i chastize him because i am also getting tired of the brand of "liberalism" that obama and his supporters such as that are pushing. It's not liberalism, or not the type i support anyway.
and i did notice that. And notice i'm not linking the birthers to you or any of the crazy types. And i didn't link brown with anyone, the hadek guy did by coming out and saying he had brown's endorsement.
first of all, i am a she. I don't know what "brand" of liberalism you are supporting. Why don't you define it??
first of all, it doesn't show and no one cares about your sex, anyway. I'd imagine after you've been taking the thorazine for a while, it won't make any difference.
I'd say dogbert supports the brand of liberalism where one is just misguided and perhaps a bit stupid, as opposed to the one where you are barking, drooling nuts, wraparound jacket and all.
i like the fact that obama never made the election about race. That wasn't true of everybody. And anybody that says the racists did not come out like rats are just not telling the truth. Some people just could not accept a black prez and that's that. So let me chastize you. I'm sick of people acting like it's not true. Did you see some of the signs at these stupid tea bag gatherings??? All of the terrible emails that went out during the campaign??
If your kind of liberalism does not acknowledge what all of this means, then you can keep it.
if you weren't a racist - as well as being a driveling lunatic - you wouldn't be so hung up on the president's skin color and might actually spare some attention to important matters, like policy decisions.