SCOTUS is making clear where it falls on the Second Amendment

[JakeStarkey]

Supreme Court won't hear a California gun case, leaving in place the state's strict limits on concealed weapons

Last year SCOTUS refused to hear an appeal on CA's very strict concealed carry law. The 9th stated no required protection of CCW under the 2dA exists. Perulta v San Diego: SCOTUS refused to hear the appeal 7-1; only Gorsuch and Thomas wanted to review the case. the Supreme Court rejected an appeal of California's strict concealed-carry law. And the court apparently does not want to hear appeals involving appeal of rulings banning assault-weapons.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The Court won't hear any of these cases until there's disagreement between or among the appeals courts.

 

[BluesLegend]

The 2nd says nothing about carrying concealed. Now if they ban both open carry and concealed, effectively stripping people of their 2nd amendment rights outside their home then maybe there's a case.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Supreme Court won't hear a California gun case, leaving in place the state's strict limits on concealed weapons

Last year SCOTUS refused to hear an appeal on CA's very strict concealed carry law. The 9th stated no required protection of CCW under the 2dA exists. Perulta v San Diego: SCOTUS refused to hear the appeal 7-1; only Gorsuch and Thomas wanted to review the case. the Supreme Court rejected an appeal of California's strict concealed-carry law. And the court apparently does not want to hear appeals involving appeal of rulings banning assault-weapons.

That is neither a comment on the validity of the 9th Circus ruling nor a rejection of it.

See Post #2 for the correct answer.

 

[Some Guy]

Nice to see the federal government decline to trample on state's rights for once.

 

[dcbl]

Sad to hear this, but we have plenty of good rulings on the way

Little Scalia doing work

And this is why I voted for and supported Trump

 

[JakeStarkey]

Supreme Court won't hear a California gun case, leaving in place the state's strict limits on concealed weapons

Last year SCOTUS refused to hear an appeal on CA's very strict concealed carry law. The 9th stated no required protection of CCW under the 2dA exists. Perulta v San Diego: SCOTUS refused to hear the appeal 7-1; only Gorsuch and Thomas wanted to review the case. the Supreme Court rejected an appeal of California's strict concealed-carry law. And the court apparently does not want to hear appeals involving appeal of rulings banning assault-weapons.

That is neither a comment on the validity of the 9th Circus ruling nor a rejection of it. See Post #2 for the correct answer.

My point is the correct answer. Thank you for that. The states may rule on 2dA affairs under the purview of SCOTUS.