Is Chat GPT wrong if it is sometimes left and sometimes woke?

[catatomic]

First of all, AI is amazing at religion. Religion tends to be right-wing and science left-wing. Neither is superior.


What can you demonstrate that it is wrong about, even if it is sometimes left or sometimes woke?


You want to bet that if the political parties cross over on some issue it will change accordingly?


With woke, it just somehow cares about lives. As a schizoprhenic paranoid type, I know that I have limitations.

 

[Stryder50]

GIGO
Garbage In - Garbage Out

Chat GPT regurgitates what it's programmers feed it. Most of them seem to have been Left leaning and hence Chat GPT has a Left-leaning bias most of the time. Strongly!

What is wrong about Left-Wing and Woke is that it is not Right.

Woke does not care about lives since it advocates for economic implosion and focuses on greed of the non-productive, non-profitable.

 

[catatomic]

GIGO
Garbage In - Garbage Out

Chat GPT regurgitates what it's programmers feed it. Most of them seem to have been Left leaning and hence Chat GPT has a Left-leaning bias most of the time. Strongly!

What is wrong about Left-Wing and Woke is that it is not Right.

Woke does not care about lives since it advocates for economic implosion and focuses on greed of the non-productive, non-profitable.

Thou Shalt Not Kill.

I asked what Republican issues Chat GPT held and it had its usual long list.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

First of all, AI is amazing at religion. Religion tends to be right-wing and science left-wing. Neither is superior.


What can you demonstrate that it is wrong about, even if it is sometimes left or sometimes woke?


You want to bet that if the political parties cross over on some issue it will change accordingly?


With woke, it just somehow cares about lives. As a schizoprhenic paranoid type, I know that I have limitations.

Maybe you should try asking it for the same information but several different ways to see which one produces the results you like best.

And just always remember it can get things wrong at times, so it's useful to engage it on topics you're fairly familiar with or to fact-check some of the things it tells you that you don't have first hand knowledge of.

 

[catatomic]

Thou Shalt Not Kill.

I asked what Republican issues Chat GPT held and it had its usual long list.

That's not Fake News. It did have its usual long list.

 

[catatomic]

Maybe you should try asking it for the same information but several different ways to see which one produces the results you like best.

And just always remember it can get things wrong at times, so it's useful to engage it on topics you're fairly familiar with or to fact-check some of the things it tells you that you don't have first hand knowledge of.

I've used it thoroughly. It might report differently when you ask from different angles but I have not seen conrtradiction.

 

[kyzr]

I've used it thoroughly. It might report differently when you ask from different angles but I have not seen contradiction.

Chinese DeepSeek just kicked CHATgpt's ass, so much so that Nvidia and the associated AI stocks crashed today.

I think its a "pump & dump", that DeepSeek is a formidable AI and not just another CHATgpt.

I want to see DeepSeek play AlphaZero (Google's AI) in chess. AlphaZero beat Stockfish the original chess champ soundly.

So until I see some real test of technical ability by DeepSeek it is just another search engine, not a true AI.

 

[JohnDB]

GIGO
Garbage In - Garbage Out

Chat GPT regurgitates what it's programmers feed it. Most of them seem to have been Left leaning and hence Chat GPT has a Left-leaning bias most of the time. Strongly!

What is wrong about Left-Wing and Woke is that it is not Right.

Woke does not care about lives since it advocates for economic implosion and focuses on greed of the non-productive, non-profitable.

Not exactly....
It searches the internet for information....sometimes proprietary information and regurgitated it.

Wokepedia is often a cited source but Reddit or other information platforms are not....
Then there are the online encyclopedias used....again controlled by liberal agenda organizations.

What is really needed is a "culling" of the sources it uses to find information for you.. and that's on you to do when asking it a question or to accomplish something.

You can limit where it looks or give it a limited database to search.

 

[catatomic]

Not exactly....
It searches the internet for information....sometimes proprietary information and regurgitated it.

Wokepedia is often a cited source but Reddit or other information platforms are not....
Then there are the online encyclopedias used....again controlled by liberal agenda organizations.

What is really needed is a "culling" of the sources it uses to find information for you.. and that's on you to do when asking it a question or to accomplish something.

You can limit where it looks or give it a limited database to search.

Do you use wokepedia and online encyclopedias for information?

ChatGPT said:​

I use a combination of sources to provide information. My training data includes a mix of publicly available information up until my cutoff in October 2023, as well as factual databases and vetted resources. For up-to-date or specific queries, I use the web tool, which can search the internet, including credible encyclopedias or similar platforms, depending on the query.
If you're asking specifically about "Wokepedia," that seems like a colloquial or satirical reference rather than an established source, but if it's a specific platform, let me know and I can adapt accordingly.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

GIGO
Garbage In - Garbage Out

Chat GPT regurgitates what it's programmers feed it. Most of them seem to have been Left leaning and hence Chat GPT has a Left-leaning bias most of the time. Strongly!

What is wrong about Left-Wing and Woke is that it is not Right.

Woke does not care about lives since it advocates for economic implosion and focuses on greed of the non-productive, non-profitable.

Read Stryder50's nonsense to see what is right with AI programs like Chat GPT or co-pilot

 

[JohnDB]

Do you use wokepedia and online encyclopedias for information?

ChatGPT said:​

I use a combination of sources to provide information. My training data includes a mix of publicly available information up until my cutoff in October 2023, as well as factual databases and vetted resources. For up-to-date or specific queries, I use the web tool, which can search the internet, including credible encyclopedias or similar platforms, depending on the query.
If you're asking specifically about "Wokepedia," that seems like a colloquial or satirical reference rather than an established source, but if it's a specific platform, let me know and I can adapt accordingly.

Yeah....
Wikipedia has gone woke. It keeps changing established history for more post modern ideals....locking out those contributors with expertise who tell the truth for their preferred truth.

Credible encyclopedias?
Even encyclopedia Brittanica has been doing similar as Wikipedia these days on politically charged topics.

It's not to the point that you need to use printed materials yet which never change....but almost.

I've been using electronic books for decades as it keeps me from getting a pile of books to climb over when refreshing my coffee. However.....if things do not improve soon (and I don't think they will) I may have to return to using my physical library instead of the online library I keep.

 

[catatomic]

Yeah....
Wikipedia has gone woke. It keeps changing established history for more post modern ideals....locking out those contributors with expertise who tell the truth for their preferred truth.

Credible encyclopedias?
Even encyclopedia Brittanica has been doing similar as Wikipedia these days on politically charged topics.

It's not to the point that you need to use printed materials yet which never change....but almost.

I've been using electronic books for decades as it keeps me from getting a pile of books to climb over when refreshing my coffee. However.....if things do not improve soon (and I don't think they will) I may have to return to using my physical library instead of the online library I keep.

I will not dispute that Wikipedia or even Brittanica are left and woke, but that's not what it said about what it uses.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The facts are what counts. If they use real facts, we can quarrel about intepretation.

 

[catatomic]

The facts are what counts. If they use real facts, we can quarrel about intepretation.

If they use real facts, then probably AI wins.

 

[JohnDB]

I will not dispute that Wikipedia or even Brittanica are left and woke, but that's not what it said about what it uses.

Yes, the devil is in the details....
Ask GPT the source material when it goes online.

 

[catatomic]

Yes, the devil is in the details....
Ask GPT the source material when it goes online.

I did in post #9. Here it is again, you're welcome to it:

Do you use wokepedia and online encyclopedias for information?

ChatGPT said:​

I use a combination of sources to provide information. My training data includes a mix of publicly available information up until my cutoff in October 2023, as well as factual databases and vetted resources. For up-to-date or specific queries, I use the web tool, which can search the internet, including credible encyclopedias or similar platforms, depending on the query.
If you're asking specifically about "Wokepedia," that seems like a colloquial or satirical reference rather than an established source, but if it's a specific platform, let me know and I can adapt accordingly.