If Israel is accused of genocide, how far could it proceed?

1) There is no bloodthirst on the part of Israel, even the government. Civilians are warned to leave before IDF bombs any buildings.

2) Ukraine does not launch any rockets at Russians from civilian homes, buildings, schools, churches, etc sot that the Russians would have to bomb those places as the Russians have been doing from the beginning.

3) Israel is NOT committing any genocide in Gaza. It targets precisely the Hamas fighters who dress up in civilian clothes and use human shields all the time so that the IDF will not target them.

4) South Africa has no case against Israel at all. There is no genocide.
Ask South Africa or any other country to focus any genocide accusations on Russia.
It will never happen.
לֹא תַעֲנֶה בְרֵעֲךָ עֵד שָׁקֶר

So after any area is cleared of all Hamas, and all Arabs & Palestinians, why are the Israelis and Palestinians purposely demolishing civilian housing?

What explains all of the statements from Israeli leaders that have been presented by the South Africans as evidence?
 
Last edited:
So after any area is cleared of all Hamas, and all Arabs & Palestinians, why are the Israelis and Palestinians purposely demolishing civilian housing?

What explains all of the statements from Israeli leaders that have been presented by the South Africans as evidence?

Is this a serious question,

or the goalposts have shifted

to an alleged "genocide" of buildings?
 
Is this a serious question,

or the goalposts have shifted

to an alleged "genocide" of buildings?
לֹא תַעֲנֶה בְרֵעֲךָ עֵד שָׁקֶר

.
Don't gaslight the forum. The rules of ethnic cleansing are clear. Destroying civilian infrastructure and housing that had nothing to do with war, or a terror attack, is a clear indication of intent.

Stop your sinning.


ethnic cleansing​

851000

Ethnic cleansing​


When Ethnic Cleansing is not Genocide: A Critical Appraisal of the ICJ's Ruling in Croatia v. Serbia in relation to Deportation and Population Transfer​


Definition​

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court


Article 7
Crimes Against Humanity
851010
 
1) There is no bloodthirst on the part of Israel, even the government. Civilians are warned to leave before IDF bombs any buildings.

2) Ukraine does not launch any rockets at Russians from civilian homes, buildings, schools, churches, etc sot that the Russians would have to bomb those places as the Russians have been doing from the beginning.

3) Israel is NOT committing any genocide in Gaza. It targets precisely the Hamas fighters who dress up in civilian clothes and use human shields all the time so that the IDF will not target them.

4) South Africa has no case against Israel at all. There is no genocide.
Ask South Africa or any other country to focus any genocide accusations on Russia.
It will never happen.
There it is. Absolute proof once again of how absolutely uninformed many Americans are.
 
Don't gaslight the forum. The rules of ethnic cleansing are clear. Destroying civilian infrastructure and housing that had nothing to do with war, or a terror attack, is a clear indication of intent.
Destroying the tunnels built under civilian infrastructure is inevitably going to take some civilian infrastructure with it.
 
לֹא תַעֲנֶה בְרֵעֲךָ עֵד שָׁקֶר

.
Don't gaslight the forum. The rules of ethnic cleansing are clear. Destroying civilian infrastructure and housing that had nothing to do with war, or a terror attack, is a clear indication of intent.

Stop your sinning.


ethnic cleansing​

851000

Ethnic cleansing​


When Ethnic Cleansing is not Genocide: A Critical Appraisal of the ICJ's Ruling in Croatia v. Serbia in relation to Deportation and Population Transfer​


Definition​

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court


Article 7
Crimes Against Humanity
851010

And the goalposts change again...

Like throwing dirt in a hissyfit because you can't make sense.

F_nB7O_W0AAJ_tp
 
Destroying the tunnels built under civilian infrastructure is inevitably going to take some civilian infrastructure with it.
Yeah like ALL civilian infrastructure. lol.

Israeli apologists for genocide are really amazing in their ignorance.
 
You don't hear Israel saying "from the river to the sea". That would be genocidal intention. From the river to the sea is Hamas' battle cry. It's their stated goal. That's genocide. Fuck those Hamas baby killers.
I have seen video of Israeli politicians and soldiers say things that are much, MUCH worse, TBH. Much of it is evidence in this trial, if you care to go look for it.

Clearly, the only thing you care to listen to, is what is on your TEE VEE. :rolleyes:
 
You don't hear Israel saying "from the river to the sea". That would be genocidal intention. From the river to the sea is Hamas' battle cry. It's their stated goal. That's genocide. Fuck those Hamas baby killers.
You really will believe any shit you're fed, then regurgitate it.

Original Likud Party Platform

'between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty.'
 
There it is. Absolute proof once again of how absolutely uninformed many Americans are.

Israelism | movie | 2023 | Official Trailer​



Jewish Youth Are Indoctrinated From a Young Age in Jewish Day School to Blindly Support Israel and View Palestinians With Contempt​

 
Destroying the tunnels built under civilian infrastructure is inevitably going to take some civilian infrastructure with it.
Sure. . . but flooding them with sea water? So that whole of the land is no longer able to support life? That is unacceptable.



Just as in ancient war, when they used to salt the land, so no one could occupy it for decades, this too, is what they are doing.

It is classified as a war crime. You can't get around this. There are other ways to do this, but they know what they do.
 
Sure. . . but flooding them with sea water? So that whole of the land is no longer able to support life? That is unacceptable.
Your claim is that the purpose of flooding the tunnels was to render the land uninhabitable, as opposed to rooting out Hamas?
 
Look at all those tunnels.

I'm not arguing that there is not significant damage to civilian infrastructure in Gaza. I'm arguing that the INTENT of that damage is not genocide, it is to destroy Hamas' military control.
 

Forum List

Back
Top