BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 43,796
- 26,966
You miss those days, huh.Both Obama and Harris would have been forced to the back of the bus during Jim Crow.
Claiming to be only half black would not have saved them
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You miss those days, huh.Both Obama and Harris would have been forced to the back of the bus during Jim Crow.
Claiming to be only half black would not have saved them
You're the one making the accusations, you tell us.
Why the fuck would we impeach Biden? He hasn't done anything impeachable. In fact, the economy is booming because of his policies! He should be applauded!Look, I get it. Kamala is the most stupid, incompetent person ever to serve as VP, selected because she’s 1) black, and 2) female.
Let’s say we go head and dump the now-demented man who is indebted to Ukraine, Russia, and China - and puts their interests ahead of ours.
1) We get rid of a corrupted president who is making decisions in favor of America’s enemies. The importance of this cannot be overstated.
2) We get the Affirmative Action VP moved into the presidency. The incompetence of Democrats will be so apparent, and their focus on “diversity” instead of ability so obvious, that everyone but the extreme left will vote against a continuation of Liberalism.
Finally, the timing is critical since we cannot really afford to have an idiot as president (but then again, look what we have now), so if we begin the impeachment inquiry this fall, move onto the impeachment trial itself in the winter, and have Biden convicted by summer, we will only have to suffer with a Harris presidency for a few months - and it will pretty much ensure a Republican win.
Kamala could achieve title of worst president in US history: Gingrich
Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich discusses the "inconceivable" possibility of a Kamala Harris presidency on Tuesday on "Jesse Watters Primetime."www.foxnews.com
Likewise.Lets just face it, Republicans will be upset regardless of who the Democratic President is
Chris Christy, Asa HutchinsonManchin.
Which Republican would you vote for?
I could also tolerate Nikki Haley or Tim ScottChris Christy, Asa Hutchinson
Neither is out to protect the Constitution and the Rule of Law.I could also tolerate Nikki Haley or Tim Scott
Not full Crazy Train
What are they looking away from to impeach Biden?There's plenty of evidence to impeach him. Of course the Senate won't convict but he needs to be impeached. The problem is the Rs are cowards and look away.
She would be answering to Obama too,so what difference does it make?Yeah, she was chose to make Uncle RICO both 25th and impeachment proof but he has gotten so bad I don't think it would much matter at this point.
I agree. Lefties live for labels they impose on others. Impeachment needs to be attached to that jackass.Even if the Senate wouldn't impeach Biden, he needs to have that stain on his record.
And they are required to suck his pedo ass at all times.It's sad how far the Dem party has fallen since its peak during the Obama cult love years. Now they are stuck with Biden. lol
Why? You don’t.Neither is out to protect the Constitution and the Rule of Law.
I want republicans who know and care for the Constitution and Rule of Law.
You folks opened that door, which ended in Trump's exonerations. Perhaps Biden too will not be convicted. Although you may want to consider that there are a few Senators that would greatly benefit from Biden's removal. All the ones that would like a shot in 2024, which Biden is currently closed off, or possibly the Senators that have left the party or contemplating doing so, or those that were rejected for Cabinet positions because they couldn't afford special elections anywhere in the country.zero evidence...zero logic. That is what you have.
Biden is going to be your president until 2024 and likely 2028 if you guys nominate the blob.You folks opened that door, which ended in Trump's exonerations. Perhaps Biden too will not be convicted. Although you may want to consider that there are a few Senators that would greatly benefit from Biden's removal. All the ones that would like a shot in 2024, which Biden is currently closed off, or possibly the Senators that have left the party or contemplating doing so, or those that were rejected for Cabinet positions because they couldn't afford special elections anywhere in the country.
Doubtful, he's on borrowed time, each day is another disaster and there are only so many disastrous utterances that the press can or will put up with.Biden is going to be your president until 2024 and likely 2028 if you guys nominate the blob.
Harris wouldn't make any different decisions than Biden, except for she is even more progressive.Look, I get it. Kamala is the most stupid, incompetent person ever to serve as VP, selected because she’s 1) black, and 2) female.
Let’s say we go head and dump the now-demented man who is indebted to Ukraine, Russia, and China - and puts their interests ahead of ours.
1) We get rid of a corrupted president who is making decisions in favor of America’s enemies. The importance of this cannot be overstated.
2) We get the Affirmative Action VP moved into the presidency. The incompetence of Democrats will be so apparent, and their focus on “diversity” instead of ability so obvious, that everyone but the extreme left will vote against a continuation of Liberalism.
Finally, the timing is critical since we cannot really afford to have an idiot as president (but then again, look what we have now), so if we begin the impeachment inquiry this fall, move onto the impeachment trial itself in the winter, and have Biden convicted by summer, we will only have to suffer with a Harris presidency for a few months - and it will pretty much ensure a Republican win.
Kamala could achieve title of worst president in US history: Gingrich
Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich discusses the "inconceivable" possibility of a Kamala Harris presidency on Tuesday on "Jesse Watters Primetime."www.foxnews.com
But she wouldn’t let China take surveillance photos of our military bases since China doesn’t have the goods on her for blackmail.Harris wouldn't make any different decisions than Biden, except for she is even more progressive.
Unless they get evidence that links Joe to bribery, which im pretty sure they will. If that evidence is found then democrats would be forced to impeach, or show themselves as a group who protects people being bribed. Not impeaching would do a great amount of damage to the democrat party. Its a win win for us.He can't be removed anyway. No point in impeachment proceedings.
Also..the more damage he does, the less votes Democrats get.
Don't you think Kamala has that very same intent?But she wouldn’t let China take surveillance photos of our military bases since China doesn’t have the goods on her for blackmail.
We simply cannot have a president who is as compromised as Biden. Look at how quickly our nation has deteriorated in just two years. That’s by intent.