- Thread starter
- #21
Maybe the ninnies will learn to stop shooting themselves in the foot by 2012.
Part of me hopes for a Paul/Nader ticket in 2012.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe the ninnies will learn to stop shooting themselves in the foot by 2012.
By all means, do tell.
Because Republicans have been veering left for a LONG TIME now. They've abandoned most of their principles and have basically become Democrat-lites. As a result, the "mainstream" political spectrum in this country has become as thin as a piece of paper. Both parties want bigger gov't, more power, increased spending, and overseas interests ... the only difference where to increase the gov't, where to increase spending, and where to put another American footprint in the world.
Ron Paul reminded Republicans of how their party used to be and he did it in the national spotlight. This embarrassed and shamed the loyal GOPers and instead of owning up and admitting that Ron Paul was right about a lot of issues they chose to mock and ridicule him ... branding him a "kook."
And now they want his help ... lol ... I'm proud of The Paul for telling them to stuff it.
Now why in the hell did Paul run as a Republican ?
So, your contention is that the only people allowed in the republican party are those who think the Iraq War was a great idea, and that being belligerent to allied countries and adversaries alike is a wise foreign policy?
I was very disappointed that Bob Barr felt he was "too big" to attend Ron Paul's press conference today, especially after telling Paul that he would be there. I'm more disappointed in Bob Barr's campaign staff member implying that Ron Paul didn't believe in real liberty and that he was only in it for the money, simply because Paul didn't endorse Bob Barr. Also, Bob Barr has asked Ron Paul to replace Root as his Vice Presidential nominee, which I'm sure he knows Dr. Paul will decline.
Bob Barr and the Libertarian Party took many steps backwards today.
I'm not sure how anyone could conjure up the idea that Paul did anything "for the money".
I'd like to see a list of other politicians who have donated their unused campaign fund balances and paychecks to the US Treasury.
And when there was a vote being held on a medal for Rosa Parks, who was the one who said it shouldn't be the taxpayers covering the bill, but instead the members of congress should donate their OWN money to the cause?
Oh that's right, it was Paul. I don't recall anyone taking him up on the suggestion, either.
Fuck Barr. He just lost my vote.
Part of me hopes for a Paul/Nader ticket in 2012.
Nader is a little too liberal for Ron Paul, in my opinion.
Paul/Ventura 2012, Ventura/Paul 2012.
ixnay enturavay
It looks like Ron paul is giving the Republicans the same treatment they gave him, so I don't blame him for not backing McCain. Paul was actually too conservative for the Republican party.
What's wrong with Ventura?
so does this ultimately hurt McCain in the end?
To me, he comes off as just a wee bit unstable.
Not exactly someone I want to have access to the nuclear codes.
I don't consider the GOP very conservative. More like RINO.Is that why he ran to Cynthia McKinney and Ralph Nader?
They're more conservative than the GOP?