NY "Prosecutors" want to use immunized evidence against President Trump - the Lawfare continues

[Contumacious]

WE THE PEOPLE , MAGA PATRIOTS , object to using immunized evidence against President Trump. The US Supreme Court previously ruled that
"Presidential immunity protects against the evidentiary use of official acts against a President in criminal proceedings, because Presidential immunity prohibits a court or jury from “examin[ing] acts for which a President is immune” “even on charges that purport to be based only on his unofficial conduct.” Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 630-631 (2024). The Corrupt state prosecutors want President Trump to waive this defense, For shame. NOT GONNA HAPPEN - WOULDN'T BE PRUDENT .

 

[IM2]

Wrong answer MAGANUT. Trump broke the law and he's getting a far better chance than you would get if you had done the same thing.

 

[DonGlock26]

Wrong answer MAGANUT. Trump broke the law and he's getting a far better chance than you would get if you had done the same thing.

Nonsense.


"NY bills specifically targeted at Donald Trump

State Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal has been prolific in this field.


State Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal has made a habit of introducing bills aimed at former President Donald Trump, and Tuesday’s indictment has given him inspiration for his latest one: a proposal to allow cameras in New York courts in an effort to draw even more eyeballs to his indictment and trial. Although attempts to repeal the law banning cameras date further back than the Trump indictment, the situation brought renewed attention to the matter and provided a high profile case to make the case to the public for its necessity.

Hoylman-Sigal asserted that New Yorkers are “repulsed” by the former president’s actions, including inciting the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol and not disclosing his tax records.

“I take a special responsibility as a New Yorker – the original home state of Donald Trump – to ensure that the public gets the truth about his background,” Hoylman-Sigal said. “It’s our responsibility to bring those issues to bear.”"

NY bills specifically targeted at Donald Trump

State Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal has been prolific in this field.

www.cityandstateny.com

 

[Contumacious]

Wrong answer MAGANUT. Trump broke the law and he's getting a far better chance than you would get if you had done the same thing.

The Socialist Demon Rats used LAWFARE as a means to interfere with my right to vote for the candidate of my choice as well as my right to election integrity.

They failed.

Now I expect the Honorable K$H Patel and Ms Bondi to prosecute to the max. I want to hear the sound of their bones crushing.

 

[Lastamender]

 

[DonGlock26]

New York railroaded Trump.

 

[jwoodie]

USE YOUR IGNORE BUTTONS

 

[Contumacious]

USE YOUR IGNORE BUTTONS

because "jwoodie" believes ignorance is bliss

 

[Independent thinker]

Wrong answer MAGANUT. Trump broke the law and he's getting a far better chance than you would get if you had done the same thing.

But not as good of a chance as the leftists who have abused their power for political purposes and skated - so far. But soon the chickens will come home to roost.

 

[elektra]

Another part of the democrats insurrection

 

[IM2]

But not as good of a chance as the leftists who have abused their power for political purposes and skated - so far. But soon the chickens will come home to roost.

There are no such chickens.

 

[Contumacious]

There are no such chickens.

Watch how easily the Honorable K$H Patel and Pam Bondi will find the chickens.

 

[Contumacious]

WE THE PEOPLE , MAGA PATRIOTS , object to using immunized evidence against President Trump. The US Supreme Court previously ruled that
"Presidential immunity protects against the evidentiary use of official acts against a President in criminal proceedings, because Presidential immunity prohibits a court or jury from “examin[ing] acts for which a President is immune” “even on charges that purport to be based only on his unofficial conduct.” Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 630-631 (2024). The Corrupt state prosecutors want President Trump to waive this defense, For shame. NOT GONNA HAPPEN - WOULDN'T BE PRUDENT .

The Socialist Demon Rats wanted to embarras President Trump by forcing him to attend a "sentencing" Proceeding . They wanted to tell WE THE PEOPLE - MAGA Republicans - that their vote was irrelevant. They want to destroy the Office of the President for purely political reasons !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[WorldWatcher]

WE THE PEOPLE , MAGA PATRIOTS , object to using immunized evidence against President Trump. The US Supreme Court previously ruled that
"Presidential immunity protects against the evidentiary use of official acts against a President in criminal proceedings, because Presidential immunity prohibits a court or jury from “examin[ing] acts for which a President is immune” “even on charges that purport to be based only on his unofficial conduct.” Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 630-631 (2024). The Corrupt state prosecutors want President Trump to waive this defense, For shame. NOT GONNA HAPPEN - WOULDN'T BE PRUDENT .

Talking to someone about paying off a porn star through your fixer lawyer and money laundering your payments through your private business entiry is not an "official" act of the Office of the President defined in the Constitution or as part of the legal duties of the President of the United States.

All such acts or conversations were not part of the job.

WW

 

[Contumacious]

Talking to someone about paying off a porn star through your fixer lawyer

ANd that is a true statement because ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

 

[WorldWatcher]

ANd that is a true statement because ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Two people indicted, evidence presented, and convictions established in both Federal Court for Election Fraud (Cohen) and State Court for Business Fraud (Trump).

WW

 

[Contumacious]

Two people indicted, evidence presented, and convictions established in both Federal Court for Election Fraud (Cohen) and State Court for Business Fraud (Trump).

WW

Bullshit

DNC Official Merchan would not allow an expert of federal election Law testify but allowed biased scumbag Cohen to do so. Kangaroo Court Proceedings

 

[WorldWatcher]

Bullshit

DNC Official Merchan would not allow an expert of federal election Law testify but allowed biased scumbag Cohen to do so. Kangaroo Court Proceedings

This is false, Judge Merchan approved the FEC official to testify within his area of expertise.

He limited his testimony about New York Business law becaues he wasn't a New York Business law expert nor could he attempt to retry Cohen federal conviction.

Again Judge Merchan approved him as an expert witness, but his testimony was limited (as all expert witnesses are) to the case before the court and within the area of expertise.

The defense decided not to call the FEC person, the Judge didn't bar his ability to testify.

WW

 

[Contumacious]

This is false, Judge Merchan approved the FEC official to testify within his area of expertise.

He limited his testimony about New York Business law becaues he wasn't a New York Business law expert nor could he attempt to retry Cohen federal conviction.

Again Judge Merchan approved him as an expert witness, but his testimony was limited (as all expert witnesses are) to the case before the court and within the area of expertise.

The defense decided not to call the FEC person, the Judge didn't bar his ability to testify.

WW

Unconditional Discharge Proves ‘THERE WAS NO CASE’​

Trump: Unconditional Discharge Proves ‘THERE IS NO CASE’

Following his sentencing hearing where he received an unconditional discharge, President-elect Donald Trump took to Truth Social to share his thoughts on Judge Juan Merchan’s ruling.

www.oann.com