Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Accidents happen. The trick is to give them back and acknowledge the mistake. That's what prevents you from getting indicted for it.
You know, everything the other guy DIDN'T do.![]()
No shit.....OK say his staff did gather them up, well that means he had to personally steal them from the SCIF in the first place.Oh? STEALING documents from a SCIF while a senator doesn't count as intent?
You're an idiot.
thats what they told us right?.....sorry cant trust them.....That's nice. But since Biden didn't deliberately take them, it isn't a crime. Heck, Biden didn't take them at all. His staffers accidentally packed them up.
Trump cultists always leave that part out. They have to. It's part of their BigLie campaign.
No shit.....OK say his staff did gather them up, well that means he had to personally steal them from the SCIF in the first place.
Then they sat around in various places under Biden's control at his property (or one he had a say in) for years.
He's the "big man" so he takes the fall, not some staffer.
That's nice. But since Biden didn't deliberately take them, it isn't a crime. Heck, Biden didn't take them at all. His staffers accidentally packed them up.
Trump cultists always leave that part out. They have to. It's part of their BigLie campaign.
Luttig, who was appointed to the bench by George H.W. Bush and was floated as a possible GOP Supreme Court pick, wrote on Tuesday night that any administration, Democratic or Republican, would have charged Trump for violating the Espionage Act and other federal statutes:EX Conservative Judge Puts Trump in his place= any AG would indict Trump Under the circumstances
![]()
Conservative ex-judge: Trump ‘dared’ DOJ to prosecute him
Former federal Judge J. Michael Luttig is putting Donald Trump in his place — and making a record — once again.www.msnbc.com
You do understand that a SCIF is only required for Top Secret documents, right?Oh? STEALING documents from a SCIF while a senator doesn't count as intent?
Luttig, who was appointed to the bench by George H.W. Bush and was floated as a possible GOP Supreme Court pick, wrote on Tuesday night that any administration, Democratic or Republican, would have charged Trump for violating the Espionage Act and other federal statutes:
Indeed, following Trump's arraignment, Luttig wrote that the defendant “dared, taunted, provoked, and goaded” Smith and his team to bring charges:
Echoing points I’ve made here on the Deadline: Legal Blog that Trump’s alleged obstruction is likely what put him over the edge into charging territory, Luttig wrote that Trump “could have avoided and prevented this prosecution” and “would never have been indicted for taking these documents.”
The former federal judge’s point aligns with past Justice Department practice, as I’ve noted in explaining why others who’ve cooperated in classified documents investigations — such as Pence — haven’t been charged but Trump has.
Luttig’s lessons likely won’t reach Trump supporters as they desperately mount avant-garde legal defenses by misreading and misapplying the Presidential Records Act and prior precedent.
But it’s nonetheless important to make these points — not only for those willing to hear them but for the historical record as well.
You do understand that a SCIF is only required for Top Secret documents, right?
You probably do, but you won't acknowledge it. You just love telling that SCIF lie too much to ever stop telling it.
Because Trump admitted to ordering that they be packed up and taken. Duh.What evidence have you that Trump deliberately took them, while Biden is just an innocent bystander?
Sweet Jeebus, you cranks are stupid. Can you not read basic English?And Biden has found to be in possession of classified documents from his days as a Senator. Meaning, he stole them from a SCIF.
Afteer you all got busted for lying about Trump's Russian connections so many times, I would think you'd want everyone to forget about your disgrace and humiliation there.Yep, after all the 'muh, Russia' lies
The Durham Report found nothing. Remember, you can only gaslight your fellow fascist cranks.and the Durham Report anything they allege against Trump is facially a lie.
This is a sign of other things. China has much of their technology that looks like ours.Sweet Jeebus, you cranks are stupid. Can you not read basic English?
No, every classified document does not have to come from a SCIF. Who told you such a stupid lie, and why did you fall for it?
That's nice. But since Biden didn't deliberately take them, it isn't a crime.
Afteer you all got busted for lying about Trump's Russian connections so many times, I would think you'd want everyone to forget about your disgrace and humiliation there.
The Durham Report found nothing. Remember, you can only gaslight your fellow fascist cranks.
You do understand that a SCIF is only required for Top Secret documents, right?
You probably do, but you won't acknowledge it. You just love telling that SCIF lie too much to ever stop telling it.