involuntary relocation

[theHawk]

It just has to suck to be you.

I see. So you too are claiming slaves came here voluntarily.

 

[Curried Goats]

Are you claiming slavery was voluntary?

It certainly wasn't just an involuntary relocation. It's not as if they brought Africans here against their will and that's it. The relocation isn't the end of the story its the beginning.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I see. So you too are claiming slaves came here voluntarily.

How they got here is not the point, it is how they were treated once they did.

You know, back when it was all the rage for Christians to own other human beings and treat them worse than their livestock.

 

[theHawk]

It certainly wasn't just an involuntary relocation. It's not as if they brought Africans here against their will and that's it. The relocation isn't the end of the story its the beginning.

Indeed, who claimed otherwise?

 

[theHawk]

How they got here is not the point, it is how they were treated once they did.

You know, back when it was all the rage for Christians to own other human beings and treat them worse than their livestock.

What percentage of Christians owned another human being?

 

[Correll]

Indeed, who claimed otherwise?

Lefties really, really anticipate a lot. To the point that they just assume shit, make it up in their heads and then respond to you as though you said it.


Good luck getting them to admit it.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Hmmm how about involuntary job acquisition.

Comes with free meals, no rent to pay, and an occasional work effort adjusting.

 

[Curried Goats]

Indeed, who claimed otherwise?

Do you not know how to read you dumb fuck? It was me pointing out that involuntary relocation does not cover the breadth of slavery. If you agree with me then you think calling slavery, involuntary relocation is some bullshit terminology for safe space needing mother fuckers. Which one are you?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

What percentage of Christians owned another human being?

Too many

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Funny you folks always forget to mention those who did make slavery acceptable. The same Africans that sold fellow Africans for thousands of years.

And the racist right is actually trying to defend this reprehensible policy.

 

[surada]

The age group mentioned seems a bit too young.

I agree. Second grade is too early to teach about slavery.

 

[theHawk]

Too many

Ahhh, the old “I can’t say because it would be a self own moment” response.

 

[g5000]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/slavery-history-virginia-textbook/2020/07/31/d8571eda-d1f0-11ea-8c55-61e7fa5e82ab_story.html

A series of textbooks written for the fourth, seventh and 11th grades taught a generation of Virginians our state’s history. Chapter 29 of the seventh-grade edition, titled “How the Negroes Lived Under Slavery,” included these sentences: “A feeling of strong affection existed between masters and slaves in a majority of Virginia homes.” The masters “knew the best way to control their slaves was to win their confidence and affection.” Enslaved people “went visiting at night and sometimes owned guns and other weapons.” “It cannot be denied that some slaves were treated badly, but most were treated with kindness.” Color illustrations featured masters and slaves all dressed smartly, shaking hands amiably.

 

[g5000]

A well-dressed Black family is cordially greeted by a white man—presumably their enslaver—in this fanciful illustration above the chapter title,"How the Negroes lived under Slavery." Given that the family was arriving via a sailing ship, the reality is that they had probably been recently sold at auction, forcibly transported by boat while being closely guarded, and then delivered to their new "owner." This illustrated page is from Virginia: History, Government, Geography (1957), the state-sanctioned seventh-grade history textbook that was written with the express intention of presenting a Lost Cause view of slavery as a benign institution.

 

[blackhawk]

About as dumb as some school districts wanting to teach gender studies to 2nd graders or critical race theory stupid is not bound to any one political party or ideology.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Next the racist right will try to make the rape of enslaved women acceptable.

You mean like how the left lionizes Thomas Jefferson?

 

[Curried Goats]

Ahhh, the old “I can’t say because it would be a self own moment” response.

Are really trying to comment on someone else as you hide from mine you little bitch?

 

[Rogue AI]

And the racist right is actually trying to defend this reprehensible policy.

What policy is that? What I see is incorporation of PC terms towards slavery. That's not policy.

 

[theHawk]

Do you not know how to read you dumb fuck? It was me pointing out that involuntary relocation does not cover the breadth of slavery. If you agree with me then you think calling slavery, involuntary relocation is some bullshit terminology for safe space needing mother fuckers. Which one are you?

Whoever claimed that ”involuntary relocation” would cover the breadth of slavery?

Show us the full text.

 

[Curried Goats]

Whoever claimed that ”involuntary relocation” would cover the breadth of slavery?

Show us the full text.

The cucks in Texas who suggested replacing the world slavery, with involuntary relocation you dumb fuck. What do you think this thread is about?