Ironclad Proof of Upcoming Fraud in Michigan: 53 Counties Have More Active Registered Voters Than Voting-Age Population, Including Detroit

munkle

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2012
4,817
8,130
2,130
Anybody can buy the DVD of registered active and inactive voters in Michigan or any other state and count for themselves. The number of actual qualified, voting age adults is likely to be even lower because "voting age adults" also counts legal and illegal adults who were counted by the US census.


It is already unheard of for a county to have 100% of voting-age residents even registered to vote, much less be listed as active voters. In a lawsuit filed by the Republican National Committee against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson in March 2024, 53 counties in Michigan have more active registered voters than they do voting age population.

The average state has an inactive registered voter rate of about 10 percent, with some states running as high as 20 percent.

Michigan is a vital do-or-die swing state in the 2024 presidential election.

The counties according to the complaint are:

Alcona (112%), Allegan (104%), Alpena (101%),
Antrim (111%), Arenac (104%), Barry (102%), Benzie (108%), Berrien (102%), Calhoun (101%), Cass (101%), Charlevoix (105%), Cheboygan (104%), Crawford, (110%), Delta (104%), Dickinson (100%), Emmet (104%), Genesee (104%), Gladwin, (103%), Gogebic (101%), Grand Traverse (101%), Huron (100%), Iosco (104%), Iron (106%), Kalkaska (115%), Kent (100%), Keweenaw (114%), Lapeer (102%), Leelanau
(108%), Livingston (102%), Mackinac (114%), Macomb (101%), Mason (104%), Menominee (101%), Missaukee (106%), Monroe (100%), Montmorency (110%), Muskegon (101%), Newaygo (103%), Oakland (101%), Oceana (105%), Ogemaw (106%), Ontonagon (101%), Osceola (101%), Oscoda (110%), Otsego (111%), Presque Isle (107%), Roscommon (110%), Schoolcraft (107%), Shiawassee (102%), St. Clair
(102%), Van Buren (104%), Wayne (101%), and Wexford (105%).

Michigan registered voter lists, as is traditional in all states, are available on DVD.

The huge vote pool of Wayne County, which Detroit is located in, shows 101% of its voting-age population as an active, registered voters.

Compliant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, JORDAN JORRITSMA, and EMERSON SILVERNAIL v.
JOCELYN BENSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00262


In an attempted June 2024 “fact check” designed to rebut the allegation, USA Today responds:

“Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson called it a “PR campaign masquerading as a meritless lawsuit.” A similar lawsuit was dismissed in March.”

This is no “debunk” whatsoever, since the assertion of one of the sued parties that the allegations are false is not a refutation.

MI is where Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson directed election workers to “presume” all signatures on mail-in ballots were valid in 2020, an order which was struck down by Michigan courts. Nevertheless, Benson has just ignored the ruling and issued the same guidance again for 2024. So now election workers following the guidance could be criminally liable for breaking the law.

Detroit News:

“Before the 2020 election, Benson directed local clerks to presume the signatures on absentee ballot applications and ballots were valid and to further accept the signatures as valid if they contained “any redeeming qualities.”

”The Center for Election Confidence fought this attempt to change, last-minute, Michigan’s election law. The Michigan courts agreed later that the guidance was invalid. Despite this, the Benson issued the same direction again to local clerks for the 2024 election, contrary to previous court rulings and in violation of state law. The RNC has brought suit, seeking to enforce the law and previous court rulings. “”
 
Let's see what our resident leftard fools have to say about this.

Our country is going to hell in a hand basket, and Democrats are to blame, and they don't care.
 

Ironclad Proof of Upcoming Fraud in Michigan: 53 Counties Have More Active Registered Voters Than Voting-Age Population, Including Detroit.​


Exactly like they did in 2020


1725750289256.png

 
Anybody can buy the DVD of registered active and inactive voters in Michigan or any other state and count for themselves. The number of actual qualified, voting age adults is likely to be even lower because "voting age adults" also counts legal and illegal adults who were counted by the US census.


It is already unheard of for a county to have 100% of voting-age residents even registered to vote, much less be listed as active voters. In a lawsuit filed by the Republican National Committee against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson in March 2024, 53 counties in Michigan have more active registered voters than they do voting age population.

The average state has an inactive registered voter rate of about 10 percent, with some states running as high as 20 percent.

Michigan is a vital do-or-die swing state in the 2024 presidential election.

The counties according to the complaint are:

Alcona (112%), Allegan (104%), Alpena (101%),
Antrim (111%), Arenac (104%), Barry (102%), Benzie (108%), Berrien (102%), Calhoun (101%), Cass (101%), Charlevoix (105%), Cheboygan (104%), Crawford, (110%), Delta (104%), Dickinson (100%), Emmet (104%), Genesee (104%), Gladwin, (103%), Gogebic (101%), Grand Traverse (101%), Huron (100%), Iosco (104%), Iron (106%), Kalkaska (115%), Kent (100%), Keweenaw (114%), Lapeer (102%), Leelanau
(108%), Livingston (102%), Mackinac (114%), Macomb (101%), Mason (104%), Menominee (101%), Missaukee (106%), Monroe (100%), Montmorency (110%), Muskegon (101%), Newaygo (103%), Oakland (101%), Oceana (105%), Ogemaw (106%), Ontonagon (101%), Osceola (101%), Oscoda (110%), Otsego (111%), Presque Isle (107%), Roscommon (110%), Schoolcraft (107%), Shiawassee (102%), St. Clair
(102%), Van Buren (104%), Wayne (101%), and Wexford (105%).

Michigan registered voter lists, as is traditional in all states, are available on DVD.

The huge vote pool of Wayne County, which Detroit is located in, shows 101% of its voting-age population as an active, registered voters.

Compliant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, JORDAN JORRITSMA, and EMERSON SILVERNAIL v.
JOCELYN BENSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00262


In an attempted June 2024 “fact check” designed to rebut the allegation, USA Today responds:

“Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson called it a “PR campaign masquerading as a meritless lawsuit.” A similar lawsuit was dismissed in March.”

This is no “debunk” whatsoever, since the assertion of one of the sued parties that the allegations are false is not a refutation.

MI is where Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson directed election workers to “presume” all signatures on mail-in ballots were valid in 2020, an order which was struck down by Michigan courts. Nevertheless, Benson has just ignored the ruling and issued the same guidance again for 2024. So now election workers following the guidance could be criminally liable for breaking the law.

Detroit News:

“Before the 2020 election, Benson directed local clerks to presume the signatures on absentee ballot applications and ballots were valid and to further accept the signatures as valid if they contained “any redeeming qualities.”

”The Center for Election Confidence fought this attempt to change, last-minute, Michigan’s election law. The Michigan courts agreed later that the guidance was invalid. Despite this, the Benson issued the same direction again to local clerks for the 2024 election, contrary to previous court rulings and in violation of state law. The RNC has brought suit, seeking to enforce the law and previous court rulings. “”
Thankfully the RNC is suing in advance of the Cheating
 
GBI industries was operating in at least 7 states prior to 2020 paying criminals to fill out tens of thousands fraudulent registrations each. Most of those sailed right thru (signed by the same person in most stacks) the broken state system and lazy pension chasing state workers.//
 
Anybody can buy the DVD of registered active and inactive voters in Michigan or any other state and count for themselves. The number of actual qualified, voting age adults is likely to be even lower because "voting age adults" also counts legal and illegal adults who were counted by the US census.


It is already unheard of for a county to have 100% of voting-age residents even registered to vote, much less be listed as active voters. In a lawsuit filed by the Republican National Committee against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson in March 2024, 53 counties in Michigan have more active registered voters than they do voting age population.

The average state has an inactive registered voter rate of about 10 percent, with some states running as high as 20 percent.

Michigan is a vital do-or-die swing state in the 2024 presidential election.

The counties according to the complaint are:

Alcona (112%), Allegan (104%), Alpena (101%),
Antrim (111%), Arenac (104%), Barry (102%), Benzie (108%), Berrien (102%), Calhoun (101%), Cass (101%), Charlevoix (105%), Cheboygan (104%), Crawford, (110%), Delta (104%), Dickinson (100%), Emmet (104%), Genesee (104%), Gladwin, (103%), Gogebic (101%), Grand Traverse (101%), Huron (100%), Iosco (104%), Iron (106%), Kalkaska (115%), Kent (100%), Keweenaw (114%), Lapeer (102%), Leelanau
(108%), Livingston (102%), Mackinac (114%), Macomb (101%), Mason (104%), Menominee (101%), Missaukee (106%), Monroe (100%), Montmorency (110%), Muskegon (101%), Newaygo (103%), Oakland (101%), Oceana (105%), Ogemaw (106%), Ontonagon (101%), Osceola (101%), Oscoda (110%), Otsego (111%), Presque Isle (107%), Roscommon (110%), Schoolcraft (107%), Shiawassee (102%), St. Clair
(102%), Van Buren (104%), Wayne (101%), and Wexford (105%).

Michigan registered voter lists, as is traditional in all states, are available on DVD.

The huge vote pool of Wayne County, which Detroit is located in, shows 101% of its voting-age population as an active, registered voters.

Compliant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, JORDAN JORRITSMA, and EMERSON SILVERNAIL v.
JOCELYN BENSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00262


In an attempted June 2024 “fact check” designed to rebut the allegation, USA Today responds:

“Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson called it a “PR campaign masquerading as a meritless lawsuit.” A similar lawsuit was dismissed in March.”

This is no “debunk” whatsoever, since the assertion of one of the sued parties that the allegations are false is not a refutation.

MI is where Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson directed election workers to “presume” all signatures on mail-in ballots were valid in 2020, an order which was struck down by Michigan courts. Nevertheless, Benson has just ignored the ruling and issued the same guidance again for 2024. So now election workers following the guidance could be criminally liable for breaking the law.

Detroit News:

“Before the 2020 election, Benson directed local clerks to presume the signatures on absentee ballot applications and ballots were valid and to further accept the signatures as valid if they contained “any redeeming qualities.”

”The Center for Election Confidence fought this attempt to change, last-minute, Michigan’s election law. The Michigan courts agreed later that the guidance was invalid. Despite this, the Benson issued the same direction again to local clerks for the 2024 election, contrary to previous court rulings and in violation of state law. The RNC has brought suit, seeking to enforce the law and previous court rulings. “”

How reliable is Corona News?
 
Not to mention the spiking expat registration numbers in the multiple tens of thousands in battleground states. The democrats are not done manipulating the fair election of our leaders. Democrats are scum.
 
Anybody can buy the DVD of registered active and inactive voters in Michigan or any other state and count for themselves. The number of actual qualified, voting age adults is likely to be even lower because "voting age adults" also counts legal and illegal adults who were counted by the US census.


It is already unheard of for a county to have 100% of voting-age residents even registered to vote, much less be listed as active voters. In a lawsuit filed by the Republican National Committee against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson in March 2024, 53 counties in Michigan have more active registered voters than they do voting age population.

The average state has an inactive registered voter rate of about 10 percent, with some states running as high as 20 percent.

Michigan is a vital do-or-die swing state in the 2024 presidential election.

The counties according to the complaint are:

Alcona (112%), Allegan (104%), Alpena (101%),
Antrim (111%), Arenac (104%), Barry (102%), Benzie (108%), Berrien (102%), Calhoun (101%), Cass (101%), Charlevoix (105%), Cheboygan (104%), Crawford, (110%), Delta (104%), Dickinson (100%), Emmet (104%), Genesee (104%), Gladwin, (103%), Gogebic (101%), Grand Traverse (101%), Huron (100%), Iosco (104%), Iron (106%), Kalkaska (115%), Kent (100%), Keweenaw (114%), Lapeer (102%), Leelanau
(108%), Livingston (102%), Mackinac (114%), Macomb (101%), Mason (104%), Menominee (101%), Missaukee (106%), Monroe (100%), Montmorency (110%), Muskegon (101%), Newaygo (103%), Oakland (101%), Oceana (105%), Ogemaw (106%), Ontonagon (101%), Osceola (101%), Oscoda (110%), Otsego (111%), Presque Isle (107%), Roscommon (110%), Schoolcraft (107%), Shiawassee (102%), St. Clair
(102%), Van Buren (104%), Wayne (101%), and Wexford (105%).

Michigan registered voter lists, as is traditional in all states, are available on DVD.

The huge vote pool of Wayne County, which Detroit is located in, shows 101% of its voting-age population as an active, registered voters.

Compliant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, JORDAN JORRITSMA, and EMERSON SILVERNAIL v.
JOCELYN BENSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00262


In an attempted June 2024 “fact check” designed to rebut the allegation, USA Today responds:

“Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson called it a “PR campaign masquerading as a meritless lawsuit.” A similar lawsuit was dismissed in March.”

This is no “debunk” whatsoever, since the assertion of one of the sued parties that the allegations are false is not a refutation.

MI is where Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson directed election workers to “presume” all signatures on mail-in ballots were valid in 2020, an order which was struck down by Michigan courts. Nevertheless, Benson has just ignored the ruling and issued the same guidance again for 2024. So now election workers following the guidance could be criminally liable for breaking the law.

Detroit News:

“Before the 2020 election, Benson directed local clerks to presume the signatures on absentee ballot applications and ballots were valid and to further accept the signatures as valid if they contained “any redeeming qualities.”

”The Center for Election Confidence fought this attempt to change, last-minute, Michigan’s election law. The Michigan courts agreed later that the guidance was invalid. Despite this, the Benson issued the same direction again to local clerks for the 2024 election, contrary to previous court rulings and in violation of state law. The RNC has brought suit, seeking to enforce the law and previous court rulings. “”

The League of Women Voters of Michigan moved to intervene as a defendant in a lawsuit in which plaintiffs allege that Michigan and most of its counties have not purged voters aggressively enough.

PUBLISHED: April 4, 2024
In Republican National Committee, et al. v. Benson, et al., the Republican National Committee (RNC) and two Michigan voters sued the Michigan Secretary of State and Elections Director alleging that most counties in the state have voter registration rates that are too high and therefore the Secretary and Elections Director must purge the rolls more aggressively. On April 4, 2024, the League of Women Voters of Michigan requested permission to intervene as a defendant, represented by the Brennan Center and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP.

Background​

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) was enacted to increase voter participation and protect our elections. Under the NVRA, election administrators are required to conduct reasonable voter list maintenance that includes safeguards to ensure eligible voters are not accidentally removed from the rolls. Such safeguards include the requirement that systematic list maintenance not be conducted within 90 days of an election; that list maintenance programs be reasonable, uniform, and nondiscriminatory; and that voters be removed due to suspected change of address only after they are sent a notice that they are going to be removed, fail to respond, and fail to vote in two consecutive federal elections.
Voter list maintenance – when done responsibly – is appropriate and necessary for election administration. But removing voters without adequate protections violates federal law and can lead to disenfranchisement. When voter purges are rushed, based on unreliable data, or done without essential precautions or enough public notice, voters bear the greatest burden – potentially arriving at the polls only to discover they have been removed from the rolls and are unable to cast an ordinary ballot.
On March 13, 2024, the RNC and two Michigan voters initiated a lawsuit against Michigan’s Secretary of State and Elections Director alleging that they have not maintained accurate voter rolls.
On April 4, 2024, the League of Women Voters of Michigan requested permission to intervene in the case. The League argues that plaintiffs seek to apply an unreasonable standard for voter list maintenance, jurisdictions should not be required to purge voters based on unsubstantiated and unsolicited data provided by third parties, and eligible voters will likely be removed from the rolls if the state complies with plaintiffs’ request.

Context​

This case follows on a multi-year, national effort by activist groups using exaggerated claims to pressure jurisdictions around the country to use aggressive purge practices. The allegations are almost identical to two cases from 2020 in which the Michigan League of Women Voters, represented by the Brennan Center and Paul, Weiss, successfully intervened. In the first, the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) alleged that the city of Detroit was failing to purge voters aggressively enough. After our intervention, PILF dropped the case. In the second, Anthony Daunt – an activist backed by the conservative Honest Elections Project – claimed the state and 16 counties were not purging voters aggressively enough. Again, plaintiff dismissed his case after we intervened.
In 2021, PILF brought a separate suit alleging that Michigan was failing to purge its rolls of dead voters. A federal court dismissed the case on March 1, 2024, finding the state’s list maintenance satisfied federal law; PILF has since appealed.
Michigan is not the only state seeing these types of lawsuits. The RNC brought a substantially similar case to this one in Nevada and is reportedly plotting an aggressive litigation strategy ahead of the 2024 general election. Election denier groups called Maryland Election Integrity and United Sovereign Americans, meanwhile, have filed a suit asking for aggressive purges and questioning other legitimate methods of election administration in Maryland. United Sovereign Americans is allegedly planning to bring “many suits” across the country.
 

Forum List

Back
Top