Norman
Diamond Member
- Sep 24, 2010
- 31,254
- 15,197
- 1,590
Guess what?
Brain surgeons are worth more than fry flippers.
Of course.
No economy could thrive without providing incentives to our most productive innovators. The person who cures cancer should make more money than someone who farts in the bathtub. (This is second grade stuff.)
The choice isn't between Reaganomics, which lifts primarily the wealthy, and communism, which makes everyone poor.
The choice is between Reagan and Eisenhower. In Ike's postwar America the wealthy did just find, but wages, benefits and opportunity were much higher for the bottom 70%. Eisenhower's progressive tax system, infrastructure jobs program and heavy subsidies to education allowed more people to thrive.
Liberals don't want communism. They want a return to the pro middle class policies of the postwar years, a time when the wealthy lived well, but a larger share of economic growth went to hard working families.
Turn off talk radio. You've been lied to.
I agree.
Let's reduce the government back to the post WWII level. Just to be clear, the government was smaller under Eisenhower than it was under Reagan. His government was more "left wing" than Eisenhower's.