Kamala Harris Says She Has a Glock, but Many Glocks Are Barred in California by a Law She Supported

[tyroneweaver]

focused group filtered lies

Kamala Harris Says She Has a Glock, but CA Bars Some Glocks by a Law She Supported

Kamala Harris said she owns a Glock, but did not mention residents in her home state of California cannot own newer generation Glocks because of a law she supported.

www.breitbart.com

 

[Augustine_]

focused group filtered lies

Kamala Harris Says She Has a Glock, but CA Bars Some Glocks by a Law She Supported

Kamala Harris said she owns a Glock, but did not mention residents in her home state of California cannot own newer generation Glocks because of a law she supported.

www.breitbart.com

^

 

[Mashmont]

focused group filtered lies

Kamala Harris Says She Has a Glock, but CA Bars Some Glocks by a Law She Supported

Kamala Harris said she owns a Glock, but did not mention residents in her home state of California cannot own newer generation Glocks because of a law she supported.

www.breitbart.com

Harris doesn't know a glock from a clock.

 

[lg325]

What type?????????

GLOCK models and calibers​

Generated using AI

1. • 
     GLOCK 17
     Full-size workhorse
   • 
     GLOCK 19 and 19x
     Compact and concealable
   • 
     GLOCK 26
     Subcompact double-stack
2. • 
     GLOCK 43
     Single-stack subcompact
   • 
     GLOCK 34
     Long-slide competition
   • 
     GLOCK 45
     Newest model
3. • 
     GLOCK 22
     Full-size duty gun
   • 
     GLOCK 23
     Compact .40 S&W
   • 
     GLOCK 27
     Subcompact .40 S&W
4. • 
     GLOCK 35
     Long-slide .40 S&W
   • 
     GLOCK 21
     Full-size .45 ACP
   • 
     GLOCK 30
     Subcompact .45 ACP
5. • 
     GLOCK 36
     Single-stack .45 ACP
   • 
     GLOCK 41
     Long-slide .45 ACP
   • 
     GLOCK 42
     Single-stack .380
6. • 
     GLOCK 20
     Full-size 10mm
   • 
     GLOCK 29
     Subcompact 10mm
   • 
     GLOCK 40
     Lo

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

focused group filtered lies

Kamala Harris Says She Has a Glock, but CA Bars Some Glocks by a Law She Supported

Kamala Harris said she owns a Glock, but did not mention residents in her home state of California cannot own newer generation Glocks because of a law she supported.

www.breitbart.com

California doesn't apply. She lives at the Naval Observatory in DC. She cannot have a weapon on a military facility anyway,

 

[Polishprince]

California doesn't apply. She lives at the Naval Observatory in DC. She cannot have a weapon on a military facility anyway,

Does it make a difference? Kamala has armed guards protecting her 24/7.

 

[JGalt]

She's already admitted to owning a Glock. Both California and Washington DC require that all handgun be registered, and DC has a ban on magazines with a greater than 10 round capacity. Most Glock pistols commonly used have a 15-round magazine.

In addition, the state of California classifies Glock pistols as "unsafe handguns" because they do not have a compliant chamber load indicator and lack a magazine disconnect mechanism. It was Kamala Harris herself who supported California's Unsafe Handgun Act.

Kamala Harris says she owns a Glock despite supporting handgun bans in SF, prompting speculation it’s unregistered​

"California state law requires gun buyers to have a Firearm Safety Certificate and DC requires all handguns to be registered.

Glocks, furthermore, cannot legally have magazines with a capacity of more than 10 bullets in the nation’s capital, and some models of Glock come with a standard capacity that exceeds that limit.

“DC residents have to register their firearms. And DC issues a gun-registration ID card for each firearm, with the make, model, and serial number. Post your card, Kamala,” tweeted Mike Davis, a former clerk for Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and a former Senate Judiciary Committee aide.

Kamala Harris says she owns a Glock despite supporting handgun bans in SF, prompting speculation it’s unregistered

​

Harris questioned for owning gun classified as ‘unsafe’ weapon in California​

"Vice President Kamala Harris was happy to remind voters that she owns a gun, but the more they learn about her firearms, the more they ask why she appears to support a double standard for gun owners.

During her 60 Minutes interview Monday night, Harris followed up on previous statements that she is a gun owner with some specifics that she owns a Glock pistol. The Democratic presidential nominee said she has owned one for "quite some time" and has practiced firing it at a gun range...

..."Note that California law classifies ALL Glocks as 'unsafe handguns' because they do not have a compliant chamber load indicator, lack a magazine disconnect mechanism, and until our lawsuit caused California to repeal the requirement, of course lacked microstamping," Kostas Moros, an attorney with Michel & Associates representing the California Rifle & Pistol Association, posted on X.

"The only reason we can still buy Gen 3s is because they are grandfathered in, but they are still 'unsafe handguns,'" Moros continued. "We can't buy more modern Glocks new in gun stores (just secondhand from exempt cops, or from those who moved here with them from other states). She supported the Unsafe Handgun Act and expanded it such that microstamping began to be enforced in 2013. So why does she own an 'unsafe handgun'?"

Microstamping is a controversial technology that engraves markings into a gun's inner workings so that law enforcement authorities can match bullet cartridges to a specific gun and then find the firearm's owner. According to Moros, all Glocks lack microstamping.

Harris was attorney general of California in 2013 when the Justice Department authorized the state to institute a 2007 law requiring new models of handguns to be microstamped. In 2023, the California legislature passed a law banning the sale of any handgun that isn't "microstamping-enabled."

Another gun rights organization, the National Association for Gun Rights, similarly criticized her on the same points.

Harris questioned for owning gun classified as ‘unsafe’ weapon in California

 

[EMH]

The most left wing Senator ever....

is backed by Dick Cheney, owns a Glock, brags about how she would immediately cap off an intruder....


yet is for gun confiscation and defunding the police...


At some point, you realize this woman is really not sane....

 

[EMH]

Does it make a difference? Kamala has armed guards protecting her 24/7.

There is a pattern of hypocrisy amongst those pushing the hardest for gun confiscation.

Feinstein had a carry permit.

Kamala owns a Glock and brags about how quickly she would cap off an intruder.

Carl Rowan... wow... RIP Carl...

 

[Vrenn]

She's already admitted to owning a Glock. Both California and Washington DC require that all handgun be registered, and DC has a ban on magazines with a greater than 10 round capacity. Most Glock pistols commonly used have a 15-round magazine.

In addition, the state of California classifies Glock pistols as "unsafe handguns" because they do not have a compliant chamber load indicator and lack a magazine disconnect mechanism. It was Kamala Harris herself who supported California's Unsafe Handgun Act.

Kamala Harris says she owns a Glock despite supporting handgun bans in SF, prompting speculation it’s unregistered​

"California state law requires gun buyers to have a Firearm Safety Certificate and DC requires all handguns to be registered.

Glocks, furthermore, cannot legally have magazines with a capacity of more than 10 bullets in the nation’s capital, and some models of Glock come with a standard capacity that exceeds that limit.

“DC residents have to register their firearms. And DC issues a gun-registration ID card for each firearm, with the make, model, and serial number. Post your card, Kamala,” tweeted Mike Davis, a former clerk for Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and a former Senate Judiciary Committee aide.

Kamala Harris says she owns a Glock despite supporting handgun bans in SF, prompting speculation it’s unregistered

​

Harris questioned for owning gun classified as ‘unsafe’ weapon in California​

"Vice President Kamala Harris was happy to remind voters that she owns a gun, but the more they learn about her firearms, the more they ask why she appears to support a double standard for gun owners.

During her 60 Minutes interview Monday night, Harris followed up on previous statements that she is a gun owner with some specifics that she owns a Glock pistol. The Democratic presidential nominee said she has owned one for "quite some time" and has practiced firing it at a gun range...

..."Note that California law classifies ALL Glocks as 'unsafe handguns' because they do not have a compliant chamber load indicator, lack a magazine disconnect mechanism, and until our lawsuit caused California to repeal the requirement, of course lacked microstamping," Kostas Moros, an attorney with Michel & Associates representing the California Rifle & Pistol Association, posted on X.

No such law exists. Heller V DC states that you are authorized a handgun in your home. Glocks are not specifically mentioned. Gaslighting is your best habit.

"The only reason we can still buy Gen 3s is because they are grandfathered in, but they are still 'unsafe handguns,'" Moros continued. "We can't buy more modern Glocks new in gun stores (just secondhand from exempt cops, or from those who moved here with them from other states). She supported the Unsafe Handgun Act and expanded it such that microstamping began to be enforced in 2013. So why does she own an 'unsafe handgun'?"

You said it yourself. The higher capacity handguns have been grandfathered in.

Microstamping is a controversial technology that engraves markings into a gun's inner workings so that law enforcement authorities can match bullet cartridges to a specific gun and then find the firearm's owner. According to Moros, all Glocks lack microstamping.

Harris was attorney general of California in 2013 when the Justice Department authorized the state to institute a 2007 law requiring new models of handguns to be microstamped. In 2023, the California legislature passed a law banning the sale of any handgun that isn't "microstamping-enabled."

Another gun rights organization, the National Association for Gun Rights, similarly criticized her on the same points.

Harris questioned for owning gun classified as ‘unsafe’ weapon in California

The fact remains that the real law as in the Court Rulings is a mag capacity of 15 or less. Therefore, some Glocks meet that requirement and can be sold out of FFL Guns Shops but others cannot.

 

[excalibur]

She's lying.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

focused group filtered lies

Kamala Harris Says She Has a Glock, but CA Bars Some Glocks by a Law She Supported

Kamala Harris said she owns a Glock, but did not mention residents in her home state of California cannot own newer generation Glocks because of a law she supported.

www.breitbart.com

It's not the firearm that is restricted, it's the capacity of the magazine(s).

Last time I purchased a firearm in California they had not yet passed a law restricting magazine sizes to a maximum of ten rounds. And to the best of my knowledge, any firearms owned/purchased prior to the legislation going into effect were grandfathered in.

So you would be incorrect in stating that Vice President Harris is violating the law SIMPLY because she owns a Glock.

 

[skye]

Kamasutra Harris should be in jail or she is lying

Those two options!

 

[Missouri_Mike]

She's already admitted to owning a Glock. Both California and Washington DC require that all handgun be registered, and DC has a ban on magazines with a greater than 10 round capacity. Most Glock pistols commonly used have a 15-round magazine.

In addition, the state of California classifies Glock pistols as "unsafe handguns" because they do not have a compliant chamber load indicator and lack a magazine disconnect mechanism. It was Kamala Harris herself who supported California's Unsafe Handgun Act.

Kamala Harris says she owns a Glock despite supporting handgun bans in SF, prompting speculation it’s unregistered​

"California state law requires gun buyers to have a Firearm Safety Certificate and DC requires all handguns to be registered.

Glocks, furthermore, cannot legally have magazines with a capacity of more than 10 bullets in the nation’s capital, and some models of Glock come with a standard capacity that exceeds that limit.

“DC residents have to register their firearms. And DC issues a gun-registration ID card for each firearm, with the make, model, and serial number. Post your card, Kamala,” tweeted Mike Davis, a former clerk for Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and a former Senate Judiciary Committee aide.

Kamala Harris says she owns a Glock despite supporting handgun bans in SF, prompting speculation it’s unregistered

​

Harris questioned for owning gun classified as ‘unsafe’ weapon in California​

"Vice President Kamala Harris was happy to remind voters that she owns a gun, but the more they learn about her firearms, the more they ask why she appears to support a double standard for gun owners.

During her 60 Minutes interview Monday night, Harris followed up on previous statements that she is a gun owner with some specifics that she owns a Glock pistol. The Democratic presidential nominee said she has owned one for "quite some time" and has practiced firing it at a gun range...

..."Note that California law classifies ALL Glocks as 'unsafe handguns' because they do not have a compliant chamber load indicator, lack a magazine disconnect mechanism, and until our lawsuit caused California to repeal the requirement, of course lacked microstamping," Kostas Moros, an attorney with Michel & Associates representing the California Rifle & Pistol Association, posted on X.

"The only reason we can still buy Gen 3s is because they are grandfathered in, but they are still 'unsafe handguns,'" Moros continued. "We can't buy more modern Glocks new in gun stores (just secondhand from exempt cops, or from those who moved here with them from other states). She supported the Unsafe Handgun Act and expanded it such that microstamping began to be enforced in 2013. So why does she own an 'unsafe handgun'?"

Microstamping is a controversial technology that engraves markings into a gun's inner workings so that law enforcement authorities can match bullet cartridges to a specific gun and then find the firearm's owner. According to Moros, all Glocks lack microstamping.

Harris was attorney general of California in 2013 when the Justice Department authorized the state to institute a 2007 law requiring new models of handguns to be microstamped. In 2023, the California legislature passed a law banning the sale of any handgun that isn't "microstamping-enabled."

Another gun rights organization, the National Association for Gun Rights, similarly criticized her on the same points.

Harris questioned for owning gun classified as ‘unsafe’ weapon in California

Camela is the epitome of the politician that loves to make rules for everyone else and will send you to prison for breaking them but doesn’t think those laws should apply to her.

She’s a pot smoker who spent her days sending pot smokers to prison and ruining families.

She’s a gun owner that has the exact gun she wants you in jail for owning.

She’s worried about democracy yet is running for an office not a single person in the US voted for her to be the nominee of.

She says she’s a law enforcement person, while she raised bail money for criminals.

She says she’s for border control, while letting millions of illegals in.

She’s a fucking fraud.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

There is a pattern of hypocrisy amongst those pushing the hardest for gun confiscation.

Feinstein had a carry permit.

Kamala owns a Glock and brags about how quickly she would cap off an intruder.

Carl Rowan... wow... RIP Carl...

Vice President Harris is NOT in the same category as Feinstein.

Feinstein SUCCESSFULLY FOUGHT to prevent any other Californians from LAWFULLY carrying a firearm via permit while she herself had a permit to carry and even carried into a restricted area of a hospital to visit husband.

I would never say to another woman that they don't NEED a weapon, the hypocrisy stems from she stating as much to us.

VP Harris has never done that. She's not trying to keep people who are not prohibited from lawfully carrying.

 

[IM2]

focused group filtered lies

Kamala Harris Says She Has a Glock, but CA Bars Some Glocks by a Law She Supported

Kamala Harris said she owns a Glock, but did not mention residents in her home state of California cannot own newer generation Glocks because of a law she supported.

www.breitbart.com

Harris lives in DC right now.

 

[Woodznutz]

I doubt that she owns a gun.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

What a bunch of crybabies, geez lol.

 

[EMH]

Vice President Harris is NOT in the same category as Feinstein.

Feinstein SUCCESSFULLY FOUGHT to prevent any other Californians from LAWFULLY carrying a firearm via permit while she herself had a permit to carry and even carried into a restricted area of a hospital to visit husband.

I would never say to another woman that they don't NEED a weapon, the hypocrisy stems from she stating as much to us.

VP Harris has never done that. She's not trying to keep people who are not prohibited from lawfully carrying.

Complete bullshit, she is for gun confiscation, and has said so publicly. She is as National Socialist on "gun control" as it gets.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Complete bullshit, she is for gun confiscation, and has said so publicly. She is as National Socialist on "gun control" as it gets.

On what grounds is she going to confiscate lawfully held firearms and how exactly is she allegedly going to achieve this?

Our gun laws are enforced at the state level so are you claiming that she's going to personally push through a law to confiscate every known lawfully owned firearm in the country? Again, on what grounds?

There are plenty of groups who have and still are pushing an agenda to get gun "crime" categorized as a public health crisis. Is she doing that?

If not, what SPECIFICALLY is she doing that leads reasonable people to believe that she is planning a LAWFUL gun confiscation law and then event.

I don't agree with Red Flag laws because in my opinion, they by-pass the due process guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and tack it on after the fact in the form of a "hearing" but after the citizen has already been deprived of his "...life, freedom or property" in violation of the same

A Due Process Clause is found in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which prohibit the deprivation of "life, liberty, or property" by the federal and state governments, respectively, without due process of law.​