250 Years Ago Alexander Hamilton Told Us How to Handle These Anti-Trump Judges

The 4th amendment to the Bill of Rights requires a hearing for anything that harms anyone.
Clearly Kilmar did not have his rights protects and was illegally deported without a hearing.
~~~~~~
Wrong, his illegal alien status was already established and was confirmed by his loss of appeal twice as an MS-13 gang banger.
 
trump is a Rouge, so called, president.
You got these guys convinced --

1745170118413.webp


:auiqs.jpg:
 
Wrong, they are the enforcement arm of the judicial branch.
No, they're not. They are part of the Executive Branch. The Judicial Branch has no enforsement arm. At all. In any way, shape or form.

The Bailiffs, US Marshalls, etc are in a Court House because the Executive Branch assigned them there. End of story.
 
Wrong, they are the enforcement arm of the judicial branch.
~~~~~~
The Marshals Service serves as the enforcement and security arm of the U.S. federal judiciary, and it is an agency of the U.S. Department of Justice and operates under the direction of the U.S. Attorney General
 
~~~~~~
Wrong, his illegal alien status was already established and was confirmed by his loss of appeal twice as an MS-13 gang banger.
But the trump regime HAS NEVER presented evidence in court of his MS-13 ties. But they post a lot of a socisl media BS. Just like their massive voter fraud lies in 2021. They lie A LOT.

PS: Bought any $1.95 gas lately?
 
The judiciary is the one who says what is supposed to be done with people, so that their rights are not violated.
The most the executive can do is arrest someone in order to ensure they go before a judge.
The executive cannot enforce a judgement to deport on their own.
That is totally illegal.
FALSE! Enforcement of laws is the job of the executive branch. And district judges have authority only to address things in their district, not the whole country and the world.
 
The 4th amendment to the Bill of Rights requires a hearing for anything that harms anyone.
Clearly Kilmar did not have his rights protects and was illegally deported without a hearing.
FALSE! The deportation was legal under the Alien Enemies Act.
 

250 Years Ago Alexander Hamilton Told Us How to Handle These Anti-Trump Judges

31 Mar 2025 ~~ By C. Douglas Golden

Why, precisely, is a judge in Washington allowed to decide what illegal immigrants with alleged gang affiliations, who were being detained in Texas, are entitled to before they’re deported from the country they’ve unlawfully entered?
That’s what Alexander Hamilton might like to know.
Yes, Hamilton might be the one founding father that it’s OK for Gen Z liberals to like because they can spit verses from “My Shot” on command — likely because the hip social studies teacher in high school let them listen to the “Hamilton” soundtrack for extra credit.
But before he was a rapping puppet for Lin-Manuel Miranda’s take on revolutionary American history, he was actually writing stuff that didn’t involve hip-hop jams with the Marquis de Lafayette. In particular, he was one of the three authors of “The Federalist Papers,” a series of 85 essays that argued in favor of the U.S. Constitution at the time of its ratification.
Dr. McCullough Weighs In: The History & Future of GLP-1s
“Given the exigent circumstances that [the court] has been made aware of this morning, it has determined that an immediate Order is warranted to maintain the status quo until a hearing can be set,” Boasberg, an Obama appointee, said in an order March 15, according to Fox News.
Boasberg continued to block any sort of removal under the Alien Enemies Act by challenging the government to prove why each individual being deported is, in fact, an “alien enemy.”
~Snip~
In fact, it’s unclear what Boasberg is doing adjudicating this case at all, given that the aliens in question were apparently detained in Raymondsville, Texas — a cool 1,700 miles from the District of Columbia — aside from naked venue-shopping from the American Civil Liberties Union, who (because of course) is representing the Venezuelan migrants. (“You can do all that, you’ve just got to do it in the right court. And the right court was in Texas,” said Judge Justin Walker, another member of the D.C. district court appeals panel, when summarizing the government’s argument against the case.)
~Snip~
In Federalist No. 78, one of the most influential documents pertaining to the role of the judiciary in the then-proposed Constitution, Hamilton wrote that the courts “have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment” and cannot effectuate those judgments on its own.
“Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them,” Hamilton wrote.​
“The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community,” he continued.
“The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever.
“It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.”
This view, Hamilton said, “suggests several important consequences.
“It proves incontestably, that the judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; that it can never attack with success either of the other two; and that all possible care is requisite to enable it to defend itself against their attacks,” he wrote.
“It equally proves, that though individual oppression may now and then proceed from the courts of justice, the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter; I mean so long as the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the legislature and the Executive.”


Commentary:
Judge Boasberg whether biased or paid has made his decision. Now let him try to enforce it.
There is nothing "Democratic" about the "Democrat Party" it. It is the party of Neo-Marxist Socialists and Tyranny.
The issue that activist judges are bringing to a boil is explained in this article.
"“The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community,” he continued.
“The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever."
“It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.”"
The Republic can only work when the three branches are composed of honest honorable people, and they All abide by the Constitution and not by outside influences. Something that Neo-Marxist Socialists find abhorrent and against their totalitarian ideology.
MAGA is fascist!
 
Why, precisely, is a judge in Washington allowed to decide what illegal immigrants with alleged gang affiliations, who were being detained in Texas, are entitled to before they’re deported from the country they’ve unlawfully entered?
The real question is why, faced with the above question, is Boasberg's decisions allowed to carry any weight at all--- especially against the sitting Elected Executive Office of the country, until the first question is answered first as to how and whether he has any say at all in a matter 1700 miles away! Until that question is answered, his decisions should carry absolutely no weight in the matter at all.

It is not a matter of holding up the entire country unless he is proven wrong, but a matter of letting the nation proceed until he proves himself right. I mean, who has priority here and benefit of the doubt? Some obscure judge somewhere or the Elected President of the country and the 78 million who elected him?

Judge Boasberg whether biased or paid has made his decision. Now let him try to enforce it.
It may come down to giving these scoundrels the finger. Democrats are just trying again to undo an election and usurp the will of the people with their unelected, installed, forth state of government:
  1. The Executive Office
  2. The Congress
  3. The Judiciary
  4. The Democrat Deep State
 
There is no evidence this guy was in a gang and if he was, it must be proven in court. Not only that, but it must be proven that his gang affiliation resulted in a crime.

I realize you racists just want to see non-whites being shipped out of America, but we do have laws.
Nothing need be proven about any illegal being in a gang. Simply the violation of US Code 8, Section 1325, is enough to qualify all illegals for deportation. Yeah we have laws all right.
 
There is no evidence this guy was in a gang and if he was, it must be proven in court. Not only that, but it must be proven that his gang affiliation resulted in a crime.

I realize you racists just want to see non-whites being shipped out of America, but we do have laws.


Low IQ-2.0 as usual trying to turn a discussion into a Racist matter

What sort of black person is prepared to harm his fellows so badly and so consistently ?

Are you really black as you claim , or are you a Fake as others have asserted ?
You post as though you are a mad old white man determined to upset black people .
 
There is no proof of criminality.
Wrong.... He was arrested with no drivers is license transporting illegal aliens in an automobile affiliated with MS-13.
This happened in Tennessee.
 
Back
Top Bottom