Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How do the wounds sustained by Brown match up with the account that Wilson was attacked in the police vehicle?
Brown sustained at least 2 head wounds. They would have to have been fired at point blank range if he was allegedly leaning into the vehicle and beating Wilson hard enough to break his eye socket, right? But the autopsy stated that there was no gun powder residue on the body.
How do the wounds sustained by Brown match up with the account that Wilson was attacked in the police vehicle?
Brown sustained at least 2 head wounds. They would have to have been fired at point blank range if he was allegedly leaning into the vehicle and beating Wilson hard enough to break his eye socket, right? But the autopsy stated that there was no gun powder residue on the body.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/u...-shows-he-was-shot-at-least-6-times.html?_r=0
Yet another story from the authorities that doesn't add up.
I have worked with cops in a volunteer capacity for many years now and one of things that they have told me is that you know that someone is lying if their story keeps changing. Normally that is what they hear from the perps.
In this instance the changing story is coming from the Ferguson PD.
Normally I am the last person to question a cop about a shooting because I have been through their simulation training and making the right call in a split second is not always going to happen. But in this instance something is not right here.
I am waiting for all of the facts to come to light before making a decision. Let the FBI make this call because it doesn't add up from where I am standing.
Until the chickenshit Ferguson Police Department comes clean with PUBLIC INFORMATION, then they are just fueling speculation and incurring the wrath of their predominant demographic, black people.
All these idiots defending Wilson just don't seem to care that the FPD is releasing NO FACTS, nothing.
Rumors seem to suit bigots.
The mere fact that it's 11 days and FPD is still hiding from the PEOPLE WHO PAY THEIR SALARIES tells me a lot about this killing.
I want to see the bloodstain pattern analysts's report. But I bet the Ferguson PD either doesn't even know what that is or will bury it.
How do the wounds sustained by Brown match up with the account that Wilson was attacked in the police vehicle?
Brown sustained at least 2 head wounds. They would have to have been fired at point blank range if he was allegedly leaning into the vehicle and beating Wilson hard enough to break his eye socket, right? But the autopsy stated that there was no gun powder residue on the body.
No one ever said saint michael of brown was shot while he was leaning in the vehicle. You haven't been paying attention, obviously.
...and there was no residue on the body because he was WEARING CLOTHES...christ..even Dr. Baden said that..you are clueless..but you DO have an agenda, I see.
Brown sustained at least 2 head wounds. They would have to have been fired at point blank range if he was allegedly leaning into the vehicle and beating Wilson hard enough to break his eye socket, right? But the autopsy stated that there was no gun powder residue on the body.
"they"? only one person shot saint michael of brown. You really ARE clueless.Why would they shoot Brown 6 times if he wasn't close enough to be hitting anyone?
Brown wasn't wearing any clothing on his eyes or do you have some secret information about what he was wearing that nobody else has.
Not at all. My agenda is accuracy.And ironic that you are accusing others of having an agenda.
How do the wounds sustained by Brown match up with the account that Wilson was attacked in the police vehicle?
Brown sustained at least 2 head wounds. They would have to have been fired at point blank range if he was allegedly leaning into the vehicle and beating Wilson hard enough to break his eye socket, right? But the autopsy stated that there was no gun powder residue on the body.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/u...-shows-he-was-shot-at-least-6-times.html?_r=0
Yet another story from the authorities that doesn't add up.
I have worked with cops in a volunteer capacity for many years now and one of things that they have told me is that you know that someone is lying if their story keeps changing. Normally that is what they hear from the perps.
In this instance the changing story is coming from the Ferguson PD.
Normally I am the last person to question a cop about a shooting because I have been through their simulation training and making the right call in a split second is not always going to happen. But in this instance something is not right here.
I am waiting for all of the facts to come to light before making a decision. Let the FBI make this call because it doesn't add up from where I am standing.
I think you're missing a key factor here, after the 'situation' in the car, EVERYONE says Brown and Johnson ran, so no, it does not mean Wilson fired point blank from the car at all.
If this thug attacked this officer and he did break his eyesocket. How the fuck can you say he didn't have the justification to shoot?
How do the wounds sustained by Brown match up with the account that Wilson was attacked in the police vehicle?
Brown sustained at least 2 head wounds. They would have to have been fired at point blank range if he was allegedly leaning into the vehicle and beating Wilson hard enough to break his eye socket, right? But the autopsy stated that there was no gun powder residue on the body.
No one ever said saint michael of brown was shot while he was leaning in the vehicle. You haven't been paying attention, obviously.
...and there was no residue on the body because he was WEARING CLOTHES...christ..even Dr. Baden said that..you are clueless..but you DO have an agenda, I see.
Why would they shoot Brown 6 times if he wasn't close enough to be hitting anyone?
Brown wasn't wearing any clothing on his eyes or do you have some secret information about what he was wearing that nobody else has.
And ironic that you are accusing others of having an agenda.
If this thug attacked this officer and he did break his eyesocket. How the fuck can you say he didn't have the justification to shoot?
If that is true then Wilson did have justification to shoot but that story has been "leaked". It hasn't come from an official source. Which begs the question, why not?
How do the wounds sustained by Brown match up with the account that Wilson was attacked in the police vehicle?
Brown sustained at least 2 head wounds. They would have to have been fired at point blank range if he was allegedly leaning into the vehicle and beating Wilson hard enough to break his eye socket, right? But the autopsy stated that there was no gun powder residue on the body.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/u...-shows-he-was-shot-at-least-6-times.html?_r=0
Yet another story from the authorities that doesn't add up.
I have worked with cops in a volunteer capacity for many years now and one of things that they have told me is that you know that someone is lying if their story keeps changing. Normally that is what they hear from the perps.
In this instance the changing story is coming from the Ferguson PD.
Normally I am the last person to question a cop about a shooting because I have been through their simulation training and making the right call in a split second is not always going to happen. But in this instance something is not right here.
I am waiting for all of the facts to come to light before making a decision. Let the FBI make this call because it doesn't add up from where I am standing.
I think you're missing a key factor here, after the 'situation' in the car, EVERYONE says Brown and Johnson ran, so no, it does not mean Wilson fired point blank from the car at all.
If Brown was running away then he must have been running backwards because all of the shots entered his body from the front except for the one on top of his head and the one to the eye that exited the jaw and hit his shoulder.
Again, the story doesn't gel with the known facts.
Brown sustained at least 2 head wounds. They would have to have been fired at point blank range if he was allegedly leaning into the vehicle and beating Wilson hard enough to break his eye socket, right? But the autopsy stated that there was no gun powder residue on the body.
No one ever said saint michael of brown was shot while he was leaning in the vehicle. You haven't been paying attention, obviously.
...and there was no residue on the body because he was WEARING CLOTHES...christ..even Dr. Baden said that..you are clueless..but you DO have an agenda, I see.
"they"? only one person shot saint michael of brown. You really ARE clueless.Why would they shoot Brown 6 times if he wasn't close enough to be hitting anyone?
Brown wasn't wearing any clothing on his eyes or do you have some secret information about what he was wearing that nobody else has.
GSR only travels about 3 or 4 feet.
saint michael of brown was farther away than that when he got shot in the head...Don't you know ANY of the details?
Not at all. My agenda is accuracy.And ironic that you are accusing others of having an agenda.
Adrenaline.
Maybe. But googling around, I'm not the only one asking about why no medical attention or concern over injuries on the officer. No ambulance called, no first aid rendered, something stinks.
Im not on anyone's side but the right side. If someone lies I'm all over their ass. And up to now, I'd not felt the officer or police had lied. But I gotta say, this sounds deceptive. Googling orbital blowout fractures, selecting Images, they're really obvious even without any blood. The officer might be oblivious from adrenaline, but no one looking at him would be. Yet no concern on the video, no one calling an ambulance for him? That's suspicious.
