"I will not be bullied by you."

That's them alright, that's what they think constitutes "discussing politics" there's nothing more to them than that. They are uneducated, inept, angry, scared and excited all rolled into one. The government of the United States has been reduced to a spectator sports game and they are actually pleased with that.

The people who live in the wealthiest nation or earth, enjoy material benefits undreamed of by billions of other people are also angry, scared and bitter. Angry at blacks, angry at Muslims, angry at drag queens, angry at libraries.... They have little to actually complain about in many ways, but just wait, Trump is going to fuck up so badly.
Even the dumbest Republican is smarter than you.

You're a Marxist. You're automatically retarded.
 
The US Senate confirmation hearings seemed chaotic, with members attacking each other rather than engaging in constructive dialogue. I couldn't help but wonder if the chairman took a nap! lol. :)

👉 In the context of U.S. Senate confirmation hearings, there are several informal guidelines and rules that govern the questioning process, although specific rules can vary by committee. Here's a brief overview:

1. Time Limits: Each senator is generally allotted a specific amount of time (usually five minutes) for questioning during each round.

2. Questioning Order: Senators typically question nominees in the order of seniority within the committee, alternating between parties.

3. Relevance: Questions should be relevant to the qualifications, experience, and suitability of the nominee for the position being considered.

4. Decorum: Senators are expected to maintain a level of professionalism and respect during questioning.

5. No Personal Attacks: Questions should not be personal or unrelated to the nominee’s qualifications.

6. Witness Rights: Nominees have the right to respond fully to questions and provide clarifications.

7. Submission of Questions: Senators may submit questions in writing for nominees to answer after the hearing, particularly if time does not permit a thorough response.

8. Public Access: Hearings are generally open to the public and media, with transcripts made available afterward.

9. Confidentiality: Some questions may involve sensitive information, which can lead to closed sessions or classified discussions.

10. Committee Rules: Each Senate committee may have its own specific rules that supplement these general guidelines.

These rules aim to ensure a fair and orderly process while allowing for thorough examination of a nominee's qualifications. :)
 
You hurted hims feewers.
oh-well.gif
 
In an exchange between AG nominee Pam Bondi and Democratic Senator Alex Padilla during her confirmation hearing, Pam Bondi erupted stating "I will not be bullied by you."

Now, here is a textbook case of a male senator bullying a woman, but the left seemingly has no qualms with it. After all she's nothing but a Trump nominee, right? Here is the exchange below:



Why is this okay? And how does this further the public knowledge of her qualifications beyond "we don't like her" or "but Trump nominated her?"

The Democrat "strategy" appears to be demanding a "Yes or No" answer to questions the nominees want to explain more fully and then talking over them loudly to prevent that from happening! What else do they have? I was literally laughing out loud when one of the Dem Senators grilled Bondi about whether she'd weaponize the DOJ...like it hadn't just been weaponized by them!
 

Forum List

Back
Top