Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would wager that all these stories are hyped and sensationalized.
I must be an isolated example of abuse by an insurance company also. These companies that do this type of thing should have to pay extreme penalties. In Idaho she would be able to sue them for one hundred times the amount of what they were suppose to pay for to begin with and rightfully so. Since so many state legislators have been bought and paid for not to protect their citizens with insurance regulations and stiff penalties it appears the mobsters in charge in DC will do something about it for them while the people cry out for justice. The people are simple enough to think that the DC crew currently in charge is looking out for their best interest when actually they are not.We found an isolated extreme example of something, lets revamp everything to make up for it.
I would wager that all these stories are hyped and sensationalized.
Everything is hyped in the media. I hear horror stories about government run healthcare to, more than private insurance. I am such a horror story.
have you noticed one thing in common here?
they are ALL in California
ever think that might have more to do with it than anything else?
California easily has the most cases but it is happening everywhere across the country.
Of course they are, that's why nobody I personally know has ever known anybody with an extreme situation like what I quoted. Ho hum.
Everything is hyped in the media. I hear horror stories about government run healthcare to, more than private insurance. I am such a horror story.
So because of that you feel that there should be no reform when it comes to the current system?
You're basing your answers with no evidence and rather just what you hope to be true. I have a feeling I could have a hundred links and you'd still be saying the current system is just being "drawn out as a horror story by those bastards in media".
come on, thats pure anecdotal, just because "no one you know" has had it is a poor way to attempt to debate ithave you noticed one thing in common here?
they are ALL in California
ever think that might have more to do with it than anything else?
California easily has the most cases but it is happening everywhere across the country.
Of course they are, that's why nobody I personally know has ever known anybody with an extreme situation like what I quoted. Ho hum.
i didnt say they made a mistake
this is just DUMB
BCBS just screwed up
Yeah...it must have just been a mistake.
I think the patient just misinterpreted what the insurance company had decided.
i said that they screwed up
there is a difference
yeah, thats about iti didnt say they made a mistakeYeah...it must have just been a mistake.
I think the patient just misinterpreted what the insurance company had decided.
i said that they screwed up
there is a difference
So by "screwed up", would you say that the insurance committed malpractice?
Reform is not what Obama is doing, he is taking over. Reform would be getting rid of all the government agencies and regulations then establishing new regulations in place of them. Adding more regulations or turning the power to the government completely is not reform.
Reform is not what Obama is doing, he is taking over. Reform would be getting rid of all the government agencies and regulations then establishing new regulations in place of them. Adding more regulations or turning the power to the government completely is not reform.
This thread has NOTHING to do with Obama. It has to do with the INSURANCE COMPANIES. I'm talking about reform in general, not anything being offered up in Congress currently.
You're avoiding the topic with deflections and I'd ask nicely that you'd stop doing so.
I must be an isolated example of abuse by an insurance company also. These companies that do this type of thing should have to pay extreme penalties. In Idaho she would be able to sue them for one hundred times the amount of what they were suppose to pay for to begin with and rightfully so. Since so many state legislators have been bought and paid for not to protect their citizens with insurance regulations and stiff penalties it appears the mobsters in charge in DC will do something about it for them while the people cry out for justice. The people are simple enough to think that the DC crew currently in charge is looking out for their best interest when actually they are not.We found an isolated extreme example of something, lets revamp everything to make up for it.
Well, we explained to you that no one is against some reform, so what is your point? This isn't common practice, even though the media makes it look like it, and there are laws against it if people are willing to actually do something about it. First, you read the policy and don't sign it unless you agree 100% with it, second when they break the contract you sue them. It's that simple.
Reform is not what Obama is doing, he is taking over. Reform would be getting rid of all the government agencies and regulations then establishing new regulations in place of them. Adding more regulations or turning the power to the government completely is not reform.
This thread has NOTHING to do with Obama. It has to do with the INSURANCE COMPANIES. I'm talking about reform in general, not anything being offered up in Congress currently.
You're avoiding the topic with deflections and I'd ask nicely that you'd stop doing so.
Well, we explained to you that no one is against some reform, so what is your point? This isn't common practice, even though the media makes it look like it, and there are laws against it if people are willing to actually do something about it. First, you read the policy and don't sign it unless you agree 100% with it, second when they break the contract you sue them. It's that simple.
This thread has NOTHING to do with Obama. It has to do with the INSURANCE COMPANIES. I'm talking about reform in general, not anything being offered up in Congress currently.
You're avoiding the topic with deflections and I'd ask nicely that you'd stop doing so.
Well, we explained to you that no one is against some reform, so what is your point? This isn't common practice, even though the media makes it look like it, and there are laws against it if people are willing to actually do something about it. First, you read the policy and don't sign it unless you agree 100% with it, second when they break the contract you sue them. It's that simple.
No, it really isn't that simple. In order to sue, most people would need an attorney. Insurance companies know this, in fact they count on it. As far as reading the policy, most people get what they get from their employer. They haven't read the policy, they probably chose from some bullet points or didn't choose at all and took what was offered.
No, they count on people being lazy, which seems to be a bigger trend in the US lately. You can get an attorney free, and even those "better" attorneys will often not collect unless they win now. If they haven't read the policy before they signed it, then it's their own damned fault, not the company.
No, they count on people being lazy, which seems to be a bigger trend in the US lately. You can get an attorney free, and even those "better" attorneys will often not collect unless they win now. If they haven't read the policy before they signed it, then it's their own damned fault, not the company.
When in doubt, blame the sick and desperate. Nice. Anything else? Going to stomp on some small animals while you're at it to go for the gold?![]()