The exec branch is at war with the judiciary.

[Rumpole]

Y

Yeah, to the letter. I've actually read the Constitution.

Clearly you haven't.

You’ve read the Constitution? Adorable. Pity you didn’t grasp it.

You treat it like scripture when it suits you and toilet paper when it doesn’t. Quoting it isn’t the same as understanding it--any parrot can mimic Jefferson.

Your argument isn't constitutional--it's mimicry, it's mediocrity.

And the Founders would’ve left your comprehension on the cutting room floor.

 

[Coyote]

No joke. It’s even worse than criminalizing people based on their political ideology, which Lisa558 also supports.

She's a real piece of work. If she weren't Jewish she would have been in the front of the mob demanding we send the refugees on the St. Louis back. These are bad times.

 

[Coyote]

Bullshit. We are making America safer and democrats are now resisting the will of the American people who voted for this. The democrat party is the enemy within and they're going to lose even more ground. Watch.

Said every dictator ever.

 

[Marener]

Bullshit. We are making America safer and democrats are now resisting the will of the American people who voted for this. The democrat party is the enemy within and they're going to lose even more ground. Watch.

Fascists often prey on the fears of the populace when they’re ending constitutional rights.

 

[Coyote]

Trump was entitled to and getting due process.

You support making undesirables disappear into foreign gulags because you’ve been told to be afraid. You’re a threat to the nation.

It's really happening. No due process.

 

[westwall]

You’ve read the Constitution? Adorable. Pity you didn’t grasp it.

You treat it like scripture when it suits you and toilet paper when it doesn’t. Quoting it isn’t the same as understanding it--any parrot can mimic Jefferson.

Your argument isn't constitutional--it's mimicry, it's mediocrity.

And the Founders would’ve left your comprehension on the cutting room floor.

Yeah, I have. It's a pity you haven't. You simply post ever more infantile screeching.

 

[BS Filter]

Said every dictator ever.

You still haven't learned the lesson from November 5th. Your propaganda isn't working. Carry on.

 

[BS Filter]

Fascists often prey on the fears of the populace when they’re ending constitutional rights.

Another idiot who hasn't learned the lesson of November 5th. Your propaganda isn't working. Carry on.

 

[Coyote]

You still haven't learned the lesson from November 5th. Your propaganda isn't working. Carry on.

Are saying we should have taken a page from your playbook and attacked the Capitol?

 

[Marener]

Another idiot who hasn't learned the lesson of November 5th. Your propaganda isn't working. Carry on.

The truth doesn’t give a shit who you voted for. SCOTUS just said that Trump is violating the constitution. It was unanimous.

 

[BS Filter]

Are saying we should have taken a page from your playbook and attacked the Capitol?

I'm saying democrats need to stop attacking the choice of the American people or expect to lose more ground. You obviously don't realize how bankrupt your political party is.

 

[BS Filter]

The truth doesn’t give a shit who you voted for. SCOTUS just said that Trump is violating the constitution. It was unanimous.

Now enforce it. Good luck.

 

[Rumpole]

Yeah, I have. It's a pity you haven't. You simply post ever more infantile screeching.

You know squat, I mean, it's clearly evident. What is a pity is your replies, for they, as counter arguments, are utterly incompetent. With an anemic mind of mush like yours, I'd recommend investing in toilet paper futures. If this is the best you can do, you can't be taken seriously.

Would someone find me a worthy opponent? Westwall is such a boor, as in the zenith of mediocrity.

 

[Rumpole]

Another idiot who hasn't learned the lesson of November 5th. Your propaganda isn't working. Carry on.

The 'lesson' we learned is that it was a pathetic victory margin of 1.5% where Trump had two years to campaign and Kamala only 3 months. Tsk tsk. Not to mention it's the right's second popular vote victory, where the real weight of public support is measured, in over 30 years. The lesson you should learn is that your so-called 'filter' is out of alignment.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The 'lesson' we learned is that it was a pathetic victory margin of 1.5% where Trump had two years to campaign and Kamala only 3 months. Tsk tsk. Not to mention it's the right's second popular vote victory, where the real weight of public support is measured, in over 30 years. The lesson you should learn is that your so-called 'filter' is out of alignment.

Poor Kamala.
She never did nuffin'.

 

[Rumpole]

Poor Kamala.
She never did nuffin'.

You always know you are talking to a moron when he uses 'patriot' in his avatar.

"Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel."-- said Samuel Johnson on April 7, 1775, as recorded by his biographer, James Boswell, in The Life of Samuel Johnson.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Considering you’re now on record against due process in addition to your history of opposing the first amendment, I wonder how many more constitutional rights you’ll decide to take away from people you don’t like?

Not the question I asked. All 9 justices agreed with me, but I’m the one that’s disgusting? You don’t support basic constitutional rights.

/——-/ democRAT lawfare:

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You always know you are talking to a moron when he uses 'patriot' in his avatar.

"Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel."-- said Samuel Johnson on April 7, 1775, as recorded by his biographer, James Boswell, in The Life of Samuel Johnson.

Poor Kamala, the best candidate the leftards could offer.

 

[Marener]

democRAT lawfare:

Trump’s lawlessness. If you’re going to do lots of illegal things, it’s not surprising that there’s lots of courts putting holds on it.

 

[j-mac]

Yes, federal district judges do have jurisdiction over cases involving violations of federal law and the Constitution--that’s black-letter law under 28 U.S. Code § 1331, which grants district courts jurisdiction over “all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.”

I suspect you are basing your opinion over a recent ruling by SCOTUS on Boasberg. Well, the Supreme Court's recent ruling in the Boasberg case was not about limiting that general jurisdiction. It was a procedural ruling, holding that challenges to removal under the Alien Enemies Act must be filed in the jurisdiction where the noncitizen is detained--not in the District of Columbia. That’s a venue-specific limitation, not a global denial of judicial authority.

So, to clarify my earlier statement:

A federal judge has jurisdiction over violations of federal law and the Constitution--provided the case is properly before the court in terms of venue, standing, and procedural posture.

The Supreme Court did not disagree with that general principle. It merely enforced where such challenges must be filed--not whether they can be filed at all.

So, the left's judge shopping is over.....Good.