak” a law, tard.

Now is your time to shine, turd.

I asked you a few post back that you never addressed. What do you call it when you take misdemeanors whose statute of limitations had expired and make them into 42 felonies?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I asked you a few post back that you never addressed. What do you call it when you take misdemeanors whose statute of limitations had expired and make them into 42 felonies?

It’s called the law, dope. The law as it has been. Even before Trump.
What do you call it, tard? Show the changes made.
Try actually reading it.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It’s called the law, dope. The law as it has been. Even before Trump.
What do you call it, tard? Show the changes made.
Try actually reading it.

The law doesn't use supposedly committed crimes that have the statute of limitations expired.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The law doesn't use supposedly committed crimes that have the statute of limitations expired.

There’s your problem.
Not real, tard.
Don’t you think Trump’s team would have argued that? They did not.
Why not read the actual law?

 

[JusticeHammer]

It’s called the law, dope. The law as it has been. Even before Trump.
What do you call it, tard? Show the changes made.
Try actually reading it.

Nope. It's called manipulation. Libscum commie tactics. Scumbag.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

There’s your problem.
Not real, tard.
Don’t you think Trump’s team would have argued that? They did not.
Why not read the actual law?

You're problem is you have no training or experience in the criminal justice system. I know the charges filed against trump were misdemeanors that the statute of limitation had run out.

 

[postman]

I asked you a few post back that you never addressed. What do you call it when you take misdemeanors whose statute of limitations had expired and make them into 42 felonies?

By applying a different section of the penal code.

It would be no different, if someone steals someone's briefcase.
That would be a simple larceny, and based on presumed value, a misdemeanor. But after catching the thief and recovering the briefcase, you discover the guy kept his licensed handgun in his briefcase.
Now you up the misdemeanor, to a felony gun possession charge.

Add to the scenario that they recovered the stolen briefcase after 4 years went by, the 3 year misdemeanor statute of limitations would have run, but not the 5 year gun felony.

 

[postman]

You're problem is you have no training or experience in the criminal justice system. I know the charges filed against trump were misdemeanors that the statute of limitation had run out.

So they looked in the penal code, and found felonies that had not run out.

It's like any other legal enhancement.

 

[Delldude]

So they looked in the penal code, and found felonies that had not run out.

Bullshit...............

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So they looked in the penal code, and found felonies that had not run out.

It's like any other legal enhancement.

One thing Trump's supposed crimes were all misdemeanors

 

[bigrebnc1775]

By applying a different section of the penal code.

It would be no different, if someone steals someone's briefcase.
That would be a simple larceny, and based on presumed value, a misdemeanor. But after catching the thief and recovering the briefcase, you discover the guy kept his licensed handgun in his briefcase.
Now you up the misdemeanor, to a felony gun possession charge.

Add to the scenario that they recovered the stolen briefcase after 4 years went by, the 3 year misdemeanor statute of limitations would have run, but not the 5 year gun felony.

Again all of Trump's supposed crimes were misdemeanors

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Nope. It's called manipulation. Libscum commie tactics. Scumbag.

Show it, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Your problem is you have no training or experience in the criminal justice system. I know the charges filed against trump were misdemeanors that the statute of limitation had run out.

Your problem is that you’re retarded. Bigly.
Trump’s team never argued what you’re suggesting. Why do you think that is?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

By applying a different section of the penal code.

It would be no different, if someone steals someone's briefcase.
That would be a simple larceny, and based on presumed value, a misdemeanor. But after catching the thief and recovering the briefcase, you discover the guy kept his licensed handgun in his briefcase.
Now you up the misdemeanor, to a felony gun possession charge.

Add to the scenario that they recovered the stolen briefcase after 4 years went by, the 3 year misdemeanor statute of limitations would have run, but not the 5 year gun felony.

Don’t waste your time. That one does not possess the required competencies to understand or adjust their thinking.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

One thing Trump's supposed crimes were all misdemeanors

No, dope.
He was charged with and convicted on 34 felony counts.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Your problem is that you’re retarded. Bigly.
Trump’s team never argued what you’re suggesting. Why do you think that is?

Wrong numbnuts

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No, dope.
He was charged with and convicted on 34 felony counts.

Wrong again numbnuts
Do us a favor takes some criminal justice classes get an education in law

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Wrong again numbnuts
Do us a favor takes some criminal justice classes get an education in law

Yikes!
Such a prideful tard.

The indictment:

https://www.manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf

THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, by this indictment, accuses
the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST
DEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:

The Criminal statute charged:

NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov

www.nysenate.gov

SECTION 175.10
Falsifying business records in the first degree
Penal (PEN) CHAPTER 40, PART 3, TITLE K, ARTICLE 175

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

The Conviction:

D.A. Bragg Announces 34-Count Felony Trial Conviction of Donald J. Trump

“Donald Trump is guilty of repeatedly and fraudulently falsifying business records in a scheme to conceal damaging information from American voters during the 2016 presidential election. Over the course of the past several weeks, a jury of 12 every day New Yorkers was presented with overwhelming evi

manhattanda.org

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg, Jr. today announced the all-count trial conviction of DONALD J. TRUMP, 77, for falsifying New York business records in order to conceal his illegal scheme to corrupt the 2016 election. TRUMP was convicted by a New York State Supreme Court jury of 34 counts of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree. He is expected to be sentenced on July 11.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yikes!
Such a prideful tard.

The indictment:

https://www.manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf

THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, by this indictment, accuses
the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST
DEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:

The Criminal statute charged:

NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov

www.nysenate.gov

SECTION 175.10
Falsifying business records in the first degree
Penal (PEN) CHAPTER 40, PART 3, TITLE K, ARTICLE 175

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

The Conviction:

D.A. Bragg Announces 34-Count Felony Trial Conviction of Donald J. Trump

“Donald Trump is guilty of repeatedly and fraudulently falsifying business records in a scheme to conceal damaging information from American voters during the 2016 presidential election. Over the course of the past several weeks, a jury of 12 every day New Yorkers was presented with overwhelming evi

manhattanda.org

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg, Jr. today announced the all-count trial conviction of DONALD J. TRUMP, 77, for falsifying New York business records in order to conceal his illegal scheme to corrupt the 2016 election. TRUMP was convicted by a New York State Supreme Court jury of 34 counts of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree. He is expected to be sentenced on July 11.

You're showing the manipulated BS committed by Bragg.

 

[sartre play]

My guess: to try and sway the jury with their presence.

As far as the charges brought against Hunter, they are valid. He lied on the ATF form. He wrote a book detailing his addiction to illegal drugs. He isn't above the law.

Hunter Biden details lifelong addiction struggle in memoir

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden’s son Hunter details his lifelong struggle with alcoholism and drug abuse in a new memoir, writing that “in the last five years alone, my two-decades-long marriage has dissolved, guns have been put in my face, and at one point I dropped clean off the grid, livin

apnews.com

Not ABOVE the law, deserves punishment for the actual crime. NOT THIS POLITICAL CIRCUS.
ONLY REALLY done to bring his dad down.