I Believe I Know What The End Game Is For The Republican Party

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

And what exactly is this "personal disaster & recovery plan"?
Hey, old black woman. You think you can shoot better than me? You can't.
You think you can hunt better than me? You can't.
You think you can fight better than me? No. Sorry.
What's your grand plan here to fuck things up, huh?
America has a plan for leftist shitlords. There may be tar and feathers.
America is not going to stand for commies cheating elections and stomping all over our ancestors'
sacrifices. Or going after us for making prudent choices for our wellbeing.

Seriously, you're speaking to me? LOL

 

[The Duke]

I noticed you said "Trump getting elected". I still don't think he will be serving as POTUS for very long even if he does get elected. I believe Damien will be our next president if VP Harris doesn't get elected.

This is what kept popping into my mind when Vance was debating Walz

View attachment 1036119

What is this drug-addled Stephen King Children of The Corn shit?

 

[Concerned American]

These pea brain Dems will never understand, it's not about Trump. It's about the corrupt Dem party, their lies, their invasion of 15 million illegals, their sky high inflation, their retarded war on fossil fuels, the economy, foreign wars HELLO earth to shit for brain Democrats.

PAY NO ATTENTION TO THAT CRIMINAL IN OFFICE! Bbbut, bbbut, TRUMP.

 

[The Duke]

Seriously, you're speaking to me? LOL

Apparently so. I mean no disrespect.

 

[Concerned American]

Why does Trump need a horde of his supporters to interpret what he meant when he talks?

Why do you not question Harris when she puts out these nonsensical word salads. C'mon, at least make an attempt at being objective and non biased. I realize you are not accustomed to hearing it considering the newscasts that you frequent, but that would be a lot more credible.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Then stop voting. See how easy that was.

When I was a child I didn't understand why there were people in our country willing to kill others to keep them from voting. It's only been in the last decade can I say that I truly understand that the contest for the office of president of the U.S. and who holds the house and the senate is a fight for power and control over the lives of others.

Number 1: I was referring to news sources for all things in our world not just the current election
Number 2: I will always VOTE, God willing, if for no other reason than there are such hateful people who don't want me to. I may not have much or any power or influence in the world but I can deny certain people the pleasure of having kept my vote from counting.

There were three prominent civil rights activists—James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner—who were murdered in 1964 during the "Freedom Summer" voter registration drive in Mississippi. Each came from different backgrounds, but all shared a commitment to fighting racial injustice and promoting voter rights for Black Americans in the South. Here’s a summary of each individual and their contributions:

1. James Chaney​

• Background: Born and raised in Meridian, Mississippi, James Earl Chaney was an African American activist dedicated to the civil rights movement from a young age. He joined the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) and became active in registering Black Americans to vote.
• Role and Legacy: As a local resident, Chaney provided essential knowledge of Mississippi and its community dynamics to his fellow activists. His death at the age of 21 highlighted the dangers that Black Americans faced when challenging the racial status quo in the South.

2. Andrew Goodman​

• Background: Andrew Goodman was a white Jewish college student from New York City. Born in 1943, he grew up in a progressive household and was passionate about social justice. His parents were actively involved in the NAACP and other progressive organizations, which influenced his decision to participate in the Freedom Summer project.
• Role and Legacy: Goodman joined CORE’s voter registration project in Mississippi and was one of the first volunteers to arrive for the Freedom Summer initiative. His murder at age 20, along with his companions, served to bring national attention to the violent resistance to civil rights in the South.

3. Michael Schwerner​

• Background: Michael Schwerner, also known as "Mickey," was a 24-year-old social worker and civil rights activist from New York City. He had a background in sociology and worked with his wife in the civil rights movement, advocating for desegregation and voting rights.
• Role and Legacy: Schwerner was a CORE field organizer and one of the leading figures in the Freedom Summer campaign. He was known for his dedication to equality and willingness to face the dangers inherent in working in Mississippi. His murder, alongside Chaney and Goodman, underscored the risks that activists faced in their work to dismantle segregation.

The Murders and Their Impact​

On June 21, 1964, the three men went missing after being stopped by law enforcement and subsequently released, only to be attacked and killed by members of the Ku Klux Klan. Their bodies were found weeks later, buried in an earthen dam. The brutal murder of these young men highlighted the lethal resistance to the civil rights movement and helped to galvanize public support for federal civil rights legislation. The case brought national attention to the violence faced by civil rights workers in the South and contributed to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Sources​

• "Mississippi Burning Murders" — [FBI](https://vault.fbi.gov/Mississippi%20Burning%20%28MIBURN%29%20/

​

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Apparently so. I mean no disrespect.

Are you sure you mean no disrespect? It sure didn't sound like it to me.

 

[Concerned American]

Okay, who do you trust to provide you with the real news story? I'm open to watching them a while.

I'm genuinely interested in how you all determine what is fact and what is not.

I watch a wide variety of sites and media. I have 3/4 of a century of life experience and education that also helps with my ability to identify misinformation. Bottom line, there isn't an honest word that comes out of any politicians mouth--BAR NONE. When it comes to those situations, I consider the effectiveness of the person who is running. In this election, it is not a question. The current admin has been a disaster--they haven't got a clue and have no respect for the constitution. The past admins' history of accomplishments in spite of an obstructionist congress has made up my mind. As far as what either candidate says--I wouldn't trust anything either one says.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Why do you not question Harris when she puts out these nonsensical word salads. C'mon, at least make an attempt at being objective and non biased. I realize you are not accustomed to hearing it considering the newscasts that you frequent, but that would be a lot more credible.

If you find these sites to be disingenuous and lacking, then tell me which sites you prefer or you believe will give me a more well-rounded reporting of the news. I'm serious.

What about the BBC, Al-Jezeera, should I be looking for news agencies outside of the United States?

 

[para bellum]

I've additionally viewed a video clip of what is reported to be of him simulating performing oral sex on a male.

No, he was having microphone problems. Try watching more than 5 seconds sometime, before buying into some stupid lefty hack's imaginary version...

 

[toobfreak]

So it is apparent to anyone paying attention that Trump has pretty much gone off of the rails. Within the last week he has intimated to his "crew" of supporters that Liz Cheney, the media and others deserve to be shot at.

What a CROCK.

I've additionally viewed a video clip of what is reported to be of him simulating performing oral sex on a male.

Under normal circumstances it would not have to be stated that the things he does and says on a regular basis are not appropriate for an individual who, if elected, would occupy the highest office in the United States. But Trump has set a new standard for just about everything and I couldn't help but wonder why NO ONE is even attempting to rein him in.

The only thing that makes sense to me is that letting him behave this way, in such an abhorrent manner is a part of the plan. Let's say the worse (for us) happens and Trump is reelected. Based on all of his bizarre and aberrant behavior which has exponentially intensified over the last few months, weeks, days & hours even, there might not be any trouble for someone within the Republican party to declare him "unfit' under the 25th amendment to the United States and have JD Vance take over as the new POTUS. They could even use the drama and uncertainly regarding what comes next in connection with his 34 felony convictions for which he has not yet been sentenced, as "too much distraction" for him to fully be able to concentrate and discharge the duties of the office of POTUS as grounds for granting this declaration.

I certainly hope it doesn't come down to this because it means that something absolutely terrible has previously occurred to bring us to this brink, but my mind keeps churning, trying to make sense of why certain things are, even when I'm sleeping.

I for one, will be hoping & praying that this simply doesn't come to pass but it certainly seems workable to me as a Plan B.

tl;dr. I should put you on Ignore for being a nutbag.

 

[IM2]

There are already six or seven threads on this. Why don't you comment on them. BTW, the firing squad BS is simply a lie. I suppose you disagree that the democrats have no trouble sending our youth to war while they insulate themselves from it. That was the point of his remark that you are misrepresenting. Indeed, there hasn't been a democrat POTUS, VP or candidate for either office in the last forty years who have served in the military of this nation. THAT IS A FACT. Please try not to gaslight--it doesn't work anymore.

Democrats have sent no one to war.

What Trump said was clear. And no matter how you try excusing it, he never should have said it.

This shit is getting old. Each time Trump misppeaks and gets called out, it's always a mistake, taken out of context, or we ddn't hear what he really said. We heard him, and we know the context in which it was spoken. We know what his ass meant. For a man who chickened out of combat to say what he did was wrong. Period. And regardess of what he meant, his punk ass put Cheneys life in danger. I don't like Cheney, and in a way she's getting what she deserves for voting for Trump in 2016, supporting his policies 93 percent of the time, and for not voting to impeach his ass the first time, but still, when Trump got shot at, he expected the world to pity his punk ass. Now he's putting others in danger just because tthey oppose him. And again, it doesn't matter what trump meant, because there are disturbed MAGA nuts out there who wouldn't mind standing Cheney in front of a gun.

So it is time the excuses ended. You idiots worship trump as if he is God. No one should not be worshipping anyone like you guys worship Trump. There is something very wrong with you MAGATS.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

I watch a wide variety of sites and media. I have 3/4 of a century of life experience and education that also helps with my ability to identify misinformation. Bottom line, there isn't an honest word that comes out of any politicians mouth--BAR NONE. When it comes to those situations, I consider the effectiveness of the person who is running. In this election, it is not a question. The current admin has been a disaster--they haven't got a clue and have no respect for the constitution. The past admins' history of accomplishments in spite of an obstructionist congress has made up my mind. As far as what either candidate says--I wouldn't trust anything either one says.

Okay, well I'm not going to try to argue any of your points because from my perspective they kind of all do the same things and we're just the pawns they use to get to where they're going.

The thing is, I don't think anyone likes to feel like their only purpose (to those trying to get elected) is for someone to use them and then throw them away, so then it comes down to a matter of "who will I get screwed less by, this candidate or that candidate".

I would vote for anyone before I vote for Trump for very specific reasons but the main reason is because he targets people and groups, many of which, I am a member of. Most normal people, they don't get what they want, it's "oh well" and then they move on. Or they take whatever legal action may be available to them and seek redress that way, but eventually everyone gets to the point where they move on or they become a mass shooter </sarc> if they are unable to lawfully resolve their issues.

But not so with Trump, he's very aggrieved on a multitude of subjects and some of them are not even "real". And by real I mean that in our business you have people who are targeted for things that they have done and/or said, but then there is an additional category of things that they are "perceived" to have done and said.

It's horrible enough to be targeted by one crazy/vengeful person. It's another thing to be targeted by that crazy/vengeful person plus their minions who will extract retribution on his behalf for all of the perceived acts allegedly committed.

And this is ALL before we even get to address this administration's policies and governance.

So you stating that I'm biased against Trump and for Harris is not exactly accurate but not wrong either. I'm not REQUIRED to be unbiased when it comes to making decisions about what's best for my life. The difference though, is I'm not going to come after you or anyone else if I don't get my way or more importantly if I DO get my way and have the upper hand. I can't say the same for Trump and that's what bothers a lot of people, myself particularly.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

What is this drug-addled Stephen King Children of The Corn shit?

LOL, it's the sequel of "The Omen" lol. Come on, I know you saw it

 

[westwall]

About what specifically am I being lied to?

I can no longer take at face value, what I read because of how crazy our world has gotten so when I post, I'm posting on things that the media has brought to my attention, either online on the news sites or during the evening newscast by either Nora O'Donnel or David Muir.

If it's reported by multiple agencies or re-reported by multiple sources and it tracks with what I already know and things that have been predicted, then I feel comfortable accepting this information. If someone specifically states something to be untrue then I will oftentimes research it myself to see what I can find out.

So what methodology do you use to determine if what you're seeing or hearing is truthful?

Trump said that if Cheney were the one doing the fighting, and dying, maybe she wouldn't be such a warhawk.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

No, he was having microphone problems. Try watching more than 5 seconds sometime, before buying into some stupid lefty hack's imaginary version...

If that was Harris would you be saying the same thing?

Or any woman as a matter of fact?

 

[HikerGuy83]

So it is apparent to anyone paying attention that Trump has pretty much gone off of the rails. Within the last week he has intimated to his "crew" of supporters that Liz Cheney, the media and others deserve to be shot at. I've additionally viewed a video clip of what is reported to be of him simulating performing oral sex on a male.

Under normal circumstances it would not have to be stated that the things he does and says on a regular basis are not appropriate for an individual who, if elected, would occupy the highest office in the United States. But Trump has set a new standard for just about everything and I couldn't help but wonder why NO ONE is even attempting to rein him in.

The only thing that makes sense to me is that letting him behave this way, in such an abhorrent manner is a part of the plan. Let's say the worse (for us) happens and Trump is reelected. Based on all of his bizarre and aberrant behavior which has exponentially intensified over the last few months, weeks, days & hours even, there might not be any trouble for someone within the Republican party to declare him "unfit' under the 25th amendment to the United States and have JD Vance take over as the new POTUS. They could even use the drama and uncertainly regarding what comes next in connection with his 34 felony convictions for which he has not yet been sentenced, as "too much distraction" for him to fully be able to concentrate and discharge the duties of the office of POTUS as grounds for granting this declaration.

I certainly hope it doesn't come down to this because it means that something absolutely terrible has previously occurred to bring us to this brink, but my mind keeps churning, trying to make sense of why certain things are, even when I'm sleeping.

I for one, will be hoping & praying that this simply doesn't come to pass but it certainly seems workable to me as a Plan B.

Based on a lie.

But who cares.

Vance will be a good president !!!!

 

[Concerned American]

If you find these sites to be disingenuous and lacking, then tell me which sites you prefer or you believe will give me a more well-rounded reporting of the news. I'm serious.

What about the BBC, Al-Jezeera, should I be looking for news agencies outside of the United States?

Those are two, but I don't stop at left leaning sites either. There is the Wall St. Journal, Fox, Newsmax, Skynews, Epoch News, the constitution, and history books.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Trump said that if Cheney were the one doing the fighting, and dying, maybe she wouldn't be such a warhawk.

I get that, now. But why the need to use such violent imagery?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Based on a lie.

But who cares.

Vance will be a good president !!!!

well you're the first person I've seen acknowledging this so there is that