If it official, democrats want illegal aliens into the country only for democrat votes

[Votto]

Democrat is nearly boo’ed out of hour-long town hall as voters bash her for supporting SAVE voting rights act​

A Washington state Democrat came under fire during a town hall after backing a bill that would require voters to prove their citizenship when casting a ballot.

On Thursday, U.S. Representative Marie Gluesenkamp Perez walked into a town hall attended by hundreds of her constituents in Vancouver and was met with resounding boos.

Voters were upset she’d voted for the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act and other pieces of legislation.

The second-term congresswoman struggled to speak over the disturbances during the hour-long event, according to KOIN 6.

Attendees told the outlet they wanted their representative to know they were outraged, even though Gluesenkamp Perez had told them the bill wouldn’t pass in the Senate.

“Americans believe that only US citizens should be determining the outcome of American elections. And any idea that I am standing to disenfranchise people is patently false,” the representative said at the meeting.

Anna Brouns, who lives in the congresswoman’s district, said: “I came here to hear what she has to say. Unfortunately, it always sounds like the same thing.”

She said she wants the representative to be angrier than she is and get more done.

“I wish that she would stand stronger and voice more of like, ‘This is what I’m doing. I’m doing x, y, z. I’m talking to the Republicans. I’m trying to get them to shift.’ That would be helpful. Instead of talking about shop class,” Brouns said.

Gluesenkamp Perez reiterated her commitment to “being here and present and available and accountable and trying to have as productive of a conversation as we can.”

The congresswoman was whisked away after the event for security concerns, her team told the TV station.

I'm just glad they did not harm her physically because democrats have become a mob of lawless thugs, but she has to know they won't reelect her for wanting only legal citizens to vote.

 

[konradv]

Democrat is nearly boo’ed out of hour-long town hall as voters bash her for supporting SAVE voting rights act​

A Washington state Democrat came under fire during a town hall after backing a bill that would require voters to prove their citizenship when casting a ballot.

On Thursday, U.S. Representative Marie Gluesenkamp Perez walked into a town hall attended by hundreds of her constituents in Vancouver and was met with resounding boos.

Voters were upset she’d voted for the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act and other pieces of legislation.

The second-term congresswoman struggled to speak over the disturbances during the hour-long event, according to KOIN 6.

Attendees told the outlet they wanted their representative to know they were outraged, even though Gluesenkamp Perez had told them the bill wouldn’t pass in the Senate.

“Americans believe that only US citizens should be determining the outcome of American elections. And any idea that I am standing to disenfranchise people is patently false,” the representative said at the meeting.

Anna Brouns, who lives in the congresswoman’s district, said: “I came here to hear what she has to say. Unfortunately, it always sounds like the same thing.”

She said she wants the representative to be angrier than she is and get more done.

“I wish that she would stand stronger and voice more of like, ‘This is what I’m doing. I’m doing x, y, z. I’m talking to the Republicans. I’m trying to get them to shift.’ That would be helpful. Instead of talking about shop class,” Brouns said.

Gluesenkamp Perez reiterated her commitment to “being here and present and available and accountable and trying to have as productive of a conversation as we can.”

The congresswoman was whisked away after the event for security concerns, her team told the TV station.

I'm just glad they did not harm her physically because democrats have become a mob of lawless thugs, but she has to know they won't reelect her for wanting only legal citizens to vote.

MAGA lies.

 

[pknopp]

I proved I was qualified to vote in 1980. I should not be required to jump through any further hoops to exercise my Constitutionally protected right to vote.

 

[shockedcanadian]

I proved I was qualified to vote in 1980. I should not be required to jump through any further hoops to exercise my Constitutionally protected right to vote.

What if some.Canandian voted and just said that they were you? Is showing I.D as a requirement to choose who wins an election considered "jumping through further hoops"?

 

[1srelluc]

I proved I was qualified to vote in 1980. I should not be required to jump through any further hoops to exercise my Constitutionally protected right to vote.

So, showing proper ID that matches the address on your county's voter rolls is jumping through a hoop?

It took me longer to format this post than it takes to produce my ID, have it checked against the voter rolls, and have them hand me my ballot.

 

[Hollie]

I proved I was qualified to vote in 1980. I should not be required to jump through any further hoops to exercise my Constitutionally protected right to vote.

You see basic election integrity laws as “ further hoops’ because you’re lazy and incompetent.

 

[rightwinger]

Non citizens do not vote

If Republicans could actually find any we would see hundreds of threads on it

 

[Care4all]

Ample laws are already in place to prevent unqualified people from casting their votes, advocates say. Such measures include a requirement for election officials to verify eligibility and citizenship data via the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the Social Security Administration, death data, and U.S. Postal Service change-of-address data, as reported by the Center for American Progress.

Federal law also requires that anyone registering to vote provide either their government-issued driver's license number or the last four digits of their Social Security number to establish voting eligibility.

Here's why married women are concerned about the SAVE Act

The SAVE Act, presented by proponents as a necessary safeguard to elections, could disenfranchise millions of eligible voters, opponents say.

www.usatoday.com

 

[Hollie]

Non citizens do not vote

If Republicans could actually find any we would see hundreds of threads on it

Everyone gets it. Leftists are opposed to election integrity laws because they had presumed their 10 million imported illegals would be a voter base.

 

[Votto]

I proved I was qualified to vote in 1980. I should not be required to jump through any further hoops to exercise my Constitutionally protected right to vote.

So, those running the elections should just recognize you as the guy who showed proof of citizenship in 1980?


WTPHHHUUUUUUUUUUUUKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!

Just more proof that you are not only a Left wing partisan hack, you care nothing about illegal voting in American elections.

 

[Hollie]

Ample laws are already in place to prevent unqualified people from casting their votes, advocates say. Such measures include a requirement for election officials to verify eligibility and citizenship data via the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the Social Security Administration, death data, and U.S. Postal Service change-of-address data, as reported by the Center for American Progress.

Federal law also requires that anyone registering to vote provide either their government-issued driver's license number or the last four digits of their Social Security number to establish voting eligibility.

Here's why married women are concerned about the SAVE Act

The SAVE Act, presented by proponents as a necessary safeguard to elections, could disenfranchise millions of eligible voters, opponents say.

www.usatoday.com

Well, as long as “ advocates say’.

Would those “advocates” be of the democrat version of illegal alien “ advocates”?

 

[rightwinger]

Ample laws are already in place to prevent unqualified people from casting their votes, advocates say. Such measures include a requirement for election officials to verify eligibility and citizenship data via the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the Social Security Administration, death data, and U.S. Postal Service change-of-address data, as reported by the Center for American Progress.

Federal law also requires that anyone registering to vote provide either their government-issued driver's license number or the last four digits of their Social Security number to establish voting eligibility.

Here's why married women are concerned about the SAVE Act

The SAVE Act, presented by proponents as a necessary safeguard to elections, could disenfranchise millions of eligible voters, opponents say.

www.usatoday.com

Republicans want to make it as difficult to vote as possible.
Nitpick documentation
Make people take off work to appear in person
End mail in voting
Reduce voting hours and force long lines

 

[pknopp]

What if some.Canandian voted and just said that they were you? Is showing I.D as a requirement to choose who wins an election considered "jumping through further hoops"?

Truthfully I'm not all that concerned over what a Canadian thinks. I stay out of their laws also.

 

[pknopp]

So, showing proper ID that matches the address on your county's voter rolls is jumping through a hoop?

It took me longer to format this post than it takes to produce my ID, have it checked against the voter rolls, and have them hand me my ballot.

I show a proper ID when I present my voters registration card.

 

[Cellblock2429]

I proved I was qualified to vote in 1980. I should not be required to jump through any further hoops to exercise my Constitutionally protected right to vote.

/---/ So, you wouldn't be upset if someone jumped the line using your name and voted for a MAGA candidate in the next election?
I was a Board of Election inspector in Nassau County, NY, for a few election cycles. It happened more than once. Someone showed up to vote, and their sig line was already filled in. They showed their DL, proving their identity. There was nothing we could do.

 

[Captain Caveman]

I proved I was qualified to vote in 1980. I should not be required to jump through any further hoops to exercise my Constitutionally protected right to vote.

Why do you guys struggle with voting?? In the UK, you have to be eligible to sign up to vote (no foreigners) and when you go to vote, you need ID.

What's wrong with you??

 

[pknopp]

So, those running the elections should just recognize you as the guy who showed proof of citizenship in 1980?


WTPHHHUUUUUUUUUUUUKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!

Just more proof that you are not only a Left wing partisan hack, you care nothing about illegal voting in American elections.

As noted above, when you can prove it happens we can discuss it. I am not interested in taking extra steps to address your conspiracy theories.

 

[pknopp]

/---/ So, you wouldn't be upset if someone jumped the line using your name and voted for a MAGA candidate in the next election?
I was a Board of Election inspector in Nassau County, NY, for a few election cycles. It happened more than once. Someone showed up to vote, and their sig line was already filled in. They showed their DL, proving their identity. There was nothing we could do.

Could be an alien from outer space even, maybe?

 

[Hollie]

Republicans want to make it as difficult to vote as possible.
Nitpick documentation
Make people take off work to appear in person
End mail in voting
Reduce voting hours and force long lines

You poor, dear. Your 10 million imported illegals won’t be the voting block you had intended.

 

[pknopp]

Why do you guys struggle with voting??

You'll have to ask those who do. I've never had a problem.