ISIS is claiming credit

aris2chat

Gold Member
Feb 17, 2012
18,678
4,687
280
follow the dots to ISIS and now the organization in the middle east is claiming responsibility.
Opportunity or coincidence, they are connected to the mass shooting in SB.
 
follow the dots to ISIS and now the organization in the middle east is claiming responsibility.
Opportunity or coincidence, they are connected to the mass shooting in SB.

Evidence?

Yanno anyone can jump up after the fact and claim ownership.

I personally invented water.
 
follow the dots to ISIS and now the organization in the middle east is claiming responsibility.
Opportunity or coincidence, they are connected to the mass shooting in SB.

Evidence?

Yanno anyone can jump up after the fact and claim ownership.

I personally invented water.
The woman pledged loyality to ISIS on Facebook. That is all. Not a terrorist attack but a typical act of madness.
 
Because we know that ISIS would never lie to us, right? They're such honest upstanding people, after all.

Revisionistas use the same po-faced credulity on the whole "Hitler was a socialist" canard. His party was called "socialist" and golly gee they wouldn't lie. Nor would the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
 
follow the dots to ISIS and now the organization in the middle east is claiming responsibility.
Opportunity or coincidence, they are connected to the mass shooting in SB.

Evidence?

Yanno anyone can jump up after the fact and claim ownership.

I personally invented water.
The woman pledged loyality to ISIS on Facebook. That is all. Not a terrorist attack but a typical act of madness.

Agree, that's what it looks like. Terrorism after all requires some kind of coercion agenda.
 
follow the dots to ISIS and now the organization in the middle east is claiming responsibility.
Opportunity or coincidence, they are connected to the mass shooting in SB.
I'm going to claim responsibility for all the people that weren't shot that day, all over CA, and ending hunger, at Dodger's games.
 
Usually IS might throw out a tweet a day or so before an attack. They didn't this time. In fact, the first reported tweet that came form them was they did awesome. It took them another hour or so to say "our 3 lions" or whatever. She might have pledged herself to them, but I don't think they had anything to do with it..
She could have been a part of Lashkar-e-Omar, which is a Pakistan terrorist cell that has ties to AQ. AQ has ties to IS... JS people need to THINK and not erupt..
 
follow the dots to ISIS and now the organization in the middle east is claiming responsibility.
Opportunity or coincidence, they are connected to the mass shooting in SB.

Of course, why not, it makes them more powerful and scary, they are getting blamed for it anyway.
 
follow the dots to ISIS and now the organization in the middle east is claiming responsibility.
Opportunity or coincidence, they are connected to the mass shooting in SB.

Evidence?

Yanno anyone can jump up after the fact and claim ownership.

I personally invented water.

ISIS wants the attention and recruiting power from an act like this. If the wife or both had ties to ISIS then it given more news time and power to ISIS as a whole "look what we can do to the mighty USA"

Does not matter if it was a lone wolf, though that many pipe bombs and the extent they took to hide their activity would go to prove this was not a spur of the moment but had planning involved.

Ordered or not it seems ISIS was somehow the inspiration for their activity.
 
follow the dots to ISIS and now the organization in the middle east is claiming responsibility.
Opportunity or coincidence, they are connected to the mass shooting in SB.

Evidence?

Yanno anyone can jump up after the fact and claim ownership.

I personally invented water.

ISIS wants the attention and recruiting power from an act like this. If the wife or both had ties to ISIS then it given more news time and power to ISIS as a whole "look what we can do to the mighty USA"

Does not matter if it was a lone wolf, though that many pipe bombs and the extent they took to hide their activity would go to prove this was not a spur of the moment but had planning involved.

Ordered or not it seems ISIS was somehow the inspiration for their activity.

There's a distinct difference between "inspiring" and "being responsible for".
 
follow the dots to ISIS and now the organization in the middle east is claiming responsibility.
Opportunity or coincidence, they are connected to the mass shooting in SB.

Evidence?

Yanno anyone can jump up after the fact and claim ownership.

I personally invented water.

ISIS wants the attention and recruiting power from an act like this. If the wife or both had ties to ISIS then it given more news time and power to ISIS as a whole "look what we can do to the mighty USA"

Does not matter if it was a lone wolf, though that many pipe bombs and the extent they took to hide their activity would go to prove this was not a spur of the moment but had planning involved.

Ordered or not it seems ISIS was somehow the inspiration for their activity.

There's a distinct difference between "inspiring" and "being responsible for".


Islamic State claim responsibility for California shootings
 
follow the dots to ISIS and now the organization in the middle east is claiming responsibility.
Opportunity or coincidence, they are connected to the mass shooting in SB.

Evidence?

Yanno anyone can jump up after the fact and claim ownership.

I personally invented water.

ISIS wants the attention and recruiting power from an act like this. If the wife or both had ties to ISIS then it given more news time and power to ISIS as a whole "look what we can do to the mighty USA"

Does not matter if it was a lone wolf, though that many pipe bombs and the extent they took to hide their activity would go to prove this was not a spur of the moment but had planning involved.

Ordered or not it seems ISIS was somehow the inspiration for their activity.

There's a distinct difference between "inspiring" and "being responsible for".


You can play semantics but for ISIS, it is a brownie point in the plus column. They don't have to give a specific order but have people training to carry out attacks anywhere any time. Tracing a trail becomes harder because there does not have to be any direct contact or orders to investigate. ISIS can be responsible for attack by those it has no connection to, but it is still done on behalf of ISIS, the caliphate and allah, in their mind. That much harder to prevent attacks.

The wife seems to have trained in yemen before her marriage. A wife leading is a new turn but not the first time husband and wife were partners in terror.
 
Wonder if we're going to get through this holiday shopping season without a mall being hit ?

For years I have been surprised Islamists haven't hit one yet, I have a feeling it's coming, and soon.
 
What's the fucking difference if they were in contact with ISIS or not? They were rabid Muslims that just did what their book told them to do. These Muslims had money, an education, jobs, and even a kid, yet they went on a suicide rampage to take out as many infidels as they could. ANY Muslim can turn out this way, not just ones that are recruited by known terrorist groups.
 
The amount of denial in the face of the enemy just amazes me. Who cares whether it was isis or not? They were radicalized period. Who cares by who or how within the argument? That is for the authorities to figure out. They wanted to massacre as many of us as they could, for their radical belief in the caliphate of world dominion by sharia.

Surely you don't believe they just got their feelings hurt, now do you, after the weapons cache which included bombs, was found?
 
Last edited:
These two had to get the funding from somewhere, because the FBI said they didn't have means to buy all that on their own.
 
Totally. And my question is who were the others working in that garage at night the neighbors saw? Who acquired the rifles?
These two had to get the funding from somewhere, because the FBI said they didn't have means to buy all that on their own.
 
follow the dots to ISIS and now the organization in the middle east is claiming responsibility.
Opportunity or coincidence, they are connected to the mass shooting in SB.

Evidence?

Yanno anyone can jump up after the fact and claim ownership.

I personally invented water.

ISIS wants the attention and recruiting power from an act like this. If the wife or both had ties to ISIS then it given more news time and power to ISIS as a whole "look what we can do to the mighty USA"

Does not matter if it was a lone wolf, though that many pipe bombs and the extent they took to hide their activity would go to prove this was not a spur of the moment but had planning involved.

Ordered or not it seems ISIS was somehow the inspiration for their activity.

There's a distinct difference between "inspiring" and "being responsible for".


You can play semantics but for ISIS, it is a brownie point in the plus column. They don't have to give a specific order but have people training to carry out attacks anywhere any time. Tracing a trail becomes harder because there does not have to be any direct contact or orders to investigate. ISIS can be responsible for attack by those it has no connection to, but it is still done on behalf of ISIS, the caliphate and allah, in their mind. That much harder to prevent attacks.

The wife seems to have trained in yemen before her marriage. A wife leading is a new turn but not the first time husband and wife were partners in terror.

That's a tenuous connection with a lot of guesswork, and basically no different from Robert Dear wigging out on the Planned Parenthood blogosphere rhetoric. Same difference. You can't say one's responsible on the basis of influence, and yet the other one isn't.
 

Forum List

Back
Top