The Judiciary Is Attempting To Seize Executive Power

[mamooth]

How come you never demanded that the Cackle Queen invoke the 25th Amendment ?

Not all Trump cultists have such severe issues with women, but most do. They're just not right in the head.

 

[WEATHER53]

This is the judge who oversaw FISA abuse.



"The federal judge who is blocking Trump’s efforts to deport Venezuelan gang members also played a key and controversial role in the Trump-Russia collusion saga as the leader of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

Judge James Boasberg, nominated to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by then-President Barack Obama in 2011, is currently engaged in an all-out legal battle with the Trump Justice Department.

But in his role as the head of the FISA Court he made a number of divisive decisions, including a slap on the wrist for a member of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane team, the appointment of officials who had defended the FBI’s actions during the Russiagate saga, the renewal of the FBI’s FISA powers, and more."

Judge Blocking Trump Deportations Played Key Role in Trump-Russia FISA Saga - Tennessee Star

The federal judge who is blocking Trump’s efforts to deport Venezuelan gang members also played a key and controversial role in the Trump-Russia collusion saga as the leader of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

tennesseestar.com

Where were the constitutional safeguards then?

He’s corrupt

 

[elektra]

The judiciary? Actually it is unelected lawyers of the lower courts. And they are not attempting, they have complete control of the Donald Trump

 

[DonGlock26]

You're not as dumb as you're pretending to be there, so I'll ignore that phony question which was not offered in good faith.

Tell us, Trump cultists, what high crimes or misdemeanors did the judges commit to justify impeachment? Before you answer, remember that, to non-fascists, "disagreeing with DearLeader" is not a crime.

You can run now, cult boi. Your type always does when challegend to back up their cult talking points.

There's no chance of impeachment working, so we know what this is really about. You thugs are trying to justify violence against judges.

What, you thought it wasn't obvious? Come on.

"Section 1

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office."

The 3rd Article of the U.S. Constitution

SECTION. 1. The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at...

constitutioncenter.org

Usurping the powers of the chief executive is not good behavior.

 

[mamooth]

Usurping the powers of the chief executive is not good behavior.

Yet every Trump cultist adored it when it was done "against" Biden.

Since you're all such disgusting hypocrites on the issue, everyone knows you don't believe the BS you're spouting. You're all lying because the cult told you to lie.

 

[DonGlock26]

Yet every Trump cultist adored it when it was done "against" Biden.

Since you're all such disgusting hypocrites on the issue, everyone knows you don't believe the BS you're spouting. You're all lying because the cult told you to lie.

When was it done to Biden?

 

[mamooth]

When was it done to Biden?

Two quick examples, student loans and COVID mandates. There are many more.

And liberals did not scream that it was unconstitutional, and that the judges must be impeached.

 

[DonGlock26]

Two quick examples, student loans and COVID mandates. There are many more.

And liberals did not scream that it was unconstitutional, and that the judges must be impeached.

So what did the courts rule about specifically?

 

[mamooth]

So what did the courts rule about specifically?

I'm not playing the SeaLioning game.

 

[DonGlock26]

I'm not playing the SeaLioning game.

So, you've got nothing but rage and name calling. Got it.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Usurping the powers of the chief executive is not good behavior.

When the chief executive fails to faithfully execute the laws of the United States as required by the Constitution...

Ya it is the job of the Judiciary.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

When was it done to Biden?

Texas / Missouri - Cases involveing Student Loan Debt.

Texas - Case involving the Biden Administration and the Abortion Pill.

Louisiana - Case invovleing COVID mandates.

WW

 

[DonGlock26]

When the chief executive fails to faithfully execute the laws of the United States as required by the Constitution...

Ya it is the job of the Judiciary.

WW

Usurping is not constitutional.

 

[DonGlock26]

Texas / Missouri - Cases involveing Student Loan Debt.

Texas - Case involving the Biden Administration and the Abortion Pill.

Louisiana - Case invovleing COVID mandates.

WW

So what did the courts rule about specifically?

 

[WorldWatcher]

So what did the courts rule about specifically?

Google is your friend.

I'm not you secretary.

(Now you can come back and say "you got noth'n", but ya, the cases of GOP judge shopping and geting national injunctions are there for anyone to look at.)

WW

 

[DonGlock26]

Google is your friend.

I'm not you secretary.

(Now you can come back and say "you got noth'n", but ya, the cases of GOP judge shopping and geting national injunctions are there for anyone to look at.)

WW

I guess you can't produce examples of judicial overreach against Biden either.

 

[WorldWatcher]

I guess you can't produce examples of judicial overreach against Biden either.

I gave you three examples. You are free to look them up.

(BTW - Ya I could produce them. Just not going to waste my time. If you actually do the research to might learn something.)

WW

 

[DonGlock26]

I gave you three examples. You are free to look them up.

(BTW - Ya I could produce them. Just not going to waste my time. If you actually do the research to might learn something.)

WW

Yeah, but you didn't say how your examples were judicial overreach or misbehavior, so they are worthless.

 

[Nostra]

Green card = in the country in accordance with the law. The "pleasure of the government" has nothing to do with it. But thanks for proving you'll say anything Trump tells you

Once again you expose your ignorance of how the USA operates, stupid. Go fix your shithole country.

"There are many grounds of deportability, including criminal convictions, prostitution, domestic violence," Stephen Yale-Loehr, a retired immigration professor at Cornell University, told Newsweek. "One of the more obscure grounds that has existed for many years allows the secretary of State to put someone into deportation proceedings if the Secretary determines that that person's presence has serious adverse foreign policy consequences."

"That provision has not been used very often," Yale-Loehr continued. "I can only recall one time, or two times, in the last 30 years, but now we have seen at least two instances where this administration has invoked that ground of deportability, both to revoke those students' visas and to place them in deportation proceedings."

Could visa and green card holders be deported? What the law says

As the Trump administration gets tougher on immigration, those with legal status are becoming increasingly anxious.

www.newsweek.com

 

[Nostra]

MAGA is now history, dude.

Weird. MAGA is more popular than ever with the American people, and your Dimtard Cult is at record lows.