Occupation 101

[Indeependent]

Wow! That chick is FUGLY! She's pissed because no one wants to have sex with her, even with the lights off.
Every nation has people who rant against it; even the US.

 

[Phoenall]

Saudi sheikhs? LOL Saudi Sheiks were nomads that didn't have a pot to piss in at the time you idiot. ARAMCO was entirely U.S. owned and they first struck oil in Saudi Arabia in 1938, in Dhaharan. ARAMCO didn't start sharing profits with the Saudis until 1950, moron.

The land was owned by Palestinians, you dimwit. As shown in the table.

Palestine was a Class A Mandate as confirmed by the signers of the Mandate and reconfirmed by the Lord Curzon memorandum. And as stated by the International Court of Justice.

So shut the hell up you moron.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928 Website: www.icj-cij.org

Summary 2004/2 9 July 2004 Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Request for advisory opinion) Summary of the Advisory Opinion of 9 July 2004​

"In order to indicate the legal consequences of the construction of the wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Court has first to determine whether or not the construction of that wall breaches international law. To this end, it first makes a brief historical analysis of the status of the territory concerned since the time that Palestine, having been part of the Ottoman Empire, was, at the end of the First World War, the subject of a class “A” mandate entrusted by the League of Nations to Great Britain. In the course of this analysis, the Court mentions the hostilities of 1948-1949, and the armistice demarcation line between Israeli and Arab forces fixed by a general armistice agreement of 3 April 1949 between Israel and Jordan, referred to as the “Green Line”. At the close of its analysis, the Court notes that the territories situated between the Green Line and the former eastern boundary of Palestine under the Mandate were occupied by Israel in 1967 during the armed conflict between Israel and Jordan. Under customary international law, the Court observes, these were therefore occupied territories in which Israel had the status of occupying Power. Subsequent events in these territories have done nothing to alter this situation. The Court concludes that all these territories (including East Jerusalem) remain occupied territories and that Israel has continued to have the status of occupying Power. "

http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/131/1677.pdf

So where are the arab shieks with all the money that owned the Ottoman land that the bought from the Ottoman land owners who lived outside of Palestine. The Palestinians were poor farm workers who followed the work from place to place. They could not afford their taxes and to eat most years so how could they afford to buy the land. It was the Ottomans that owned the land and they did not live in palestine

 

[Billo_Really]

Every nation has people who rant against it; even the US.

And its how you treat those people, which is a true measure of a country's greatness.

 

[Phoenall]

Every nation has people who rant against it; even the US.

And its how you treat those people, which is a true measure of a country's greatness.

And the world saw how American treats those people when they beat them with sticks, shot them, ran them down. So how great is America now ?