Mark Cuban says Kamala will never tax unrealized gains, even though she said she would

Votto

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2012
60,026
63,125
3,605

This is the height of insanity. Kamala Harris has indicated in the past that she would, in fact, tax unrealized gains at some point if able to do so.

However, Mark Cuban, a self-made billionaire who has given Kamala his undying support, tells the world that she would never do that because that would cause ruination of the economy and the country.

Wut?

So, essentially Mark Cuban is supporting this candidate and is betting his entire economic future on the premise that Kamala is a liar?

Simply amazing.

The article ended by saying,

NBC News contacted the Harris-Walz campaign for clarification on the vice president’s stance on taxing unrealized gains. The campaign declined to comment.

:omg:
 

This is the height of insanity. Kamala Harris has indicated in the past that she would, in fact, tax unrealized gains at some point if able to do so.

However, Mark Cuban, a self-made billionaire who has given Kamala his undying support, tells the world that she would never do that because that would cause ruination of the economy and the country.

Wut?

So, essentially Mark Cuban is supporting this candidate and is betting his entire economic future on the premise that Kamala is a liar?

Simply amazing.

The article ended by saying,

NBC News contacted the Harris-Walz campaign for clarification on the vice president’s stance on taxing unrealized gains. The campaign declined to comment.

:omg:

He and the world understand that Harris will literally say anything.
 

This is the height of insanity. Kamala Harris has indicated in the past that she would, in fact, tax unrealized gains at some point if able to do so.

However, Mark Cuban, a self-made billionaire who has given Kamala his undying support, tells the world that she would never do that because that would cause ruination of the economy and the country.

Wut?

So, essentially Mark Cuban is supporting this candidate and is betting his entire economic future on the premise that Kamala is a liar?

Simply amazing.

The article ended by saying,

NBC News contacted the Harris-Walz campaign for clarification on the vice president’s stance on taxing unrealized gains. The campaign declined to comment.

:omg:
Makes me wonder how Cuban got his $$$. He has never struck me as the sharpest knife in the drawer. Now he thinks he knows how word salad thinks. LMAO SMFH.
 
Cuban seems to be admitting that he thinks harris is a liar, but doesn’t care and will vote for her
 
Wait. Are we at the point where a supporter like Cuban recognizes that Kamalalala has no intention of ever honoring her word?

Cool.
 

This is the height of insanity. Kamala Harris has indicated in the past that she would, in fact, tax unrealized gains at some point if able to do so.

However, Mark Cuban, a self-made billionaire who has given Kamala his undying support, tells the world that she would never do that because that would cause ruination of the economy and the country.

Wut?

So, essentially Mark Cuban is supporting this candidate and is betting his entire economic future on the premise that Kamala is a liar?

Simply amazing.

The article ended by saying,

NBC News contacted the Harris-Walz campaign for clarification on the vice president’s stance on taxing unrealized gains. The campaign declined to comment.

:omg:

I believe Cuban. Notably, a President cannot levy taxes on her own accord. There's no way taxing unrealized gains will ever get passed by Congress.
 
I believe Cuban. Notably, a President cannot levy taxes on her own accord. There's no way taxing unrealized gains will ever get passed by Congress.
Cuban some years ago did say that when walking down a street and seeing African Americans walking up the street towards you that he crosses the street to the other side. That all white people do it. And he owned the Dallas Mavericks.
 
Well that inspires confidence. Vote for Kamala because she WON'T do what she says.

Kamala Harris' Freedom Flip-Flop

Harris is running away from her far-left past.

Kamala Harris' most consistent political trait may be a lack of consistency. Over the course of her long career, first in California and then in Washington, D.C., the Democrats' 2024 presidential nominee has been plagued by plausible allegations that she's hard to pin down and lacks a stable ideological core. She's a flip-flopper—or, if you want to be charitable, she evolves quickly.
On Freedom???
Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, have even embraced "freedom" as a central theme of their 2024 campaign. The word is emblazoned all over their rally sites. Lyrics about freedom pulsed over and over again between speeches at the Democratic National Convention (DNC). But what do Democrats mean by "freedom"? At best, it's an inconsistent vision. At worst, it's an attempt at radically redefining what American freedom means.
On Private Health Insurance??
Harris' positions on some matters, especially health care policy, moved around a lot. Asked on the Democrats' presidential debate stage in June 2019 who would eliminate private insurance, Harris raised her hand. On MSNBC's Morning Joe the next day, she said she would not do that. The plan she eventually introduced was something of an everything-to-everyone scheme, allowing private insurance to coexist alongside a Medicare-for-anyone-who-wants-it option of questionable feasibility.
On Gun confiscation??
With each new flip-flop, Harris has been embracing more moderate and mainstream positions—and in most cases, this has led her in a less authoritarian direction. In 2019, Harris called it "a good idea" to force owners of semiautomatic rifles to sell them to the government. In August, a Harris spokesperson said she would not push a mandatory buyback program as president.
On banning Fracking??
While running for president last time, Harris said there was "no question" that she was in "in favor of banning fracking," an oil and gas extraction method that has helped lower natural gas prices and reduced reliance on coal but troubled environmentalists over concerns about potential ill effects. In July, Harris' campaign told The Hill that a President Harris would not seek a ban on fracking.
Yup might as well add taxing unrealized capital gains to the mix.
 
I believe Cuban. Notably, a President cannot levy taxes on her own accord. There's no way taxing unrealized gains will ever get passed by Congress.
You are correct in most cases. But it can be done. Biden raised everyone's taxes unilaterally by his policies that increased fuel prices. In so doing he started the unbridled inflation that we've all suffered. In addition to the hidden tax of having to pay 20-30% more for everything, everyone's tax burden increased with higher sales taxes and for those low income people who got increases in their wages, they have to pay income taxes they didn't pay before and they are not receiving the welfare payments that they might have been receiving with the lower wages. Those low wage earners actually less spending power as a result of all of these changes.
 

This is the height of insanity. Kamala Harris has indicated in the past that she would, in fact, tax unrealized gains at some point if able to do so.

However, Mark Cuban, a self-made billionaire who has given Kamala his undying support, tells the world that she would never do that because that would cause ruination of the economy and the country.

Wut?

So, essentially Mark Cuban is supporting this candidate and is betting his entire economic future on the premise that Kamala is a liar?

Simply amazing.

The article ended by saying,

NBC News contacted the Harris-Walz campaign for clarification on the vice president’s stance on taxing unrealized gains. The campaign declined to comment.

:omg:
Yeah riiiiiiight.... And the income tax was supposed to end when the war did.
 
You are correct in most cases. But it can be done. Biden raised everyone's taxes unilaterally by his policies that increased fuel prices. In so doing he started the unbridled inflation that we've all suffered. In addition to the hidden tax of having to pay 20-30% more for everything, everyone's tax burden increased with higher sales taxes and for those low income people who got increases in their wages, they have to pay income taxes they didn't pay before and they are not receiving the welfare payments that they might have been receiving with the lower wages. Those low wage earners actually less spending power as a result of all of these changes.
Correct
 

Forum List

Back
Top