Restaurant rights Now!

[MaggieMae]

I have no idea what you're talking about. Photos of transformation? Huh?

I don't understand why you find it so difficult to comprehend my question or confusion.

First). I said PICTURES not PHOTOS.

Second). Normally, one has just one person, or thingamajig, displayed as an avatar. Not that plurality is necessarily outlawed. But if it is a PERSON .... then USUALLY it is ONE PERSON.

Third). You have doll-like replicas of FOUR people with progressive dates. Extremely UNUSUAL !!!

Four). These FOUR doll-like replicas seemingly, gradually (?) change their gender from masculine to feminine.

Five). Abnormal people i.e. "QUEERS", or "GAYS" have categories that they are very sensitive about. Such as the "transgendered" variety of freaks. etc. I confess that I don't know all the particulars pertaining to this esoteric topic.

Six). There is a STRONG POSSIBILITY that by having the pictures of FOUR doll-like replicas of people (used in the loose sense of the word) ..... and PROGRESSIVE DATES..... you were indicating the progression of a CHANGE from Masculine to Feminine.

Seven). As far as I know, ABNORMALS who have a confused state of GENDER IDENTIFICATION and/or FUNCTION...... in this particular case....AllieBaba.... may be trying to a represent itself as a LEZBO advertising its PROGRESSIVE gender transformation.

All this is/was very confusing to me. Hence my question: "Is Alliebaba trying to portray itself as a transformed LEZBO ?"

And, "WHY ??? "

Is this some sort of a display of an "OUT OF THE CLOSET" experience ???

Something more PROFOUND ?!?!?

Hence my curiosity.

And then there's the arm-pit smellers as her "signature." Allie Babba has definitely 'progressed' from smoking it to sticking it in her arm.

 

[MaggieMae]

You mean comparing people dying because of insurance companies refusing treatment while gambling that the ill will die before they can sue...comparing that to fine dining isn't just the cleverest thing you've seen since sliced bread?

Yeah, me neither.

There are many reason people justify taking money that doesn't belong to them under force of law.
That does not make it right not matter how noble you think the cause or how justified you think you are in taking other people property.

Then shut down the schools and the public highways.

I'm sorry, this has always been the silliest way to oppose public healthcare, in my opinion. It completely ignores the fact that collecting taxes and implementing public programs is what governments do, and are supposed to do. Attempting to compare it to absurdities accomplishes nothing, because reality is government programs exist and should exist. The question is whether this one is justified, not whether it's ok for the government "take other people's property" - also known as tax the populace. It's a foregone and established conclusion that government taxation is both right and justified in order to maintain a country. The only issues up for discussion are how much and what programs.

You're attempting logic on this bunch? Good luck with that...

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

A blind guy in NJ is suing a restaurant for being seated in the back with his dog. Apparently in NJ, you have the right to a "good table" as well.

Ok, if you're blind, what the fuck difference does it make? Would he get pissed if he didn't get a window seat too?

Asshole. Must be a professor at Harvard?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Next the deaf will be suing because there's no Mozart, only Bach?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I bet he didn't like the presentation either!

 

[Ringel05]

I want 5 Guys, burgers and fries delivered for breakfast, lunch and dinner. And make sure the burgers are cooked medium. Thank God I don't live in the Peoples Democratic Republic of Maryland.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

You mean comparing people dying because of insurance companies refusing treatment while gambling that the ill will die before they can sue...comparing that to fine dining isn't just the cleverest thing you've seen since sliced bread?

Yeah, me neither.

There are many reason people justify taking money that doesn't belong to them under force of law.
That does not make it right not matter how noble you think the cause or how justified you think you are in taking other people property.

Then shut down the schools and the public highways.

I'm sorry, this has always been the silliest way to oppose public healthcare, in my opinion. It completely ignores the fact that collecting taxes and implementing public programs is what governments do, and are supposed to do. Attempting to compare it to absurdities accomplishes nothing, because reality is government programs exist and should exist. The question is whether this one is justified, not whether it's ok for the government "take other people's property" - also known as tax the populace. It's a foregone and established conclusion that government taxation is both right and justified in order to maintain a country. The only issues up for discussion are how much and what programs.

Yes close the schools and leave them and the roads to the local and state governments.
Yes governments make programs until they come up with a program for every problem,
You may be one of them.
If you want a giant government that can give you everything remember they can take it away as well.
The debate is not over it may lead to the eradication of the Washington DC as the capitol and civil war but it is certainly not over.

 

[Gudrid]

Lol. Ok, so your plan is to do away with the American government entirely. Got it.

My mistake, MaggieMae. Live and learn.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Lol. Ok, so your plan is to do away with the American government entirely. Got it.

My mistake, MaggieMae. Live and learn.

My intention is to live under a constitutional government not a progressive socialist tyranny . We are able to learn from history, well some of us are.

 

[Fatality]

free fine dining leads to a healthier life and a happier population

 

[Gudrid]

If your intention is to live under this constitutional government, then my original point stands. The discussion lies in what is or is not an acceptable program, not in grandiose and meaningless statements about how the government is robbing you if they collect taxes.

So, under that premise, arguably, if you wanted to get technical about it, there's more constitutional justification for a public healthcare program than there are for public schools. Constitutionally, the federal government can protect against foreign invaders. In these days of biowarfare, it's not exactly a huge leap to say that public health care is fast becoming part of national security. Of course, if you want to get really technical about it, you can classify germs themselves as foreign invaders.

The bottom line being, the conversation is about individual belief. My personal belief is that the insurance companies have become the tyranny that this government exists to defend against, and they've done it in a particularly insidious manner. And those companies have killed people in that war for profit, without humanity and without hesitation. So callously, in fact, that there's decision makers in that industry who will joke about it.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Im not oppessed to taxes ,Im opposed to government over reaching it grounds.
I have no problem with the CDC. in the event of a biological attack, UHC will not have any impact those affected will die immediately or waiting for treatment which would come from FEMA and the military.

I had to wait 3 days for an MRI on a torn tendon in my elbow, another 2 days to see a specialist , I did not need to be pre approved .
I have very good insurance and it isnt free.

Health cost before insurance was at a reasonable price , now with technology prices have gone up and people join together to support the cost. There have been abuses , and that is unfortunate .

You do not throw out the baby with the bath water.

I have had to personally deal with the cost of some of them after I was dropped after a stroke.
I have new insurance sine then , I have to contend with the bills Oh well.

With the government getting into the mix they will eventually crush the free enterprise choice .
This will tighten the yoke of government further on unborn generations, limit choices and raise taxes.

I dont support that kind of scheme .

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

If you believe that the government will not ration healthcare the same way the private sector does , you are in for a big surprise .
It will just get worse and worse taxes piling up and worse coverage.
Try to think ahead don't be an ideologue find out who is planning the health care bill.
what have they said in the past.

 

[Fatality]

people will go to work and binrg home ZERO dollars, every penny will go to the government to pay for government schemes, people will effectivly be slaves and obama will be cracking the whip

 

[Fatality]

how about gym rights?

Elgin Declared Fattest City In Illinois, But Little Interest In 'Fitness Grants' - cbs2chicago.com

 

[Gudrid]

What about public parks?

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

What about public parks?

Auction them off to pay the debt.

 

[Gudrid]

Good plan. The Grand Canyon needs a few hot dog stands and slushie machines on the way down.

Do you feel public parks are constitutionally justifiable?

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Good plan. The Grand Canyon needs a few hot dog stands and slushie machines on the way down.

Do you feel public parks are constitutionally justifiable?

They should be state issues.
Federal intrusion into state business is one reason the fed is so huge .

 

[Gudrid]

That's interesting. So you consider it intrusive if it comes from the Federal government, but acceptable from the state government? Does that apply to health care as well? If a state were to enact this health plan at the state level, would that be acceptable to you?