BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 94,203
- 30,492
- 2,250
I don't care if you want to spend the rest of your life thinking you solved the world's energy problem, but nobody cares. You have had it explained to you multiple times. It's up to you whether you accept reality or not. I suggest you calculate the continuous volume and pressure you would require to fill those buckets, and then go to an industrial rental company to see if they have a compressor to supply that volume at that pressure. Take note of the horsepower required to run that compressor, and compare it to the calculated output of your device.Honestly, I am willing to accept that I am wrong. In fact, I believe there is a 95% chance that I am wrong. But that 5% keeps me up a night and I really want a god nights sleet. All that needs to be done is for someone to point out what aspect or what design flaws there are that proves it will not work. As of yet; no one has done that.You went off track when you refused to accept the possibility that you are wrong. Possibly before then, but for sure by that time.
I get a lot of, “it is a perpetual motion machine therefore it cannot work.” That response falls short of pointing what technical aspect that is wrong.
The design principles are simple enough. Just point out the flaw & if it is a sound described flaw I will end this merry-go-round and move on to something else.
OK?