Progressive Propaganda: The Media Edition

Again, that’s not even coherent sentence. For starters, there should be a “$” in from of 778.

I think you get drunk and then hit USMB. That’s the only thing I can think of for why you sound like an illiterate, Trump Derangement Syndrome suffering, spaz.
How’s mat gaetz?
 
I have no idea…I don’t know the man. Never even met him. You Trump Derangement Syndrome mental illness causes you to post bizarre questions that make 0 sense.
Tussi gabbert traded in Russian disinformation and she gets to head our intelligence agencies?

Russia Russia Russia


May Ukraine rest a Russian Gulag…
 
Tussi gabbert traded in Russian disinformation and she gets to head our intelligence agencies?
1.Never happened (your Trump Derangement Syndrome is flaring again)

2. Elections have consequences. The Democrat Party shouldn’t have morphed into a filthy, unethical, depraved, fascist party. You deserve whatever happens.
 
1.Never happened (your Trump Derangement Syndrome is flaring again)

2. Elections have consequences. The Democrat Party shouldn’t have morphed into a filthy, unethical, depraved, fascist party. You deserve whatever happens.
It’s actually maga which will get the shaft as that’s what you want.
 
Bet the lunar landing in 1969 was fake too.
Again…facts (links to video, audio, documents, etc,) have left you with nothing. Weird how the truth just pisses you off.

I guess realizing you were easily duped is a tough spill to swallow. So is realizing everything you believed in and worshipped, was all a big lie.
 
Again…facts (links to video, audio, documents, etc,) have left you with nothing. Weird how the truth just pisses you off.

I guess realizing you were easily duped is a tough spill to swallow. So is realizing everything you believed in and worshipped, was all a big lie.
I bet you believe there were multiple shooters in Dallas too. That there was a magic bullet.
 
I bet you believe there were multiple shooters in Dallas too. That there was a magic bullet.
Those two things contradict each other 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

If there were “multiple shooters”, that disproves the “magic bullet” theory (which is a lone shooter theory)
 
Those two things contradict each other 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

If there were “multiple shooters”, that disproves the “magic bullet” theory (which is a lone shooter theory)
Hilarious
 
Hilarious
More sad than “hilarious”. You contradict yourself in every post. Either you have a serious drinking problem or you have the IQ of a garden snail. Either one is not good.
 
More sad than “hilarious”. You contradict yourself in every post. Either you have a serious drinking problem or you have the IQ of a garden snail. Either one is not good.
Hilarious pat

Was the FBI responsible for the JFK assassination or not?
 
Was the FBI responsible for the JFK assassination or not?
The F.B.I.??? 🤣

Let me preface this by stating, I do not have a national security clearance and as such, I have not seen the remaining classified documents on the Kennedy Assassination.

With that being said, to the best of my knowledge, the F.B.I. had absolutely nothing to do with the JFK assassination. Could the documents prove otherwise? Sure. Anything is possible.

But what does any of that have to do with the “mainstream media” being exposed (behind a shadow of a doubt) as pushing pure propaganda 24x7?
 
Anyone who turns to mainstream media sources for “news” is intentionally seeking propaganda at this point…
Speculation over Officer Sicknick's death was the source of widespread misinformation after the New York Times reported erroneously that protesters had bludgeoned him with a fire extinguisher - a claim the newspaper later retracted.
It’s completely impossible to get a story that wrong. Brian Sicknick was never struck at all - by anything. So the only to submit a story that he was “bludgeoned” to death is because the leftists of the New York Times wanted it to be true. They didn’t care about the facts. They cared about influencing the mindless-minions of the left who are easily duped.

 
Anyone who turns to mainstream media sources for “news” is intentionally seeking propaganda at this point…

It’s completely impossible to get a story that wrong. Brian Sicknick was never struck at all - by anything. So the only to submit a story that he was “bludgeoned” to death is because the leftists of the New York Times wanted it to be true. They didn’t care about the facts. They cared about influencing the mindless-minions of the left who are easily duped.

Wikipedia STILL has it as a fact that he died in the line of duty. . . but also died of natural causes?

This makes not a lick of sense.


And this;

". . . The USCP accepts the findings from the District of Columbia's Office of the Chief Medical Examiner that Officer Brian Sicknick died of natural causes. This does not change the fact Officer Sicknick died in the line of duty, courageously defending Congress and the Capitol. . . "

wtf does that even mean? They admit he died of natural causes. . . but he was killed in the line of duty?

9hliec.gif
 
Anyone who turns to mainstream media sources for “news” is intentionally seeking propaganda at this point…

It’s completely impossible to get a story that wrong. Brian Sicknick was never struck at all - by anything. So the only to submit a story that he was “bludgeoned” to death is because the leftists of the New York Times wanted it to be true. They didn’t care about the facts. They cared about influencing the mindless-minions of the left who are easily duped.

Yeah, it’s better to get your information from a biased news source in the corner of the Internet
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom