Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You wish to discount the science showing the earth being considerably warmer because the science is not "credible" - what then of the more recent science proving the earth has been cooling?
,,,
What is UAH? Nevermind. Your graph shows TEMPERATURE variations. TEMPERATURE has zero to do with global warming or cooling trends.
Oh Gawd...so much science, so little time. Maybe you can take a little time out, Sinata, and browse through this simple Q&A which will debunk many of your concerns, unless of course, you're more willing to believe a bunch of anonymous emails ahead of NASA, NOAA, and hundreds of other independent research calculations.
Global Warming FAQs - Understanding Climate Change - Frequently Asked Questions - NCAR & UCAR News Center
What is UAH? Nevermind. Your graph shows TEMPERATURE variations. TEMPERATURE has zero to do with global warming or cooling trends.
Oh Gawd...so much science, so little time. Maybe you can take a little time out, Sinata, and browse through this simple Q&A which will debunk many of your concerns, unless of course, you're more willing to believe a bunch of anonymous emails ahead of NASA, NOAA, and hundreds of other independent research calculations.
Global Warming FAQs - Understanding Climate Change - Frequently Asked Questions - NCAR & UCAR News Center
Ah, so 30 years of data is not a trend???
And those emails were "anonymous"????
You really have no clue what you are talking about do you???
Sarah Palin is at it again - speaking with clear conviction on the sham science behind the man-made global warming leap-of-faith religion in a recent column in the Washington Post...
____
Copenhagen's political science
By Sarah Palin
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
With the publication of damaging e-mails from a climate research center in Britain, the radical environmental movement appears to face a tipping point. The revelation of appalling actions by so-called climate change experts allows the American public to finally understand the concerns so many of us have articulated on this issue.
...The e-mails reveal that leading climate "experts" deliberately destroyed records, manipulated data to "hide the decline" in global temperatures, and tried to silence their critics by preventing them from publishing in peer-reviewed journals. What's more, the documents show that there was no real consensus even within the CRU crowd. Some scientists had strong doubts about the accuracy of estimates of temperatures from centuries ago, estimates used to back claims that more recent temperatures are rising at an alarming rate.
...In his inaugural address, President Obama declared his intention to "restore science to its rightful place." But instead of staying home from Copenhagen and sending a message that the United States will not be a party to fraudulent scientific practices, the president has upped the ante. He plans to fly in at the climax of the conference in hopes of sealing a "deal." Whatever deal he gets, it will be no deal for the American people. What Obama really hopes to bring home from Copenhagen is more pressure to pass the Democrats' cap-and-tax proposal. This is a political move. The last thing America needs is misguided legislation that will raise taxes and cost jobs -- particularly when the push for such legislation rests on agenda-driven science.
Without trustworthy science and with so much at stake, Americans should be wary about what comes out of this politicized conference. The president should boycott Copenhagen.
____
Full article here:
washingtonpost.com
You wish to discount the science showing the earth being considerably warmer because the science is not "credible" - what then of the more recent science proving the earth has been cooling?
,,,
What is UAH? Nevermind. Your graph shows TEMPERATURE variations. TEMPERATURE has zero to do with global warming or cooling trends.
Oh Gawd...so much science, so little time. Maybe you can take a little time out, Sinata, and browse through this simple Q&A which will debunk many of your concerns, unless of course, you're more willing to believe a bunch of anonymous emails ahead of NASA, NOAA, and hundreds of other independent research calculations.
Global Warming FAQs - Understanding Climate Change - Frequently Asked Questions - NCAR & UCAR News Center
I mean where in the heck are all the new palm trees that should be popping up everywhere due to your global warming theory?
Sarah Palin is at it again - speaking with clear conviction on the sham science behind the man-made global warming leap-of-faith religion in a recent column in the Washington Post...
____
Copenhagen's political science
By Sarah Palin
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
With the publication of damaging e-mails from a climate research center in Britain, the radical environmental movement appears to face a tipping point. The revelation of appalling actions by so-called climate change experts allows the American public to finally understand the concerns so many of us have articulated on this issue.
...The e-mails reveal that leading climate "experts" deliberately destroyed records, manipulated data to "hide the decline" in global temperatures, and tried to silence their critics by preventing them from publishing in peer-reviewed journals. What's more, the documents show that there was no real consensus even within the CRU crowd. Some scientists had strong doubts about the accuracy of estimates of temperatures from centuries ago, estimates used to back claims that more recent temperatures are rising at an alarming rate.
...In his inaugural address, President Obama declared his intention to "restore science to its rightful place." But instead of staying home from Copenhagen and sending a message that the United States will not be a party to fraudulent scientific practices, the president has upped the ante. He plans to fly in at the climax of the conference in hopes of sealing a "deal." Whatever deal he gets, it will be no deal for the American people. What Obama really hopes to bring home from Copenhagen is more pressure to pass the Democrats' cap-and-tax proposal. This is a political move. The last thing America needs is misguided legislation that will raise taxes and cost jobs -- particularly when the push for such legislation rests on agenda-driven science.
Without trustworthy science and with so much at stake, Americans should be wary about what comes out of this politicized conference. The president should boycott Copenhagen.
____
Full article here:
washingtonpost.com
It's to late the EPA plans to enforce restrictions on power plants on this coming Monday--which will shut down many power plants that cannot afford to retro-fit. This meaning sky-rocketing energy prices to all of us--regardless of Cap & Tax bill.
View attachment 8957
You know if Al gore and all those who promote( global warming is caused by man's activities) theory would you not think that they would try to REDUCE their carbon foot print, instead of flying around on privates jets, driving limos and town cars.
You wish to discount the science showing the earth being considerably warmer because the science is not "credible" - what then of the more recent science proving the earth has been cooling?
,,,
What is UAH? Nevermind. Your graph shows TEMPERATURE variations. TEMPERATURE has zero to do with global warming or cooling trends.
Oh Gawd...so much science, so little time. Maybe you can take a little time out, Sinata, and browse through this simple Q&A which will debunk many of your concerns, unless of course, you're more willing to believe a bunch of anonymous emails ahead of NASA, NOAA, and hundreds of other independent research calculations.
Global Warming FAQs - Understanding Climate Change - Frequently Asked Questions - NCAR & UCAR News Center
Here is what you just stated: TEMPERATURE has zero to do with global warming or cooling trends. 
So badly--that you're now trying to disassociate what temperature has to do with hot & cold--LOL 
