I am asking Trump supporters to engage in an intellectual exercise.

[berg80]

From the OP........As Trumpists always do, most of you have chosen to assign bias as the motivating factor behind the verdict........because you must. The only alternative being to acknowledge the jury's finding of sexual abuse for finger cramming in a civil case makes the inveterately lying orange sack of shyte a man who raped a woman.

That statement holds up very well if you change a few words to apply to yesterday's verdict.

As Trumpists always do, most of you have chosen to assign bias as the motivating factor behind the verdict........because you must. The only alternative being to acknowledge the jury's finding of guilt for falsifying documents in pursuit of defrauding the public in a criminal case makes the inveterately lying orange sack of shyte a man who is guilty of election interference.

 

[SeaMajor7]

From the OP........As Trumpists always do, most of you have chosen to assign bias as the motivating factor behind the verdict........because you must. The only alternative being to acknowledge the jury's finding of sexual abuse for finger cramming in a civil case makes the inveterately lying orange sack of shyte a man who raped a woman.

That statement holds up very well if you change a few words to apply to yesterday's verdict.

As Trumpists always do, most of you have chosen to assign bias as the motivating factor behind the verdict........because you must. The only alternative being to acknowledge the jury's finding of guilt for falsifying documents in pursuit of defrauding the public in a criminal case makes the inveterately lying orange sack of shyte a man who is guilty of election interference.

This verdict is ELECTION INTERFERENCE.
Congratulations, you played yourself.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Are you telling us that all judges and jurors are Democrats?

/---/ On this trail, yes. 8 out of 10 New Yorkers are democRATs and hate Trump

 

[Cellblock2429]

Probably not. Although I am not all that concerned with a politician's personal life, unless it points to a lack of character.

This accusation, trial, and judgment, were cooked up by a cadre of Leftist lawyers, then presented in a venue that had the most likely prospect of a judgment against Trump, regardless of the facts.

The accuser, you may recall, could not even pinpoint THE YEAR in which the episode supposedly took place. This is a critical matter (well-known to the aforesaid lawyers), because it is widely known that Trump keeps detailed records of his activities and whereabouts, and if a specific date were mentioned, Trump could easily pull out his records and prove (to any reasonable person) that he was not even in the State when the alleged assault took place.

The judge's later claim that this was "essentially rape" was totally gratuitous and was contrary to all logic and to the jury's findings. To rational humans, "rape" means one thing and one thing only - the old in&out. Clearly this never happened, and IT COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES DESCRIBED. In a department store fitting room? Gimmeafukkinbreak.

Even today it is abundantly clear that Trump can be bent, folded, and mutilated by the NYC court system. It is the American equivalent of a Third World Dictatorship, where the Powers identify the victim, then go about finding a crime for which to convict him. It is certain that Comrade Putin is looking on and laughing his ass off - as he should be.

/---/ From Bloomberg this am:
Donald Trump was last night found guilty on all 34 counts of falsifying business records at his hush-money trial, making him the first former US president to be convicted of crime. What that means voters — and hence markets — is currently unclear. Opinion polls conducted during the trial suggested some might shun Trump if he’s found guilty, but his supporters have rallied around him and a growing number of financial elites are throwing their weight behind the former President.

 

[berg80]

/---/ From Bloomberg this am:
Donald Trump was last night found guilty on all 34 counts of falsifying business records at his hush-money trial, making him the first former US president to be convicted of crime. What that means voters — and hence markets — is currently unclear. Opinion polls conducted during the trial suggested some might shun Trump if he’s found guilty, but his supporters have rallied around him and a growing number of financial elites are throwing their weight behind the former President.

Former President Donald Trump has at least one group of supporters he won’t have to worry about losing even after he was found guilty in his New York criminal hush money trial: Republican megadonors.

“I haven’t heard anybody who gives a s---,” said New York businessman and Republican donor Andy Sabin, when asked whether major GOP contributors he knows care about the verdict in Trump’s trial.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/30/trumps-republican-megadonors-shrug-off-his-guilty-verdict.html

And there you have it. They don't give a sh** if Don is a rapist, a felon, an orchestrator of a coup, a tax cheat, a thief of charitable donations, a multiple adulterer, an incompetent buffoon, a bigot, and someone who consorts with criminals.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Former President Donald Trump has at least one group of supporters he won’t have to worry about losing even after he was found guilty in his New York criminal hush money trial: Republican megadonors.

“I haven’t heard anybody who gives a s---,” said New York businessman and Republican donor Andy Sabin, when asked whether major GOP contributors he knows care about the verdict in Trump’s trial.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/30/trumps-republican-megadonors-shrug-off-his-guilty-verdict.html

And there you have it. They don't give a sh** if Don is a rapist, a felon, an orchestrator of a coup, a tax cheat, a thief of charitable donations, a multiple adulterer, an incompetent buffoon, a bigot, and someone who consorts with criminals.

/----/ Sober up. It's only 7 am EST. That's not what the donor said. He said ( and this is from YOUR post) "care about the verdict in Trump’s trial." Not alleged crimes acutually committed, but a verdict.

 

[justoffal]

The essential facts underlying the question I'm asking are as follows. The jury in the Carroll case found that Trump had committed sexual abuse, which Carroll had accused him of committing. In NY state, only penetration by a penis constitutes rape. But as the judge pointed out, a less technical, more commonplace understanding of rape includes cramming a finger inside a non-consenting person, which was the jury's finding.

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

After Donald Trump was found liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll, his legal team and his defenders lodged a frequent talking point.

Despite Carroll’s claims that Trump had raped her, they noted, the jury stopped short of saying he committed that particular offense. Instead, jurors opted for a second option: sexual abuse.

“This was a rape claim, this was a rape case all along, and the jury rejected that — made other findings,” his lawyer, Joe Tacopina, said outside the courthouse.

A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

As Trumpists always do, most of you have chosen to assign bias as the motivating factor behind the verdict........because you must. The only alternative being to acknowledge the jury's finding of sexual abuse for finger cramming in a civil case makes the inveterately lying orange sack of shyte a man who raped a woman.

So, finally, the question I'd like you to think about is.......................

If a woman who is important in your life had a man force his stubby digit inside her, against her will (the jury's finding), would you vote for that man in a presidential election?

Meh...
Nice try....no one can say for sure whether these things would be happening if Trump was not a POTUS candidate. Those being intellectually honest however can see the very high probability that it would most likely be.....no.

 

[justoffal]

Former President Donald Trump has at least one group of supporters he won’t have to worry about losing even after he was found guilty in his New York criminal hush money trial: Republican megadonors.

“I haven’t heard anybody who gives a s---,” said New York businessman and Republican donor Andy Sabin, when asked whether major GOP contributors he knows care about the verdict in Trump’s trial.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/30/trumps-republican-megadonors-shrug-off-his-guilty-verdict.html

And there you have it. They don't give a sh** if Don is a rapist, a felon, an orchestrator of a coup, a tax cheat, a thief of charitable donations, a multiple adulterer, an incompetent buffoon, a bigot, and someone who consorts with criminals.

No, they don't give a shit about
false trials and misapplied name-calling. As for his personal life he's a boy scout compared to Bill Clinton.

 

[HikerGuy83]

You need to stand up straighter.

You need to post something meaningful.