Boasberg’s Judicial Coup Update: Judge Gives President Trump Deadline of Tuesday for Compliance

Meanwhile Trump is ignoring him, so what’s the point?


You have never answered what law Biasberg said Trump broke. Unless you said “he doesn’t know yet.”
I did not, but it has been answered. Trump will lose the struggle with the judiciary he does not follow court directions. He can appeal. That's how he wins it.
 
The sooner we get the 600,000 convicted criminals Biden let in deported, the safer Americans will be.

If anyone gets killed when the killer is a "convicted criminal" illegal that Biden let in, and Boasberg protected them from deportation, they (Mayorkas & Boasberg) should both be prosecuted for negligence.
 
Last edited:
"Boasberg’s Judicial Coup Update: Judge Gives President Trump Deadline of Tuesday for Compliance



Judge James Boasberg issues a three-page order [SEE HERE] demanding the Trump administration deliver cabinet level details about their criminal alien deportation operation.


View attachment 1091884



Boasberg claims the information provided to him so far is “woefully inadequate,” and lacks the citations of what cabinet-level officials were involved in deporting criminal illegal aliens and Tren de Aragua gang members protected by a leftist immigration organization employing Judge Boasberg’s daughter.

Judge Boasberg appears to be focused on generating a contempt order against the Trump administration. Presumably, this would give Boasberg’s allied Democrats in congress a foothold for their needed 2018 election effort and another impeachment attempt.


“To begin, the Government cannot proffer a regional ICE official to attest to Cabinet-level discussions of the state-secrets privilege; indeed, his declaration on that point, not surprisingly, is based solely on his unsubstantiated ‘understand[ing],'” he said."





This makes sense. The Democrats in black robes want a cause for impeachment, so they are trying to block Trump at every turn.
Meanwhile the Roberts court looks on.
Impeach? LOL!

Not a chance simpleton. We're going to defund his entire administration next year.

Then you're going to see what blocked looks like.
 
Impeach? LOL!

Not a chance simpleton. We're going to defund his entire administration next year.

Then you're going to see what blocked looks like.
Defund? Like DOGE?
 
:mad-61:



1743201320870.webp
 
This is what? The third deadline this obscure judge has issue the president of the United States?

Question for any Dems on here about this part:

Boasberg claims the information provided to him so far is “woefully inadequate,” and lacks the citations of what cabinet-level officials were involved in deporting criminal illegal aliens

Did Biden or Obama ever do that about the millions of illegals that they deported?
What gives this Circuit court judge the notion he has a right to demand something like that from the president? :oops: :cuckoo:
In b4 he's bitchsmacked to Mars.
 
The sooner we get the 600,000 convicted criminals Biden let in deported, the safer Americans will be.

If anyone gets killed when the killer is a "convicted criminal" illegal that Biden let in, and Boasberg protected them from deportation, they (Mayorkas & Boasberg) should both be prosecuted for negligence.
They could get the death penalty.
 
It's not a ""loophole". It's a LAW (and created by the founding fathers themselves)

What law allows the President to overide the Constitution.

Can you please provide the United States Code Title and Section number please?

WW
 
What law allows the President to overide the Constitution.

Can you please provide the United States Code Title and Section number please?

WW

Alien Enemies Act. (US Code 50, Chapter 3, Sections 21-24.

How is the president overriding the Constitution ?Article & section please.
 
Last edited:

It's not a ""loophole". It's a LAW (and created by the founding fathers themselves)

Alien Enemies Act. (US Code 50, Chapter 3, Sections 21-24.

How is the president overriding the Constitution ?Article & section please.

You are changing the subject. The post you responded to was about a 3rd term for Trump not the AES.

You said there was a law.

I asked you for the law that allowed Trump to be elected to a 3rd Term.

WW
 
You are changing the subject. The post you responded to was about a 3rd term for Trump not the AES.

You said there was a law.

I asked you for the law that allowed Trump to be elected to a 3rd Term.

WW
I said nothing about any 3rd term for Trump, nor do I see that mentioned anywhere in the thread,. The topic (and title) of the thread is "Boesbers's Judicial Coup". That is what I'm talking about.
 
I said nothing about any 3rd term for Trump. The topic (and title) of the thread is "Boesbers's Judicial Coup". That is what I'm talking about.

The post * * YOU * * responded to was about a 3rd Term for Trump.

WW
 
Back
Top Bottom