Zone1 New Horror Movie Coming to Churches?

[Donald H]

I'm in your head.

Yes, you are in my head and no others except Woodnutz is stepping up to take your place.

But he and I have already concluded that the resurrection was not true in a physical sense.

Now we can apply that revelation to all the lies and bullshit in the bibles that you and I have concluded aren't literally true.

Why didn't I see that months ago? That takes care of our issue with Jonah and the big fish. It's in the heads of Christians as being symbolic.

I would recommend that conclusion to other atheists too!

 

[ding]

Yes, you are in my head and no others except Woodnutz is stepping up to take your place. But he and I have already concluded that the resurrection was not true in a physical sense. Now we can apply that revelation to all the lies and bullshit in the bibles that you and I have concluded aren't literally true. Why didn't I see that months ago? That takes care of our issue with Jonah and the big fish. It's in the heads of Christians as being symbolic. I would recommend that conclusion to other atheists too!

Your proclamations of what others have said ring hollow.

You see the accounts in the bible the way you do because you don't understand what it is or its context. The reader is obliged to read the text as written, which includes literal and symbolic aspects that are properties belonging to the author’s descriptive portrayal of reality. Since you don't place these texts in context and don't understand the point of the accounts you have no chance of reading these texts as the author intended. Your explanation for each account is skewed by your belief that these accounts are idiotic, so you provide an explanation that is idiotic. My explanation for each account is based on reading the text as written, which includes literal and symbolic aspects that are properties belonging to the author’s descriptive portrayal of reality. So my explanation won't sound idiotic. My explanation will make a lot of sense. Which you will promptly dismiss because you are so certain you can't be wrong about anything.

 

[Donald H]

Your proclamations of what others have said ring hollow.

You see the accounts in the bible the way you do because you don't understand what it is or its context. The reader is obliged to read the text as written, which includes literal and symbolic aspects that are properties belonging to the author’s descriptive portrayal of reality. Since you don't place these texts in context and don't understand the point of the accounts you have no chance of reading these texts as the author intended. Your explanation for each account is skewed by your belief that these accounts are idiotic, so you provide an explanation that is idiotic. My explanation for each account is based on reading the text as written, which includes literal and symbolic aspects that are properties belonging to the author’s descriptive portrayal of reality. So my explanation won't sound idiotic. My explanation will make a lot of sense. Which you will promptly dismiss because you are so certain you can't be wrong about anything.

I've just finished telling you my friend, that I read the fore mentioned bible stories as some both literally true and some symbolically true.

Ask me for my choice on each specific bible story. Rational minds such as ours will surely agree. It's no mystery to me!

For example: Jonah and the big fish? It has to be symbolic!

I know the symbolic explanation. Do you?

I think we've reached a milestone on agreement with each other, unless we disagree on any of the stories?

 

[ding]

I've just finished telling you my friend, that I read the fore mentioned bible stories as some both literally true and some symbolically true.

Ask me for my choice on each specific bible story. Rational minds such as ours will surely agree. It's no mystery to me!

For example: Jonah and the big fish? It has to be symbolic!

I know the symbolic explanation. Do you?

I think we've reached a milestone on agreement with each other, unless we disagree on any of the stories?

I gave you every opportunity to do so in the bull ring. You ran away like a pussy.

 

[Donald H]

I gave you every opportunity to do so in the bull ring. You ran away like a pussy.

You may find that White6 moved the thread and then somebody closed it, which was contrary to the established rules for the section to which it was moved.
You could ask to have it opened. For what purpose, I don't know? All I'm asking for is a bible story that I can judge to be symbolic or literally true. Literally true or bullsh-t. We'll decide together!

If you're looking for disagreement, I would suggest you just claim that Jonah and the big fish story is literally true. I might disagree, but maybe not.

 

[ding]

You may find that White6 moved the thread and then somebody closed it, which was contrary to the established rules for the section to which it was moved.
You could ask to have it opened. For what purpose, I don't know? All I'm asking for is a bible story that I can judge to be symbolic or literally true. Literally true or bullsh-t. We'll decide together!

If you're looking for disagreement, I would suggest you just claim that Jonah and the big fish story is literally true. I might disagree, but maybe not.

And you may find that it's still there.