Putin says 'patriotic' hackers may have mounted attacks on US election

Political Junky

Gold Member
May 27, 2009
25,793
3,990
Is Trump's pal, Putin, making Trump look like the fool he is?

Putin denies a Russian state role in U.S. election, but says 'patriotic' hackers may have mounted attacks

After months of categorically denying Russian involvement in cyberattacks during last year’s U.S. presidential election, Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday that although the Kremlin has never used state-sponsored cyberattacks to meddle in other countries’ elections, some “patriotically minded” volunteer hackers may have acted on their own to defend Russian interests.

“Hackers can be anywhere and pop out from anywhere in the world,” Putin said in an address to Russian and foreign media during the opening day of an annual economic forum in St. Petersburg, Russia.

The Russian president compared hackers to artists who can act creatively, particularly when they are motivated by international relations and in the defense of Russia’s interests.
<more>
 
Last edited:
Is Trump's pal, Putin, making Trump look like the fool he is?

Putin denies a Russian state role in U.S. election, but says 'patriotic' hackers may have mounted attacks

After months of categorically denying Russian involvement in cyberattacks during last year’s U.S. presidential election, Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday that although the Kremlin has never used state-sponsored cyberattacks to meddle in other countries’ elections, some “patriotically minded” volunteer hackers may have acted on their own to defend Russian interests.

“Hackers can be anywhere and pop out from anywhere in the world,” Putin said in an address to Russian and foreign media during the opening day of an annual economic forum in St. Petersburg, Russia.

The Russian president compared hackers to artists who can act creatively, particularly when they are motivated by international relations and in the defense of Russia’s interests.
<more>


He just wants to spin Hillary the Hag up again - such fun.
 
Is Trump's pal, Putin, making Trump look like the fool he is?

Putin denies a Russian state role in U.S. election, but says 'patriotic' hackers may have mounted attacks

After months of categorically denying Russian involvement in cyberattacks during last year’s U.S. presidential election, Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday that although the Kremlin has never used state-sponsored cyberattacks to meddle in other countries’ elections, some “patriotically minded” volunteer hackers may have acted on their own to defend Russian interests.

“Hackers can be anywhere and pop out from anywhere in the world,” Putin said in an address to Russian and foreign media during the opening day of an annual economic forum in St. Petersburg, Russia.

The Russian president compared hackers to artists who can act creatively, particularly when they are motivated by international relations and in the defense of Russia’s interests.
<more>
Being an old Hacker who had to do it to get programs to work they are a fun bunch to hang with. Hackers have a good sense of humor and just love the challenge to break down the code. and unlock the program. Its just human nature to open locked door just to see what is on the other side.
 
Nobody denies that the Russians and US continually spy on each other.
Spy vs Spy has gone on for ages.
But the spying tried on both parties was for info and intelligence gathering with no proof of changing the election.
When we create a fake narrative about the intent and usage of that spying, then that is propaganda used to demonize an opponent, which ironically is the claim Clinton camp has about the Russians, that they made her look bad(even though it wasn't them doing that part)instead of her own acts and emails made her look bad. When you have a person who's mantra is "admit nothing, displace all blame", you will find a scapegoat is necessary, a demon to blame it all on to rally anger against this demon to displace and deflect all acts and blame. Hence why every single thing they accuse are actually
revealing the mirror reflection of themselves.

So we have typical spying, but the one who stole the email was not Russian nor of the Kremlin's covert opp. It was supposed to be a Romanian who hacked the DNC not Russians, but some think it was Clinton's Pakistani IT guys and 1 lady who obtained the emails.
The one who sent the emails to wikileaks was not Russian or of a foreign entity.
Obviously someone thought Seth Rich was the DNC whistleblower, enough to have him killed and covered up with a highly insulting robbery report(how do you call it a robbery when nothing is stolen?=coverup).
Whoever gave the emails to wikileaks, it's wikileaks not Russians who released the info and only Hillary herself created those emails and failed the law in turning them over creating those releases. Blaming Russians for her email is outright ludicrous and delusional.
Now she and some Dems also try to blame the Russians for spreading fake news.
Whatttt? That's all she ran on doing, no policy, just lying about everything about her opponent=deflecting again.
Not every fake news story comes from one group of people, that's a xenophobic thing to say, which ironically is what they ran snipets on, scaring Mexicans about Donald, through using fake narratives. Fake news can come from all people in all nations, mere civilians voicing their opinions online as the rights to free speach, sometimes satirical, and sometimes taking poetic license to create questions.
Labeling them all Russian plots is similar to them calling all the Soros plots & blame conspiratorial nonsense
If 1 person from each 196 nations were to stretch a story with fake news, and the one Russian was a civilian no ties to the Kremlin, the Dems would selectively use the 1 out of the 196 to claim "the Russians" put out propaganda. Ignoring the 195 nations civilians who voiced their opinions.
=selective recognition is used to manipulate people in both religious and political propaganda.

So now we see, the false Russian narrative created is a deflection from a psychopathic lying habitual criminal which her own daughter had investigated. And assisted by a Chicago mobster influenced ex president who has an immature vindictive nature.
And add party traitor John McCain who also has a hurt ego vendetta, which nobody understands what his problem is.
 
Last edited:
Nobody denies that the Russians and US continually spy on each other.
Spy vs Spy has gone on for ages.
But the spying tried on both parties was for info and intelligence gathering with no proof of changing the election.
When we create a fake narrative about the intent and usage of that spying, then that is propaganda used to demonize an opponent, which ironically is the claim Clinton camp has about the Russians, that they made her look bad(even though it wasn't them doing that part)instead of her own acts and emails made her look bad. When you have a person who's mantra is "admit nothing, displace all blame", you will find a scapegoat is necessary, a demon to blame it all on to rally anger against this demon to displace and deflect all acts and blame. Hence why every single thing they accuse are actually
revealing the mirror reflection of themselves.

So we have typical spying, but the one who stole the email was not Russian nor of the Kremlin's covert opp. It was supposed to be a Romanian who hacked the DNC not Russians, but some think it was Clinton's Pakistani IT guys and 1 lady who obtained the emails.
The one who sent the emails to wikileaks was not Russian or of a foreign entity.
Obviously someone thought Seth Rich was the DNC whistleblower, enough to have him killed and covered up with a highly insulting robbery report(how do you call it a robbery when nothing is stolen?=coverup).
Whoever gave the emails to wikileaks, it's wikileaks not Russians who released the info and only Hillary herself created those emails and failed the law in turning them over creating those releases. Blaming Russians for her email is outright ludicrous and delusional.
Now she and some Dems also try to blame the Russians for spreading fake news.
Whatttt? That's all she ran on doing, no policy, just lying about everything about her opponent=deflecting again.
Not every fake news story comes from one group of people, that's a xenophobic thing to say, which ironically is what they ran snipets on, scaring Mexicans about Donald, through using fake narratives. Fake news can come from all people in all nations, mere civilians voicing their opinions online as the rights to free speach, sometimes satirical, and sometimes taking poetic license to create questions.
Labeling them all Russian plots is similar to them calling all the Soros plots & blame conspiratorial nonsense
If 1 person from each 196 nations were to stretch a story with fake news, and the one Russian was a civilian no ties to the Kremlin, the Dems would selectively use the 1 out of the 196 to claim "the Russians" put out propaganda. Ignoring the 195 nations civilians who voiced their opinions.
=selective recognition is used to manipulate people in both religious and political propaganda.

So now we see, the false Russian narrative created is a deflection from a psychopathic lying habitual criminal which her own daughter had investigated. And assisted by a Chicago mobster influenced ex president who has an immature vindictive nature.
And add party traitor John McCain who also has a hurt ego vendetta, which nobody understands what his problem is.

Are you being paid to create this false narrative?

Newsweek interviewed a Russian hacker just after the election, who claimed that he hacked the DNC and would be happy to talk to US law enforcement about it but nobody is calling him.

Putin also claimed that the "pro-Russian rebels" in the Ukraine were just patriotic Ukrainian nationals who were being true to their Russian roots, and wanting the Ukraine returned to Russia where it belongs.

That they were driving Russian army trucks and carrying Russian army equipment and wearing Russian army uniforms with the insignia removed, is neither here nor there.

Putin wanted an end to NATO, and he's got it. Donnie Darko delivered. Now to get those pesky sanctions lifted.
 
Nobody denies that the Russians and US continually spy on each other.
Spy vs Spy has gone on for ages.
But the spying tried on both parties was for info and intelligence gathering with no proof of changing the election.
When we create a fake narrative about the intent and usage of that spying, then that is propaganda used to demonize an opponent, which ironically is the claim Clinton camp has about the Russians, that they made her look bad(even though it wasn't them doing that part)instead of her own acts and emails made her look bad. When you have a person who's mantra is "admit nothing, displace all blame", you will find a scapegoat is necessary, a demon to blame it all on to rally anger against this demon to displace and deflect all acts and blame. Hence why every single thing they accuse are actually
revealing the mirror reflection of themselves.

So we have typical spying, but the one who stole the email was not Russian nor of the Kremlin's covert opp. It was supposed to be a Romanian who hacked the DNC not Russians, but some think it was Clinton's Pakistani IT guys and 1 lady who obtained the emails.
The one who sent the emails to wikileaks was not Russian or of a foreign entity.
Obviously someone thought Seth Rich was the DNC whistleblower, enough to have him killed and covered up with a highly insulting robbery report(how do you call it a robbery when nothing is stolen?=coverup).
Whoever gave the emails to wikileaks, it's wikileaks not Russians who released the info and only Hillary herself created those emails and failed the law in turning them over creating those releases. Blaming Russians for her email is outright ludicrous and delusional.
Now she and some Dems also try to blame the Russians for spreading fake news.
Whatttt? That's all she ran on doing, no policy, just lying about everything about her opponent=deflecting again.
Not every fake news story comes from one group of people, that's a xenophobic thing to say, which ironically is what they ran snipets on, scaring Mexicans about Donald, through using fake narratives. Fake news can come from all people in all nations, mere civilians voicing their opinions online as the rights to free speach, sometimes satirical, and sometimes taking poetic license to create questions.
Labeling them all Russian plots is similar to them calling all the Soros plots & blame conspiratorial nonsense
If 1 person from each 196 nations were to stretch a story with fake news, and the one Russian was a civilian no ties to the Kremlin, the Dems would selectively use the 1 out of the 196 to claim "the Russians" put out propaganda. Ignoring the 195 nations civilians who voiced their opinions.
=selective recognition is used to manipulate people in both religious and political propaganda.

So now we see, the false Russian narrative created is a deflection from a psychopathic lying habitual criminal which her own daughter had investigated. And assisted by a Chicago mobster influenced ex president who has an immature vindictive nature.
And add party traitor John McCain who also has a hurt ego vendetta, which nobody understands what his problem is.

Are you being paid to create this false narrative?

Newsweek interviewed a Russian hacker just after the election, who claimed that he hacked the DNC and would be happy to talk to US law enforcement about it but nobody is calling him.

Putin also claimed that the "pro-Russian rebels" in the Ukraine were just patriotic Ukrainian nationals who were being true to their Russian roots, and wanting the Ukraine returned to Russia where it belongs.

That they were driving Russian army trucks and carrying Russian army equipment and wearing Russian army uniforms with the insignia removed, is neither here nor there.

Putin wanted an end to NATO, and he's got it. Donnie Darko delivered. Now to get those pesky sanctions lifted.

Even Clinton admitted it was the Romanian, she proved my post as well when she called the single lone Romanian citizen the "Macedonians" conspiring with Russia.
By the way most proxys are in China and Russia that I'm sure most hackers use.
And they can spoof or change their dns address. This is why some even claim members of our own intelligence community did the hacking, maybe under criminal investigation maybe in the name of justice?
Your paranoia in questioning if I am being paid to post also proves my point.
 
Nobody denies that the Russians and US continually spy on each other.
Spy vs Spy has gone on for ages.
But the spying tried on both parties was for info and intelligence gathering with no proof of changing the election.
When we create a fake narrative about the intent and usage of that spying, then that is propaganda used to demonize an opponent, which ironically is the claim Clinton camp has about the Russians, that they made her look bad(even though it wasn't them doing that part)instead of her own acts and emails made her look bad. When you have a person who's mantra is "admit nothing, displace all blame", you will find a scapegoat is necessary, a demon to blame it all on to rally anger against this demon to displace and deflect all acts and blame. Hence why every single thing they accuse are actually
revealing the mirror reflection of themselves.

So we have typical spying, but the one who stole the email was not Russian nor of the Kremlin's covert opp. It was supposed to be a Romanian who hacked the DNC not Russians, but some think it was Clinton's Pakistani IT guys and 1 lady who obtained the emails.
The one who sent the emails to wikileaks was not Russian or of a foreign entity.
Obviously someone thought Seth Rich was the DNC whistleblower, enough to have him killed and covered up with a highly insulting robbery report(how do you call it a robbery when nothing is stolen?=coverup).
Whoever gave the emails to wikileaks, it's wikileaks not Russians who released the info and only Hillary herself created those emails and failed the law in turning them over creating those releases. Blaming Russians for her email is outright ludicrous and delusional.
Now she and some Dems also try to blame the Russians for spreading fake news.
Whatttt? That's all she ran on doing, no policy, just lying about everything about her opponent=deflecting again.
Not every fake news story comes from one group of people, that's a xenophobic thing to say, which ironically is what they ran snipets on, scaring Mexicans about Donald, through using fake narratives. Fake news can come from all people in all nations, mere civilians voicing their opinions online as the rights to free speach, sometimes satirical, and sometimes taking poetic license to create questions.
Labeling them all Russian plots is similar to them calling all the Soros plots & blame conspiratorial nonsense
If 1 person from each 196 nations were to stretch a story with fake news, and the one Russian was a civilian no ties to the Kremlin, the Dems would selectively use the 1 out of the 196 to claim "the Russians" put out propaganda. Ignoring the 195 nations civilians who voiced their opinions.
=selective recognition is used to manipulate people in both religious and political propaganda.

So now we see, the false Russian narrative created is a deflection from a psychopathic lying habitual criminal which her own daughter had investigated. And assisted by a Chicago mobster influenced ex president who has an immature vindictive nature.
And add party traitor John McCain who also has a hurt ego vendetta, which nobody understands what his problem is.

Are you being paid to create this false narrative?

Newsweek interviewed a Russian hacker just after the election, who claimed that he hacked the DNC and would be happy to talk to US law enforcement about it but nobody is calling him.

Putin also claimed that the "pro-Russian rebels" in the Ukraine were just patriotic Ukrainian nationals who were being true to their Russian roots, and wanting the Ukraine returned to Russia where it belongs.

That they were driving Russian army trucks and carrying Russian army equipment and wearing Russian army uniforms with the insignia removed, is neither here nor there.

Putin wanted an end to NATO, and he's got it. Donnie Darko delivered. Now to get those pesky sanctions lifted.
Now explain how PRESIDENT TRUMP!!!!! brought about the "end to NATO" asshole!
By doing what BONOBO did when he DEMANDED that NATO countries at least pay the share they had promised?
Fucking Germany is the richest industrial country in europe and has 'promised to begin paying its fair share in about six years from now.
These NATO countries are fucking leeches and in the past they KNEW they could get away with having the good old USA suckers AKA the TAXPAYERs pony up the money to protect these leeches. NO MORE FREE RIDES!!!!!
That's what PRESIDENT TRUMP promised the american people and he's standing up and keeping his promises........as much as it pisses the fucking LIB pussies off.
 

Forum List

Back
Top