Ruth Bader Ginsburg was one of the worst justices on the Supreme Court, a polite debate...

She'll be remembered as one of the giants of the first part of the 2000's. There will be statues made of her.

I doubt any statues will be made of her but she and her work will be studied and debated for generations to come especially with future students in law and political science...
I would not be surprised if a statue of her is placed somewhere prominent by the end of the year. She was the second woman to become a justice of the supreme court. She is adored by the left. There is already a movie about her and she hated Trump. These are sure qualifications for lefties to make statues of her and scatter them across the land. Thirty years from now expect most every town that has a street named after MLK to also have a street named after RGB.
Well, shes Jewish, and she "betrayed" the left. How long before they tear it down?
How did she "betray" the left? By not resigning during the Obama Admin?
Uh....hello.....Obama could have replaced her with somebody that isn't dead now.
Well...hello.... I pointed that out with my rhetorical question. That being said, I don't see lefties hating her for dying during Trump's presidency. She will be a hero to the progressives forever.
 
She'll be remembered as one of the giants of the first part of the 2000's. There will be statues made of her.

I doubt any statues will be made of her but she and her work will be studied and debated for generations to come especially with future students in law and political science...
I would not be surprised if a statue of her is placed somewhere prominent by the end of the year. She was the second woman to become a justice of the supreme court. She is adored by the left. There is already a movie about her and she hated Trump. These are sure qualifications for lefties to make statues of her and scatter them across the land. Thirty years from now expect most every town that has a street named after MLK to also have a street named after RGB.
Well, shes Jewish, and she "betrayed" the left. How long before they tear it down?
How did she "betray" the left? By not resigning during the Obama Admin?


Yes.....had she left when he was in office the Supreme Court would still be locked down as a left wing court....Roberts is too much of a coward to do the right thing ....... but if Trump can replace her, it stops Robert from having that deciding vote......he can still screw things up because as Chief Justice he picks the cases the rest of the Justices vote on to hear....so he can just refuse to pick the cases that need to be heard.....but he won't be able to wreck things with his vote
Roberts is a Trojan Horse Bush appointee.
He was declared a conservative....but in reality....he votes with the left on every important issue.
Whatever the Globalists want....Roberts votes for.
 
She'll be remembered as one of the giants of the first part of the 2000's. There will be statues made of her.

I doubt any statues will be made of her but she and her work will be studied and debated for generations to come especially with future students in law and political science...
I would not be surprised if a statue of her is placed somewhere prominent by the end of the year. She was the second woman to become a justice of the supreme court. She is adored by the left. There is already a movie about her and she hated Trump. These are sure qualifications for lefties to make statues of her and scatter them across the land. Thirty years from now expect most every town that has a street named after MLK to also have a street named after RGB.
Well, shes Jewish, and she "betrayed" the left. How long before they tear it down?
How did she "betray" the left? By not resigning during the Obama Admin?
Uh....hello.....Obama could have replaced her with somebody that isn't dead now.
Well...hello.... I pointed that out with my rhetorical question. That being said, I don't see lefties hating her for dying during Trump's presidency. She will be a hero to the progressives forever.
Again, beyond this the nasty comments are all over twitter
 
She'll be remembered as one of the giants of the first part of the 2000's. There will be statues made of her.

I doubt any statues will be made of her but she and her work will be studied and debated for generations to come especially with future students in law and political science...
I would not be surprised if a statue of her is placed somewhere prominent by the end of the year. She was the second woman to become a justice of the supreme court. She is adored by the left. There is already a movie about her and she hated Trump. These are sure qualifications for lefties to make statues of her and scatter them across the land. Thirty years from now expect most every town that has a street named after MLK to also have a street named after RGB.
Well, shes Jewish, and she "betrayed" the left. How long before they tear it down?
How did she "betray" the left? By not resigning during the Obama Admin?
Thats what THEY are saying. It would have been the smart thing to do
But will that result in statues of her being torn down (assuming they are erected)? I don't think so.
 
Republicans need to fill RBG’s Supreme Court seat ASAP, because a full court may be required to make a ruling on disputes in the immediate aftermath of the election. Remember Bush v. Gore in 2000?
 
Republicans need to fill RBG’s Supreme Court seat ASAP, because a full court may be required to make a ruling on disputes in the immediate aftermath of the election. Remember Bush v. Gore in 2000?
Democrats are distraught....they thought Roberts would give Biden the White House.....and when RBG kicked the bucket all of that when POOF!!!!!
 
Republicans need to fill RBG’s Supreme Court seat ASAP, because a full court may be required to make a ruling on disputes in the immediate aftermath of the election. Remember Bush v. Gore in 2000?
That's why the states, like Michigan, are doing what they're doing with mail in voting. They need to move on this
 
WOW, How disgusting, no respect for the dead from this board, next time some one you love like or respect dies hope you will keep your mouth shut when some one disrespects them.
 
This columnist makes the case that Ginsburg is perhaps one of the worst Supreme Court justices...

Ginsburg used her seat on the Supreme Court as a political office and, reputedly, her dying wish was political. The politicization of her Supreme Court seat and the political fallout from her death are, therefore, appropriate topics.
------
That praise -- that she “fought” for “justice and equality” -- sums up everything that was wrong with Ginsburg for it describes a political activist, not a judge. The Supreme Court is supposed to consist of nine people who try, apolitically, to ensure that the United States is run along constitutional lines.

Ginsburg, though, had little love for the Constitution. She was quite open about that in 2012 when she offered some “helpful” advice to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as it was contemplating the Egyptian Constitution of 2012:


“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012,” Ginsburg said in an interview on Al Hayat television last Wednesday. “I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, have an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.”
The South African Constitution does not promote a small government for free people who possess inherent rights that must be free from political interference. Instead, it’s a micromanaging monstrosity that identifies “rights” (some copied from us), that are, in fact, privileges subject to the political winds.
--------

Ginsburg was also a covert eugenicist. In 2009, she confessed that she had imagined abortion as a way to get rid of undesirables:


Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. (Emphasis added.)
Since the late 19th century, when progressives have spoken about getting rid of undesirable populations, they’ve meant blacks. Of the 61 million babies aborted since Roe v. Wade, 32% have been black. Blacks make up less than 14% of the population.

Ginsburg was also an awful judge. A good Supreme Court opinion, like a solid house, is built on a constitutional foundation, with the materials coming from clear and strong precedent and law. Ginsburg’s opinions, especially when she was pushing political ends, were composed of random bits and pieces of law that could be cobbled together to make a rough shack. She and her clerks hid this shoddy construction in muddy and muddled writing surrounded by myriad case citations that were never entirely on point.


What a lie. This is what she said,her entire answer. She was describing what she thought lay behind the Medicaid decision, not a desire on her part for eugenics,

Q: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.
 
This columnist makes the case that Ginsburg is perhaps one of the worst Supreme Court justices...

Ginsburg used her seat on the Supreme Court as a political office and, reputedly, her dying wish was political. The politicization of her Supreme Court seat and the political fallout from her death are, therefore, appropriate topics.
------
That praise -- that she “fought” for “justice and equality” -- sums up everything that was wrong with Ginsburg for it describes a political activist, not a judge. The Supreme Court is supposed to consist of nine people who try, apolitically, to ensure that the United States is run along constitutional lines.

Ginsburg, though, had little love for the Constitution. She was quite open about that in 2012 when she offered some “helpful” advice to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as it was contemplating the Egyptian Constitution of 2012:


“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012,” Ginsburg said in an interview on Al Hayat television last Wednesday. “I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, have an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.”
The South African Constitution does not promote a small government for free people who possess inherent rights that must be free from political interference. Instead, it’s a micromanaging monstrosity that identifies “rights” (some copied from us), that are, in fact, privileges subject to the political winds.
--------

Ginsburg was also a covert eugenicist. In 2009, she confessed that she had imagined abortion as a way to get rid of undesirables:


Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. (Emphasis added.)
Since the late 19th century, when progressives have spoken about getting rid of undesirable populations, they’ve meant blacks. Of the 61 million babies aborted since Roe v. Wade, 32% have been black. Blacks make up less than 14% of the population.

Ginsburg was also an awful judge. A good Supreme Court opinion, like a solid house, is built on a constitutional foundation, with the materials coming from clear and strong precedent and law. Ginsburg’s opinions, especially when she was pushing political ends, were composed of random bits and pieces of law that could be cobbled together to make a rough shack. She and her clerks hid this shoddy construction in muddy and muddled writing surrounded by myriad case citations that were never entirely on point.


What a lie. This is what she said,her entire answer. She was describing what she thought lay behind the Medicaid decision, not a desire on her part for eugenics,

Q: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.

Since they pulled this out of the CDZ...weapons free everyone....


Moron.....she didn't say "Some people didn't want to have too many of...." She said "in populations that WE don't want to have too many of...."

Was that the royal We?
 
This columnist makes the case that Ginsburg is perhaps one of the worst Supreme Court justices...

Ginsburg used her seat on the Supreme Court as a political office and, reputedly, her dying wish was political. The politicization of her Supreme Court seat and the political fallout from her death are, therefore, appropriate topics.
------
That praise -- that she “fought” for “justice and equality” -- sums up everything that was wrong with Ginsburg for it describes a political activist, not a judge. The Supreme Court is supposed to consist of nine people who try, apolitically, to ensure that the United States is run along constitutional lines.

Ginsburg, though, had little love for the Constitution. She was quite open about that in 2012 when she offered some “helpful” advice to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as it was contemplating the Egyptian Constitution of 2012:


“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012,” Ginsburg said in an interview on Al Hayat television last Wednesday. “I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, have an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.”
The South African Constitution does not promote a small government for free people who possess inherent rights that must be free from political interference. Instead, it’s a micromanaging monstrosity that identifies “rights” (some copied from us), that are, in fact, privileges subject to the political winds.
--------

Ginsburg was also a covert eugenicist. In 2009, she confessed that she had imagined abortion as a way to get rid of undesirables:


Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. (Emphasis added.)
Since the late 19th century, when progressives have spoken about getting rid of undesirable populations, they’ve meant blacks. Of the 61 million babies aborted since Roe v. Wade, 32% have been black. Blacks make up less than 14% of the population.

Ginsburg was also an awful judge. A good Supreme Court opinion, like a solid house, is built on a constitutional foundation, with the materials coming from clear and strong precedent and law. Ginsburg’s opinions, especially when she was pushing political ends, were composed of random bits and pieces of law that could be cobbled together to make a rough shack. She and her clerks hid this shoddy construction in muddy and muddled writing surrounded by myriad case citations that were never entirely on point.

She was an evil fucking bitch on wheels....There is no more loathsome a scumbucket in all of humanity than a eugenicist.

I'd go piss on her grave, were it not an insult to piss.
 
Ginsberg was a genocidal racist
Ginsburghgfhgfhgffgdssdghhy.jpg

sangerhillaryposkjdfkjsdfhkasjfd.jpg
 
This columnist makes the case that Ginsburg is perhaps one of the worst Supreme Court justices...

Ginsburg used her seat on the Supreme Court as a political office and, reputedly, her dying wish was political. The politicization of her Supreme Court seat and the political fallout from her death are, therefore, appropriate topics.
------
That praise -- that she “fought” for “justice and equality” -- sums up everything that was wrong with Ginsburg for it describes a political activist, not a judge. The Supreme Court is supposed to consist of nine people who try, apolitically, to ensure that the United States is run along constitutional lines.

Ginsburg, though, had little love for the Constitution. She was quite open about that in 2012 when she offered some “helpful” advice to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as it was contemplating the Egyptian Constitution of 2012:


“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012,” Ginsburg said in an interview on Al Hayat television last Wednesday. “I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, have an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.”
The South African Constitution does not promote a small government for free people who possess inherent rights that must be free from political interference. Instead, it’s a micromanaging monstrosity that identifies “rights” (some copied from us), that are, in fact, privileges subject to the political winds.
--------

Ginsburg was also a covert eugenicist. In 2009, she confessed that she had imagined abortion as a way to get rid of undesirables:


Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. (Emphasis added.)
Since the late 19th century, when progressives have spoken about getting rid of undesirable populations, they’ve meant blacks. Of the 61 million babies aborted since Roe v. Wade, 32% have been black. Blacks make up less than 14% of the population.

Ginsburg was also an awful judge. A good Supreme Court opinion, like a solid house, is built on a constitutional foundation, with the materials coming from clear and strong precedent and law. Ginsburg’s opinions, especially when she was pushing political ends, were composed of random bits and pieces of law that could be cobbled together to make a rough shack. She and her clerks hid this shoddy construction in muddy and muddled writing surrounded by myriad case citations that were never entirely on point.


What a lie. This is what she said,her entire answer. She was describing what she thought lay behind the Medicaid decision, not a desire on her part for eugenics,

Q: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.

Since they pulled this out of the CDZ...weapons free everyone....


Moron.....she didn't say "Some people didn't want to have too many of...." She said "in populations that WE don't want to have too many of...."

Was that the royal We?

She was using a general “we” and discussing her concern that abortions might get used for that purpose. If you are going claim she supports eugenics you need more than this...but, honesty has never been your strong pointand this is a prime example of rightwing lies.
 
This columnist makes the case that Ginsburg is perhaps one of the worst Supreme Court justices...

Ginsburg used her seat on the Supreme Court as a political office and, reputedly, her dying wish was political. The politicization of her Supreme Court seat and the political fallout from her death are, therefore, appropriate topics.
------
That praise -- that she “fought” for “justice and equality” -- sums up everything that was wrong with Ginsburg for it describes a political activist, not a judge. The Supreme Court is supposed to consist of nine people who try, apolitically, to ensure that the United States is run along constitutional lines.

Ginsburg, though, had little love for the Constitution. She was quite open about that in 2012 when she offered some “helpful” advice to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as it was contemplating the Egyptian Constitution of 2012:


“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012,” Ginsburg said in an interview on Al Hayat television last Wednesday. “I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, have an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.”
The South African Constitution does not promote a small government for free people who possess inherent rights that must be free from political interference. Instead, it’s a micromanaging monstrosity that identifies “rights” (some copied from us), that are, in fact, privileges subject to the political winds.
--------

Ginsburg was also a covert eugenicist. In 2009, she confessed that she had imagined abortion as a way to get rid of undesirables:


Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. (Emphasis added.)
Since the late 19th century, when progressives have spoken about getting rid of undesirable populations, they’ve meant blacks. Of the 61 million babies aborted since Roe v. Wade, 32% have been black. Blacks make up less than 14% of the population.

Ginsburg was also an awful judge. A good Supreme Court opinion, like a solid house, is built on a constitutional foundation, with the materials coming from clear and strong precedent and law. Ginsburg’s opinions, especially when she was pushing political ends, were composed of random bits and pieces of law that could be cobbled together to make a rough shack. She and her clerks hid this shoddy construction in muddy and muddled writing surrounded by myriad case citations that were never entirely on point.

This is so on point, she was a radical political activist who hated our Constitution. It makes me sick that all of the media, including Faux News is heaping praise on her because we “must honor her”. Fuck no we don’t. She is a perfect example of how the Clintons fucked this country in the 1990’s with their insane ideology, and our country is still reeling from their horrid Agenda to destroy the fabric of our Republic.

Fuck RBG, fuck the Clintons, and fuck all Dems who worship that vapid “C”.
 
This columnist makes the case that Ginsburg is perhaps one of the worst Supreme Court justices...

Ginsburg used her seat on the Supreme Court as a political office and, reputedly, her dying wish was political. The politicization of her Supreme Court seat and the political fallout from her death are, therefore, appropriate topics.
------
That praise -- that she “fought” for “justice and equality” -- sums up everything that was wrong with Ginsburg for it describes a political activist, not a judge. The Supreme Court is supposed to consist of nine people who try, apolitically, to ensure that the United States is run along constitutional lines.

Ginsburg, though, had little love for the Constitution. She was quite open about that in 2012 when she offered some “helpful” advice to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as it was contemplating the Egyptian Constitution of 2012:


“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012,” Ginsburg said in an interview on Al Hayat television last Wednesday. “I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, have an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.”
The South African Constitution does not promote a small government for free people who possess inherent rights that must be free from political interference. Instead, it’s a micromanaging monstrosity that identifies “rights” (some copied from us), that are, in fact, privileges subject to the political winds.
--------

Ginsburg was also a covert eugenicist. In 2009, she confessed that she had imagined abortion as a way to get rid of undesirables:


Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. (Emphasis added.)
Since the late 19th century, when progressives have spoken about getting rid of undesirable populations, they’ve meant blacks. Of the 61 million babies aborted since Roe v. Wade, 32% have been black. Blacks make up less than 14% of the population.

Ginsburg was also an awful judge. A good Supreme Court opinion, like a solid house, is built on a constitutional foundation, with the materials coming from clear and strong precedent and law. Ginsburg’s opinions, especially when she was pushing political ends, were composed of random bits and pieces of law that could be cobbled together to make a rough shack. She and her clerks hid this shoddy construction in muddy and muddled writing surrounded by myriad case citations that were never entirely on point.

This is so on point, she was a radical political activist who hated our Constitution. It makes me sick that all of the media, including Faux News is heaping praise on her because we “must honor her”. Fuck no we don’t. She is a perfect example of how the Clintons fucked this country in the 1990’s with their insane ideology, and our country is still reeling from their horrid Agenda to destroy the fabric of our Republic.

Fuck RBG, fuck the Clintons, and fuck all Dems who worship that vapid “C”.
Had no idea you hated the idea of equality for women so much.
 

Forum List

Back
Top