SCotUS hears case on "ghost guns"

[Fort Fun Indiana]

A competent machinist can make this stuff in a day. What can the Supreme Court do about it?

Nothing. What a bizarre and stupid question. The Supreme Court hears cases.

He should be thrown in jail. Like someone who makes a bomb at home.

 

[ThisIsMe]

lol…ghost guns..and so close to Halloween…that’s called ironic

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Irrelevant to the law.

According to you.

Not according to 5 of the 9 justices, the last time they heard a case about it.

Do you think they know the law?

 

[M14 Shooter]

He should be thrown in jail. Like someone who makes a bomb at home.

It is perfectly legal under federal law for someone to build an unserialized gun.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It is perfectly legal under federal law for someone to build an unserialized gun.

A lot of things are legal, that become illegal outside your private property.

This should be no different.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Except for all of the facts available.

The facts you cite are a list of possibilities from an opinion piece.
Your citation:
"...could vote to uphold..."

My statement stands.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The facts you cite are a list of possibilities from an opinion piece.

No.

The facts are their prior ruling and their comments during the oral arguments phase of this case.

Literally the entire basis of the article.

Those facts can be used to guess at a likely outcome.

Which I did.

 

[M14 Shooter]

A lot of things are legal, that become illegal outside your private property.
This should be no different.

Talk to you congressman - because under federal law, its legal.
And you can do anything with an unserialized gun you made yourself that to can do with a gun you brought from Cabella's

 

[daveman]

A lot of things are legal, that become illegal outside your private property.

This should be no different.

So you're okay with someone building these guns if it never leaves his property? What if he uses it against home invaders?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Talk to you congressman - because under federal law, its legal.

Well no shit, else this topic wouldn't exist.

I think we all are up to speed on that, my guy.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Not according to 5 of the 9 justices, the last time they heard a case about it.

Cite the case.
Copy / paste the text of the ruling to that effect.

 

[whitehall]

Nothing. What a bizarre and stupid question. The Supreme Court hears cases.

He should be thrown in jail. Like someone who makes a bomb at home.

That's my point.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Behold, a firearm!

I bet that thing kicks like a mule.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Well no shit, else this topic wouldn't exist.
I think we all are up to speed on that, my guy.

So... when do you start your campaign to change the law?

 

[daveman]

Nothing. What a bizarre and stupid question. The Supreme Court hears cases.

He should be thrown in jail. Like someone who makes a bomb at home.

Why? Until he uses said bomb to hurt people and destroy property that isn't his, what crime has been committed?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Right now is a good time to note a related point.

One of the favorite "door slamming" arguments of the gun enthusiast crowd is to say, "We should just enforce the laws we have!"

Then they turn around and proceed to throw everything they have behind gettings those laws deleted.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Cite the case.
Copy / paste the text of the ruling to that effect.

The article i posted discusses it.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The article i posted discusses it.

Wait.... There was a vote on the case?
Missed that.
Please cite the ruling.
What was the vote?
Who wrote the opinion? The dissent?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Wait.... There was a vote on the case?
Missed that.
Please cite the ruling.
What was the vote?
Who wrote the opinion? The dissent?

It's in the article.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The Supreme Court split 5-4 last year when it temporarily approved the Biden administration’s regulation of so-called ghost guns pending a final resolution of the litigation.
......

Literally the first sentence.