Nope. He's a white supremacist, I disagree with him, I'M MAGA, and you a lib, agree with him, as does the OP.
So, that's pretty clear and makes sense.
Nick, the white suprematist is sayihgn shit that libs like and agree with. You cite him, and give him attention, that he needs, and you work together to attack Jason Whitlock and known conservative.
ON the other side, AGAINST the WHITE SUPREMACIST AND YOU LIBS, is TRUMP AND MAGA.
So, yeah. That's the issue.
Would you like to suport NICK'S claim that Whitlock is a "Token"?
I know that mostly you libs just ASSERT shit and that's really all the "reasoning" you have, so, that was not a serious question on my part, but there it is, if you want to try.
You know, I take that back. THe important part is that you agree with it. I don't. You look at conservative blacks and see "tokens", and MAGA sees fellow conservatives, or MAGA.
That's the take away here. YOu and the w.s. see tokens, and maga sees US.