🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

'Innuendo And Conspiracy' - This Trump-Russia 'Bombshell' Just Fell Apart

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,149
Another Snowflake / Democrat epic 'Crash & Burn' :p

Yet Another Anonymously Sourced Trump-Russia Story Falls Apart

Yet Another Anonymously Sourced Trump-Russia Story Falls Apart

Once again, a huge Trump-Russia story that relied upon anonymous sources has fallen apart.

NBC News dropped what the network hyped as a “potential bombshell” last week. “Manafort Notes From Russian Meet Contain Cryptic Reference to ‘Donations,'” the
original headline read. The story claimed that Manafort’s notes from the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with White House aide Jared Kushner, Donald Trump Jr. and a Russian lawyer included the word “donations” near a reference to the Republican National Committee.

NBC began walking back the “potential bombshell” almost immediately, issuing a correction the same day ...
But NBC’s corrected story still wasn’t accurate"

Even before Politico fully debunked NBC’s reporting, the network’s decision to publish the story came under fire. The day after NBC originally published the story, The Washington Post’s Erik Wemple
criticized the story, which he said “provides only fodder for innuendo and conspiracy, not for sound conclusions about what happened.”

NBC News’ botched “bombshell” is just the latest anonymously sourced Trump-Russia story to fall apart.


CNN was forced to rewrite a story (FAKE NEWS) in June that claimed that former FBI Director James Comey’s Senate testimony would refute President Trump’s assertion that Comey reassured him three times that he was not under investigation. In fact, Comey confirmed Trump’s account.

Later that month, CNN (FAKE NEWS)
retracted a story (A LIE) that claimed Trump campaign adviser Anthony Scaramucci was under investigation in relation to Congress’ Russia probe. The botched story turned into a public relations nightmare for CNN, and three of the network’s employees ended up "resigning".

A Feb. 14 New York Times story that was widely seen as a bombshell was actually “almost entirely wrong,” Comey said during his Senate testimony, adding that “in the main it was not true.”


upload_2017-9-8_12-23-59.jpeg


 
did anyone even start a thread on the nbc article mentioning donations and the rnc on this site? Was a big deal made about it by liberals?
 
ANOTHER Fake News Liberal Conspiracy Theory Bites the dust....
 
So now it's time to investigate Hillary and Podesta, right? Oh, and Obama's assurances to Putin and what deals he was referring to when he told Putin he could 'cut him better deals after the election'. Those were all while Obama and Hillary were in office, not as private citizens. We need to expand this Russian thing and not let it go, and let Sessions know he has support out here for that.

Democrats started it, after all, so they should be behind seeing it to the end, right?
 
Another Snowflake / Democrat epic 'Crash & Burn' :p

Yet Another Anonymously Sourced Trump-Russia Story Falls Apart

Yet Another Anonymously Sourced Trump-Russia Story Falls Apart

Once again, a huge Trump-Russia story that relied upon anonymous sources has fallen apart.

NBC News dropped what the network hyped as a “potential bombshell” last week. “Manafort Notes From Russian Meet Contain Cryptic Reference to ‘Donations,'” the
original headline read. The story claimed that Manafort’s notes from the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with White House aide Jared Kushner, Donald Trump Jr. and a Russian lawyer included the word “donations” near a reference to the Republican National Committee.

NBC began walking back the “potential bombshell” almost immediately, issuing a correction the same day ...
But NBC’s corrected story still wasn’t accurate"

Even before Politico fully debunked NBC’s reporting, the network’s decision to publish the story came under fire. The day after NBC originally published the story, The Washington Post’s Erik Wemple
criticized the story, which he said “provides only fodder for innuendo and conspiracy, not for sound conclusions about what happened.”

NBC News’ botched “bombshell” is just the latest anonymously sourced Trump-Russia story to fall apart.


CNN was forced to rewrite a story (FAKE NEWS) in June that claimed that former FBI Director James Comey’s Senate testimony would refute President Trump’s assertion that Comey reassured him three times that he was not under investigation. In fact, Comey confirmed Trump’s account.

Later that month, CNN (FAKE NEWS)
retracted a story (A LIE) that claimed Trump campaign adviser Anthony Scaramucci was under investigation in relation to Congress’ Russia probe. The botched story turned into a public relations nightmare for CNN, and three of the network’s employees ended up "resigning".

A Feb. 14 New York Times story that was widely seen as a bombshell was actually “almost entirely wrong,” Comey said during his Senate testimony, adding that “in the main it was not true.”


View attachment 148191



Trump Jr. not under oath yesterday--was in a hearing for 5 solid hours. And Democrats who attended this hearing for some reason now want Trump Jr. in front of an OPEN hearing and under oath---:badgrin:

And you'll notice also that CNN and NBC will retract segments of a story that are not correct, as will the Washington Post & the NYT. And they hate to retract stories so most of the time they will check their original source with two other qualifed sources before it goes into print. So then you can't call it FAKE news. FAKE news come from news sources that don't have to retract anything--like the Drudge report, and Brietbart--and your other favorite right wing news sites.

Now when this all comes crashing down on your head-& it's going too-remember where to point your fingers. The ones that sold Trump to you.

'It is not entirely true that Trump engineered a “hostile takeover” of the GOP, provided that the party is defined more broadly than elected officials and party insiders. As Conor Friedersdorf wrote last year in the Atlantic: “the elements of the party that sent pro-Trump signals to primary voters— Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Bill O'Reilly, Ann Coulter, Rudi Guiliani, Jeff Sessions, Newt Gingrich, Mike Huckabee, Jan Brewer, Rick Scott, Joe Arpaio, Sarah Palin, Ben Carson, Chris Christie, Breitbart.com, The Drudge Report, The New York Post, are simply more powerful, relative to National Review, Mitt Romney, John McCain, and other ‘Trump is unacceptable’ forces, than previously thought.”
The GOP That Failed

conservative-media-cover-edit.png

Donald Trump broke the conservative media

Now their all in full panic spin mode, attacking other media outlets, because they don't want their audiences to know the TRUTH. And you buy into their bullshit every single time.

BTW--FOX NEWS is under a FEDERAL investigation right now for conspiring with the White House to fabricate a story around the death of a DNC staffer, Seth Rich.
Lawsuit: Fox News concocted Seth Rich story with oversight from White House

foxshines.jpg
 
Perhaps Barry should be placed under oath to explain why he went around his own Dept of immigration who had banned Putin's #1 lawyer from entering the US in order to give her a special access visa, why his US AG knew about the meeting and where it was going to be held far enough out to get a warrant to bug the meeting, and why his own personal Russian translator - an ex-FBI Obama loyalists - was planted in the meeting.....
 
Another Snowflake / Democrat epic 'Crash & Burn' :p

Yet Another Anonymously Sourced Trump-Russia Story Falls Apart

Yet Another Anonymously Sourced Trump-Russia Story Falls Apart

Once again, a huge Trump-Russia story that relied upon anonymous sources has fallen apart.

NBC News dropped what the network hyped as a “potential bombshell” last week. “Manafort Notes From Russian Meet Contain Cryptic Reference to ‘Donations,'” the
original headline read. The story claimed that Manafort’s notes from the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with White House aide Jared Kushner, Donald Trump Jr. and a Russian lawyer included the word “donations” near a reference to the Republican National Committee.

NBC began walking back the “potential bombshell” almost immediately, issuing a correction the same day ...
But NBC’s corrected story still wasn’t accurate"

Even before Politico fully debunked NBC’s reporting, the network’s decision to publish the story came under fire. The day after NBC originally published the story, The Washington Post’s Erik Wemple
criticized the story, which he said “provides only fodder for innuendo and conspiracy, not for sound conclusions about what happened.”

NBC News’ botched “bombshell” is just the latest anonymously sourced Trump-Russia story to fall apart.


CNN was forced to rewrite a story (FAKE NEWS) in June that claimed that former FBI Director James Comey’s Senate testimony would refute President Trump’s assertion that Comey reassured him three times that he was not under investigation. In fact, Comey confirmed Trump’s account.

Later that month, CNN (FAKE NEWS)
retracted a story (A LIE) that claimed Trump campaign adviser Anthony Scaramucci was under investigation in relation to Congress’ Russia probe. The botched story turned into a public relations nightmare for CNN, and three of the network’s employees ended up "resigning".

A Feb. 14 New York Times story that was widely seen as a bombshell was actually “almost entirely wrong,” Comey said during his Senate testimony, adding that “in the main it was not true.”


View attachment 148191


Just fell apart??? Was there really ever any substance.
 
Perhaps Barry should be placed under oath to explain why he went around his own Dept of immigration who had banned Putin's #1 lawyer from entering the US in order to give her a special access visa, why his US AG knew about the meeting and where it was going to be held far enough out to get a warrant to bug the meeting, and why his own personal Russian translator - an ex-FBI Obama loyalists - was planted in the meeting.....


Yeah, pretty sure I've already heard enough lies from that clown.
 
Speaking of made up liberal nonsense, whatever happened to the whole recount thing and the millions of dollars liberals collected for the recounts?
 
Speaking of made up liberal nonsense, whatever happened to the whole recount thing and the millions of dollars liberals collected for the recounts?

Bernie skimmed some, Hillary skimmed some, then at the end of the day there was only enough to pay the janitor to take out the trash.
 
ANOTHER Fake News Liberal Conspiracy Theory Bites the dust....

You sure love to call anybody and everybody, "fakes news" (but only those who don't goose-step to Trump World). but you sure run away from your "fakes news" threads when someone points out your hypocrisy on what or who is "fakes news" and what/who isn't. (Goose-steppers for Trump)
Secondly, all these threads about the media's conjecture regarding the Trump investigations or some talking points (also conjecture) a poster uses for a thread, are a waste of time.
I know the Mueller investigation has been leak proof and leaks have been very, very infrequent with the congressional investigations.
Only Mueller's Team Knows What It's Actually Doing
 
Last edited:
ANOTHER Fake News Liberal Conspiracy Theory Bites the dust....

You sure love to call anybody and everybody, "fakes news" (but only those who don't goose-step to Trump World). but you sure run away from your "fakes news" threads when someone points out your hypocrisy on what or who is "fakes news" and what/who isn't. (Goose-steppers for Trump)
Secondly, all these threads about the media's conjecture or some talking points (also conjecture) a poster uses for a thread, are a waste of time.
I know the Mueller investigation has been leak proof and leaks have been very, very infrequent.
Only Mueller's Team Knows What It's Actually Doing
So I point out some facts and you try to attack me using a debunked 'Trump-Russia Collusion' story that has produced no evidence after multiple investigations for over a year?

Bwuhahahaha....

:lmao:
 
ANOTHER Fake News Liberal Conspiracy Theory Bites the dust....

You sure love to call anybody and everybody, "fakes news" (but only those who don't goose-step to Trump World). but you sure run away from your "fakes news" threads when someone points out your hypocrisy on what or who is "fakes news" and what/who isn't. (Goose-steppers for Trump)
Secondly, all these threads about the media's conjecture or some talking points (also conjecture) a poster uses for a thread, are a waste of time.
I know the Mueller investigation has been leak proof and leaks have been very, very infrequent.
Only Mueller's Team Knows What It's Actually Doing
So I point out some facts and you try to attack me using a debunked 'Trump-Russia Collusion' story that has produced no evidence after multiple investigations for over a year?

Bwuhahahaha....

:lmao:

Why not come back to a previous thread that you sprinted away from.
If CNN Was A Supervillain It Would Be Called 'The RETRACTOR' ... Bwuhahaha
 
Why not come back to a previous thread that you sprinted away from.
If CNN Was A Supervillain It Would Be Called 'The RETRACTOR' ... Bwuhahaha

Now you want to distract from this thread by pointing to a thread about CNN's continued Fake News BS? You're all over the place....

Again, So I point out some facts and you try to attack me using a debunked 'Trump-Russia Collusion' story that has produced no evidence after multiple investigations for over a year?

You have NO idea what's going on with the "Trump-Russia Collusion" investigations and neither do any other posters from both sides of the aisle. That is my point.
My other point is that you sure have a habit of running away, when you get proved to be nothing but a right wing political hack. Which is 24/7.
 
You have NO idea what's going on with the "Trump-Russia Collusion" investigations and neither do any other posters from both sides of the aisle. That is my point.
Oh sure we do.

The Democrats have attempted to judicially try their 'case' against Trump since before the election, pushing lie after lie and Conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, committing Espionage / illegally leaking and sharing classified information, illegally unmasking Americans, attempting to acquire fake reports filled with Russian-generated propaganda from foreign operatives, working with Ukraine to get political dirt on Trump and his team....

...and one by one they have been debunked, blown up in their faces, and have exposed only the crimes DEMOCRATS have committed. AS THIS THREAD PROVES / EXPOSES, another liberal Conspiracy Theory bites the dust.

It's AMAZING how liberals, Obama loyalists, and his criminal administration staff could leak all kinds of crap out into the public - again, attempting to hold a public trial of Trump because none of their BS would ever stand up in a real court of law - but how no one has been able to leak one damn piece of evidence against Trump that in any way, in any degree substantiates any of the fake news false accusations that have been made against Trump.

'NO one has any idea what is going on'?
The NY Times, MSNBC, ABC, CBS and most of all CNN and others have PUBLICLY been abused for repeatedly being caught reporting lies and BS.CNN's Cuomo is on Youtube declaring CNN did everything it could to help Hillary win, to include refusing to air any news about her scandals. They have had to offer numerous retractions and fired some of their staff in an attempt to get their credibility back.

Comey admitted he illegally leaked classified information, that Lynch illegally obstructed justice...

Mueller has so many conflicts of interest himself in running this case it's not even funny, and he has assembled the 'Get Trump At Any Cost' Liberal 'Dream Team' consisting of ALL democrats - DNC and Hillary Donors and even a Clinton Lawyer, all with conflicts of interest of their own.

And, again, after over a YEAR of multiple investigations, NO ONE - not 1 Democrat in any of those investigations have been able to provide 1 shred of evidence to support their claims.

'NO ONE KNOWS'? Bwuhahahaha...dude, EVERYONE KNOWS WHAT'S GOING ON!
 
So now it's time to investigate Hillary and Podesta, right? Oh, and Obama's assurances to Putin and what deals he was referring to when he told Putin he could 'cut him better deals after the election'. Those were all while Obama and Hillary were in office, not as private citizens. We need to expand this Russian thing and not let it go, and let Sessions know he has support out here for that.

You tiny mind has strange found the acorn of truth. While they were in office. They were constitutionally in charge. Just like Obama warned russia about interference in the 2016 election, but didn't impose sanctions until "after the election"
 

Forum List

Back
Top