Might want to stay away from the Texas State Fair, as an appeals court says that event can ban guns. Gun Free Zone anyone?

What a stupid argument.

Why do you applaud and love arming nut jobs that shoot their classmates?
/----/ I don't. Anyone using a firearm in the commission of a crime should get a mandatory 7 years added to their sentence. It's liberal judges and DAs who let them off easy.
And stop with the stupid hyperbole.
 
/----/ I don't. Anyone using a firearm in the commission of a crime should get a mandatory 7 years added to their sentence. It's liberal judges and DAs who let them off easy.
And stop with the stupid hyperbole.
You support the 2nd, it makes you a supporter of arming nut jobs. Many countries in the civilised world take a different approach, they only arm the suitable.
 
/—-/ So, you are against enforcing gun laws already on the books, and letting criminals off easy. Just as long as law abiding citizens have their gun rights restricted.
OK.
Your "gun laws" are merely a token gesture. Law abiding citizens are not affected by gun laws because guns are aimed at law abiding citizens. What you're struggling with is, the person needs to have the correct gun mentality.

So I've giving you a clue ^^^ to this tricky question -

Yanks say good guys and bad guys, so how do you determine what a good guy is?

Many mass shooters or killers can have no previous record and you hold "good guy" and "bad guy" in your head.
 
Your "gun laws" are merely a token gesture. Law abiding citizens are not affected by gun laws because guns are aimed at law abiding citizens. What you're struggling with is, the person needs to have the correct gun mentality.

So I've giving you a clue ^^^ to this tricky question -

Yanks say good guys and bad guys, so how do you determine what a good guy is?

Many mass shooters or killers can have no previous record and you hold "good guy" and "bad guy" in your head.
/—-/ Regardless of your irrational fear of gun rights, you are mentally unfit to own a firearm.
 
You didn't answer my simple question, try again.
/——/ “Yanks say good guys and bad guys, so how do you determine what a good guy is?“
The American soldiers who showed up to stop the Nazis from conquering Britian were the good guys. The Nazis were the bad ones.
Hope that answers your question.
 
/——/ “Yanks say good guys and bad guys, so how do you determine what a good guy is?“
The American soldiers who showed up to stop the Nazis from conquering Britian were the good guys. The Nazis were the bad ones.
Hope that answers your question.
No it doesn't answer the question, it's just a prick reply. If the planet took your prick reply as serious, you believe everyone in the USA is a bad guy. What a fuckwit you are. You haven't got one fucking clue as to what a good guy, bad guy, and gun orientation are. No wonder you're dumber than a box of rocks with the gun debate. In fact, you haven't a clue what the debate is a out.

In Cellblock's empty head, "Der, everyone is a good guy, der, he did a mass murder, der, he was a bad guy".
 
No it doesn't answer the question, it's just a prick reply. If the planet took your prick reply as serious, you believe everyone in the USA is a bad guy. What a fuckwit you are. You haven't got one fucking clue as to what a good guy, bad guy, and gun orientation are. No wonder you're dumber than a box of rocks with the gun debate. In fact, you haven't a clue what the debate is a out.

In Cellblock's empty head, "Der, everyone is a good guy, der, he did a mass murder, der, he was a bad guy".
/—-/ Then stop pestering me. You reject everything I post.
 
/—-/ Then stop pestering me. You reject everything I post.
Because you're dumber than a box of rocks. Just stop being dumb and look at guns from a UK, New Zealand, Australia, Europe point of view and it'll suddenly click on your head.

When I first learned double entry, accountancy, it was all confusing etc... Then one day, something just clicks in your head and it all makes sense. I suggest you try that with guns.

Apply for a firearm in the UK because you joined a gun range. Once you pass the application process, the firearm officer will not recommend you buying one or two guns, but several. I kid you not. So why don't we have your dreadful problem?

ALL
public places here are gun free spaces, your tampon falls out over ONE gun free space in the US, blaming it for gun violence.

Edit: I bet a million quid that the vast majority, if not all, American gun owners would fail a UK firearms application, purely based on gun mentality/orientation.
 
Because you're dumber than a box of rocks. Just stop being dumb and look at guns from a UK, New Zealand, Australia, Europe point of view and it'll suddenly click on your head.

When I first learned double entry, accountancy, it was all confusing etc... Then one day, something just clicks in your head and it all makes sense. I suggest you try that with guns.

Apply for a firearm in the UK because you joined a gun range. Once you pass the application process, the firearm officer will not recommend you buying one or two guns, but several. I kid you not. So why don't we have your dreadful problem?

ALL
public places here are gun free spaces, your tampon falls out over ONE gun free space in the US, blaming it for gun violence.

Edit: I bet a million quid that the vast majority, if not all, American gun owners would fail a UK firearms application, purely based on gun mentality/orientation.
/——-/ “The Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms in English common law and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689. Sir William Blackstonedescribed this right as an auxiliary right, supporting the natural rights of self-defense and resistance to oppression, and the civic duty to act in concert in defense of the state.[12]While both James Monroe and John Adams supported the Constitution being ratified, its most influential framer was James Madison. In Federalist No. 46, Madison wrote how a federal army could be kept in check by the militia, "a standing army ... would be opposed [by] militia." He argued that State governments "would be able to repel the danger" of a federal army, "It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops." He contrasted the federal government of the United States to the European kingdoms, which he described as "afraid to trust the people with arms", and assured that "the existence of subordinate governments ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition" -Wikipedia
 
You support the 2nd, it makes you a supporter of arming nut jobs. Many countries in the civilised world take a different approach, they only arm the suitable.
No those governments only arm those THE GOVERNMENT finds suitable. That means only those who support the government. OUR government doesn't take that approach, in fact our constitution forbids it. Our founders were clear, the people shouldn't fear the government, instead the government should fear the people. Your government's power comes from the government, ours comes from the assent of the people.
 
No those governments only arm those THE GOVERNMENT finds suitable. That means only those who support the government. OUR government doesn't take that approach, in fact our constitution forbids it. Our founders were clear, the people shouldn't fear the government, instead the government should fear the people. Your government's power comes from the government, ours comes from the assent of the people.
/—-/ He’s just another busybody Brit trying to govern our lives.
 
/——-/ “The Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms in English common law and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689. Sir William Blackstonedescribed this right as an auxiliary right, supporting the natural rights of self-defense and resistance to oppression, and the civic duty to act in concert in defense of the state.[12]While both James Monroe and John Adams supported the Constitution being ratified, its most influential framer was James Madison. In Federalist No. 46, Madison wrote how a federal army could be kept in check by the militia, "a standing army ... would be opposed [by] militia." He argued that State governments "would be able to repel the danger" of a federal army, "It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops." He contrasted the federal government of the United States to the European kingdoms, which he described as "afraid to trust the people with arms", and assured that "the existence of subordinate governments ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition" -Wikipedia
You can go over the 2nd a billion times, the whole planet knows your fucking 2nd Amendment, get it out of your system, we know. It's killing you guys, the majority of the world have advanced on from those days. It's you mongs stuck in the past, you need to give yourselves a shake and get living in the present.
 
No those governments only arm those THE GOVERNMENT finds suitable. That means only those who support the government. OUR government doesn't take that approach, in fact our constitution forbids it. Our founders were clear, the people shouldn't fear the government, instead the government should fear the people. Your government's power comes from the government, ours comes from the assent of the people.
Full of shit, but you are a retarded Yank.

I started a thread in the Europe section a little while back on UK guns, hopefully for such thick Jeremy Hunts like you to drag your brain up from Neanderthal level. But thick shit you still are.
 

Forum List

Back
Top