Pelosi's insider trader scandal

[LordBrownTrout]

This YouTube video is wrong. Imagine that.

Insider trading was never legal for Congress but just to assuage fears the STOCK act makes it 100% clear.

Section 4 says it all.

https://www.congress.gov/112/statute/STATUTE-126/STATUTE-126-Pg291.pdf

You're naive if you think the foxes are going to police themselves.

Congress Cashes in on Insider Trading

Just 12 days before the 2008 economic meltdown, members of Congress pulled their money out of the stock market.

represent.us

 

[pknopp]

It’s not a $200 fine. It’s the same penalty anyone else would get.

You’re probably confusing a penalty for non-disclosure.

Proving insider trading is always difficult. You say you have clear examples, but there’s probably little if any concrete evidence to back it up.

Always with the excuses. The only reason is because Congress has NO desire to actually make it illegal and the electorate has no desire to actually hold politicians accountable.

It would not be difficult to prove. Pelosi knew ahead of time what actions were about to happen and sold the stock. Clear and plain insider trading.

Charges? never.

 

[Marener]

You're naive if you think the foxes are going to police themselves.

Congress doesn’t police itself. The DoJ and SEC do.

 

[pknopp]

Congress doesn’t police itself. The DoJ and SEC do.

Nobody does.

 

[Marener]

Always with the excuses. The only reason is because Congress has NO desire to actually make it illegal and the electorate has no desire to actually hold politicians accountable.

It would not be difficult to prove. Pelosi knew ahead of time what actions were about to happen and sold the stock. Clear and plain insider trading.

Charges? never.

Can you prove that Pelosi knew about the DoJ lawsuit?

 

[konradv]

Trump calls for Nancy Pelosi to be ‘prosecuted’ over husband’s $500K Visa stock trade

“You think it was luck? I don’t,” Trump said.

nypost.com

By Victor Nava New York Post
President Donald Trump said Thursday he believes Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) “should be prosecuted” over her husband’s Visa stock trades ahead of a Justice Department lawsuit against the credit card giant.

“Nancy Pelosi has a little problem because her husband sold their Visa stock – they had a lot of Visa stock – one day before it was announced that Visa is being sued by the Department of Justice,” the GOP nominee said during a press conference at Trump Tower in New York.

The former House speaker’s husband, Paul Pelosi, unloaded 2,000 shares of Visa stock worth between $500,000 and $1 million on July 1, financial disclosures show.

“Think of that. Nancy Pelosi sold vast amounts of Visa stock one day before the big lawsuit that we all read about a few days ago,” he said.

“You think it was luck? I don’t.”

“She should be prosecuted,” Trump declared. “Nancy Pelosi should be prosecuted for that.”

“Speaker Pelosi does not own any stocks, and she has no prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,” a spokesperson for Nancy told The Post earlier this week.

Comment:
What can you say?
Pelosi is a liar and a cheater.
Of course she tipped off her husband.

View attachment 1018603

Would the Republicans have let a Democrat get away with praising an adversary in front of an ally? No matter how opposed to the Iraq War a Democrat may have been, they didn’t praise Saddam.



#STOPSATTHEBORDER

 

[pknopp]

Can you prove that Pelosi knew about the DoJ lawsuit?

Me? I certainly don't have access to that information but many others do.

 

[struth]

From P Diddy, to Xiden, to Nancy P and Weinstein.....Demafascsit elites are all corrupt

 

[Marener]

Me? I certainly don't have access to that information but many others do.

Seems like it’s pretty fundamental to the case, but you’re not even sure if it’s true or not.

 

[BluesLegend]

Right, congress will police itself...

 

[BluesLegend]

Can you prove that Pelosi knew about the DoJ lawsuit?

It's all just a coincidence...that's happened dozens of times.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Congress doesn’t police itself. The DoJ and SEC do.

No, they don't.

 

[Marener]

No, they don't.

Ask Chris Collins. At least until Trump pardoned him that is

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No, they don't.

They sure do. Do a Google search.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

How to Pick Stocks Like You’re in Congress

The team at Autopilot, an app that lets you copy the trades of Nancy Pelosi’s husband (up forty-five per cent last year) or Dan Crenshaw (up forty-one), choose their newest offering.

www.newyorker.com

 

[pknopp]

Ask Chris Collins. At least until Trump pardoned him that is

Despite being accused of lying to the FBI he was re-elected.

(an accusation he ended up pleading guilty over)

 

[LordBrownTrout]

They sure do. Do a Google search.

^^Another naive lover of big govt^^ Yeah, sure they do. Geesh.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

^^Another naive lover of big govt^^ Yeah, sure they do. Geesh.

Again, Google it. You will find several cases.

As it turns out.. your first, cynical gut feeling is usually.wrong.

 

[Nobody911]

Trump calls for Nancy Pelosi to be ‘prosecuted’ over husband’s $500K Visa stock trade

“You think it was luck? I don’t,” Trump said.

nypost.com

By Victor Nava New York Post
President Donald Trump said Thursday he believes Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) “should be prosecuted” over her husband’s Visa stock trades ahead of a Justice Department lawsuit against the credit card giant.

“Nancy Pelosi has a little problem because her husband sold their Visa stock – they had a lot of Visa stock – one day before it was announced that Visa is being sued by the Department of Justice,” the GOP nominee said during a press conference at Trump Tower in New York.

The former House speaker’s husband, Paul Pelosi, unloaded 2,000 shares of Visa stock worth between $500,000 and $1 million on July 1, financial disclosures show.

“Think of that. Nancy Pelosi sold vast amounts of Visa stock one day before the big lawsuit that we all read about a few days ago,” he said.

“You think it was luck? I don’t.”

“She should be prosecuted,” Trump declared. “Nancy Pelosi should be prosecuted for that.”

“Speaker Pelosi does not own any stocks, and she has no prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,” a spokesperson for Nancy told The Post earlier this week.

Comment:
What can you say?
Pelosi is a liar and a cheater.
Of course she tipped off her husband.

View attachment 1018603

Corruption can sometimes involve lobbying in the US, where special interests use money or influence to gain favorable treatment. Insiders, such as politicians or corporate executives, may be involved in these corrupt practices to advance their own agendas.

However, not all lobbying is corrupt or illegal; it is a legal way for groups to advocate for their interests. The issue arises when there is an abuse of power or unethical behavior involved in the lobbying process. Transparency and accountability are crucial in ensuring that lobbying activities are conducted ethically and in the public interest.

Regulations and oversight mechanisms are in place to prevent corruption and hold wrongdoers accountable. It is essential for a functioning democracy to address and combat corrupt practices to uphold the integrity of the political system and protect the public interest.

Corrupt politicians or insiders in the US are typically held responsible by law enforcement agencies such as the FBI, Department of Justice, and the Securities and Exchange Commission. These agencies investigate and prosecute cases of corruption, fraud, and misconduct in politics.

Additionally, oversight bodies like the Office of Government Ethics and the House Ethics Committee play a role in ensuring accountability and ethical behavior among politicians. Responsibility for corrupt practices often lies with the individuals involved, as well as the systems and structures that enable or tolerate such behavior.

Political pressure, lack of transparency, and inadequate enforcement mechanisms can all contribute to corruption in politics.

Ultimately, addressing corruption requires a multi-faceted approach involving strong enforcement of existing laws, increased transparency and accountability measures, and a commitment to ethical governance at all levels of government. Citizens also play a crucial role in holding politicians accountable through voting, advocacy, and demanding ethical behavior from their elected representatives.

The FBI and other agencies appear to be turning a blind eye to what has occurred, so it is time for US citizens to wield their influence in the upcoming election!

 

[Captain Caveman]

The feds have been investigating Pelosi and her husband for years but it isn't going anywhere because democrats are in charge of the investigation. That's one of the reasons democrats hate and fear a Trump administration.

Well, let's see from the 20th