JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,767
- Thread starter
- #21
I just want to comment that you seem to be a liberal, a classic liberal, and I appreciate your rational response and discussion, though I tend to disagree on this issue, your expression of your opinion is an interesting delight to read.Yeah, the good Bishop Berkeley made a similar argument centuries ago, but a good kick to any stone laying on the ground suggests otherwise.Correlation is not causation
When A almost always precedes B, more likely than not it is causation of some form.
While correlation does not prove causation necessarily, Causation always has correlation and correlation is a good indicator of where to start looking for causation.
No scientist ever said that looking for a cause should start with things one NEVER finds correlating with the effect.
In the case of the Breitbart ads, though, there doesn't even seem to be much correlation. Kelloggs dropped their Breitbart ads in November of 2016. According to the chart on Breitbart, in Nov. Kelloggs saw a brief jump in (sales? profits? market share? the chart doesn't specify) and then a brief drop, before leveling out into the slow decline it was already on. Did the company get a small bump from dropping the ads? Did it get a small drop? Did it get both? Did it have no effect? There's very little information there to go on.
What I've seen is that Kelloggs has been on a downward trend for profits since sometime in 2014. I haven't seen anything to indicate what effect stopping their advertising on Breitbart may have had, if any.
Welcome to my following list!
Last edited: