Should Biden to Put Liz Cheney and Nancy Pelosi Above the Rule of Law, by Pardoning for Any And All Alleged Crimes?

Should Biden Pardon Liz Cheney and Adam Kinziger Before Charges Are Heard?


  • Total voters
    6
  • Poll closed .

munkle

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2012
5,196
8,907
2,130
See where this leads. Pardons were intended for controversial cases at law. Not "Royalty." Trump didn't pardon Roger Stone, Bannon, Navarro, because he is the one who believes in the rule of law. Not the PedophileCrats.


"That’s why preemptive pardons are necessary. Before he leaves office, Biden should pardon Liz Cheney, a profile in courage who we haven’t heard from since the election, and Nancy Pelosi, another unafraid leader and favorite target of Trump."

LOL Liz Cheney "profile in courage?" She is the daughter of Treason. Her father Dick Cheny was in the control room PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center) when the plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11. He had the chance to shoot it down before it hit. But he didn't.


US Transportaion Secretary Norman Mineta tells the world that Dick Cheney could have saved the Pentagon on 9/11.





Vice President Dick Cheney was in the White House during the attack. He said he learned of the attack from a clerical secretary.

Interestingly, Cheney, in an interview with Tim Russert on NBC, indicated that the President made the decision that day to scramble fighter jets. This is very unusual, as it is contrary to standard operating procedures, and raises the question of whether and why the President delayed the scrambling of jets. Here is the text of Vice President Cheney's comments on NBC: 1

Tim Russert: "What's the most important decision you think he (President Bush) made during the course of the day?"
VP Cheney: "Well, the, I suppose the toughest decision was this question of whether or not we would intercept incoming commercial aircraft ... We decided to do it."
Here Cheney cleverly attempts to confuse the listener into thinking that "intercept" means "shoot down". In fact the routine procedure of interception consists of flying fighter jets to within close proximity to the off-course aircraft, and attempting to make visual contact with whoever is in the cockpit.

As the attack unfolded, news reports stated that Cheney had been whisked to a secret and secure location -- later revealed to be the Presidential Emergency Operating Center in the basement of the White House. Cheney was with National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, directing the response to the attack. Or was he directing the attack? The testimony of Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta is suggestive in this regard.

MR. HAMILTON: We thank you for that. I wanted to focus just a moment on the Presidential Emergency Operating Center. You were there for a good part of the day. I think you were there with the vice president. And when you had that order given, I think it was by the president, that authorized the shooting down of commercial aircraft that were suspected to be controlled by terrorists, were you there when that order was given?

MR. MINETA: No, I was not. I was made aware of it during the time that the airplane coming into the Pentagon. There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?" 2

Hamilton indicates that "the orders" were to shoot down commercial aircraft. But Mineta's account makes more sense if "the orders" were not to shoot down any such aircraft. The repeated questioning of Cheney by the junior officer whether "the orders still stand" had to be about whether the order NOT to destroy them still stood. Given the two prior attacks against the Twin Towers using the commercial airliners as weapons, an order to destroy the plane approaching the Pentagon would be the only order to give and would not be subject to question by a junior officer as the plane approached. Furthermore, had Cheney's order been to fire on the plane approaching the Pentagon (which first came near the White House), the anti-missile anti-aircraft capacity of the Pentagon (or White House), would have sufficed to take out that plane, and certainly to have attempted to take out that plane. Neither occurred, and since Mineta does not speak of a last-second change by Cheney, the only supportable conclusion is that Cheney's order was NOT to defend the Pentagon, an order so contrary to both common sense and military defense that it, and it alone, explains the repeated questioning by the junior officer. 3


References

1. The Vice President appears on Meet the Press with Tim Russert, Whitehouse.gov, 9/16/01 [cached]
2. Public Hearing; Panel 1: September 11, 2001: The Attacks and the Response, 9-11commission.gov, 5/23/03 [cached]
3. How They Get Away With It, 9-11 Research,
 
Last edited:
Given Trump's blatant disregard for the rule of law, Biden should pardon everyone who served in his administration.

How exactly did he disregard the rule of law? With the alleged "insurrection" in which the prime Fed instigator now dubbed "Scaffold Commander" wasn't even touched by the FBI, and still hasn't been? Even though he yelled from a bullhorn from the media tower for an hour "We got to GO INSIDE THE CAPITOL!" Yet he is STILL not even on the FBI Most Wanted List?



1733193538332.png



MORE INFO

 
See where this leads. Pardons were intended for controversial cases at law. Not "Royalty." Trump didn't pardon Roger Stone, Bannon, Navarro, because he is the one who believes in the rule of law. Not the PedophileCrats.


"That’s why preemptive pardons are necessary. Before he leaves office, Biden should pardon Liz Cheney, a profile in courage who we haven’t heard from since the election, and Nancy Pelosi, another unafraid leader and favorite target of Trump."

LOL Liz Cheney "profile in courage?" She is the daughter of Treason. Her father Dick Cheny was in the control room PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center) when the plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11. He had the chance to shoot it down before it hit. But he didn't.


US Transportaion Secretary Norman Mineta tells the world that Dick Cheney could have saved the Pentagon on 9/11.





Vice President Dick Cheney was in the White House during the attack. He said he learned of the attack from a clerical secretary.

Interestingly, Cheney, in an interview with Tim Russert on NBC, indicated that the President made the decision that day to scramble fighter jets. This is very unusual, as it is contrary to standard operating procedures, and raises the question of whether and why the President delayed the scrambling of jets. Here is the text of Vice President Cheney's comments on NBC: 1

Tim Russert: "What's the most important decision you think he (President Bush) made during the course of the day?"
VP Cheney: "Well, the, I suppose the toughest decision was this question of whether or not we would intercept incoming commercial aircraft ... We decided to do it."
Here Cheney cleverly attempts to confuse the listener into thinking that "intercept" means "shoot down". In fact the routine procedure of interception consists of flying fighter jets to within close proximity to the off-course aircraft, and attempting to make visual contact with whoever is in the cockpit.

As the attack unfolded, news reports stated that Cheney had been whisked to a secret and secure location -- later revealed to be the Presidential Emergency Operating Center in the basement of the White House. Cheney was with National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, directing the response to the attack. Or was he directing the attack? The testimony of Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta is suggestive in this regard.

MR. HAMILTON: We thank you for that. I wanted to focus just a moment on the Presidential Emergency Operating Center. You were there for a good part of the day. I think you were there with the vice president. And when you had that order given, I think it was by the president, that authorized the shooting down of commercial aircraft that were suspected to be controlled by terrorists, were you there when that order was given?

MR. MINETA: No, I was not. I was made aware of it during the time that the airplane coming into the Pentagon. There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?" 2

Hamilton indicates that "the orders" were to shoot down commercial aircraft. But Mineta's account makes more sense if "the orders" were not to shoot down any such aircraft. The repeated questioning of Cheney by the junior officer whether "the orders still stand" had to be about whether the order NOT to destroy them still stood. Given the two prior attacks against the Twin Towers using the commercial airliners as weapons, an order to destroy the plane approaching the Pentagon would be the only order to give and would not be subject to question by a junior officer as the plane approached. Furthermore, had Cheney's order been to fire on the plane approaching the Pentagon (which first came near the White House), the anti-missile anti-aircraft capacity of the Pentagon (or White House), would have sufficed to take out that plane, and certainly to have attempted to take out that plane. Neither occurred, and since Mineta does not speak of a last-second change by Cheney, the only supportable conclusion is that Cheney's order was NOT to defend the Pentagon, an order so contrary to both common sense and military defense that it, and it alone, explains the repeated questioning by the junior officer. 3


References

1. The Vice President appears on Meet the Press with Tim Russert, Whitehouse.gov, 9/16/01 [cached]
2. Public Hearing; Panel 1: September 11, 2001: The Attacks and the Response, 9-11commission.gov, 5/23/03 [cached]
3. How They Get Away With It, 9-11 Research,

What "crimes"?
 
Actually, it isn't Liz Cheney that needs a pardon, its her father who may be facing war crimes charges in The Hague.

Unfortunatlely, no President has the authority to pardon those types of offenses.
 
Yes
He well may identify the top 15 who harmed Trump and we would jail
By pardoning in advance he fully identifies them as criminal
 
I bet the white house phones are on fire with corrupt dems asking... no begging for pardons...
 
See where this leads. Pardons were intended for controversial cases at law. Not "Royalty." Trump didn't pardon Roger Stone, Bannon, Navarro, because he is the one who believes in the rule of law. Not the PedophileCrats.

I can't believe democrats what HYPOCRITES they are. After all their yammering about the Supreme Court giving Trump immunity for his four years (which they didn't, they just affirmed that you can't prosecute a standing president, any president, for presidential actions of the office while they are in office), here comes along blubber-ass Biden who gives his son a BLANKET immunity, for a DECADE, a known criminal, so that he is SCOTT FREE for ANYTHING he did for an entire DECADE.

But predictably, you don't hear them saying a single word about it now. And we all know the only reason Hunter got this pardon was because Biden knew his son was a criminal and NEEDED all the legal protection he could give his son. Just imagine if Trump had done that for Eric or Don Jr.?

Oh yeah--- Eric nor Don Jr. were not snorting crack and carrying a gun while banging children taking video of them.
 
See where this leads. Pardons were intended for controversial cases at law. Not "Royalty." Trump didn't pardon Roger Stone, Bannon, Navarro, because he is the one who believes in the rule of law. Not the PedophileCrats.


"That’s why preemptive pardons are necessary. Before he leaves office, Biden should pardon Liz Cheney, a profile in courage who we haven’t heard from since the election, and Nancy Pelosi, another unafraid leader and favorite target of Trump."

LOL Liz Cheney "profile in courage?" She is the daughter of Treason. Her father Dick Cheny was in the control room PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center) when the plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11. He had the chance to shoot it down before it hit. But he didn't.


US Transportaion Secretary Norman Mineta tells the world that Dick Cheney could have saved the Pentagon on 9/11.





Vice President Dick Cheney was in the White House during the attack. He said he learned of the attack from a clerical secretary.

Interestingly, Cheney, in an interview with Tim Russert on NBC, indicated that the President made the decision that day to scramble fighter jets. This is very unusual, as it is contrary to standard operating procedures, and raises the question of whether and why the President delayed the scrambling of jets. Here is the text of Vice President Cheney's comments on NBC: 1

Tim Russert: "What's the most important decision you think he (President Bush) made during the course of the day?"
VP Cheney: "Well, the, I suppose the toughest decision was this question of whether or not we would intercept incoming commercial aircraft ... We decided to do it."
Here Cheney cleverly attempts to confuse the listener into thinking that "intercept" means "shoot down". In fact the routine procedure of interception consists of flying fighter jets to within close proximity to the off-course aircraft, and attempting to make visual contact with whoever is in the cockpit.

As the attack unfolded, news reports stated that Cheney had been whisked to a secret and secure location -- later revealed to be the Presidential Emergency Operating Center in the basement of the White House. Cheney was with National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, directing the response to the attack. Or was he directing the attack? The testimony of Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta is suggestive in this regard.

MR. HAMILTON: We thank you for that. I wanted to focus just a moment on the Presidential Emergency Operating Center. You were there for a good part of the day. I think you were there with the vice president. And when you had that order given, I think it was by the president, that authorized the shooting down of commercial aircraft that were suspected to be controlled by terrorists, were you there when that order was given?

MR. MINETA: No, I was not. I was made aware of it during the time that the airplane coming into the Pentagon. There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?" 2

Hamilton indicates that "the orders" were to shoot down commercial aircraft. But Mineta's account makes more sense if "the orders" were not to shoot down any such aircraft. The repeated questioning of Cheney by the junior officer whether "the orders still stand" had to be about whether the order NOT to destroy them still stood. Given the two prior attacks against the Twin Towers using the commercial airliners as weapons, an order to destroy the plane approaching the Pentagon would be the only order to give and would not be subject to question by a junior officer as the plane approached. Furthermore, had Cheney's order been to fire on the plane approaching the Pentagon (which first came near the White House), the anti-missile anti-aircraft capacity of the Pentagon (or White House), would have sufficed to take out that plane, and certainly to have attempted to take out that plane. Neither occurred, and since Mineta does not speak of a last-second change by Cheney, the only supportable conclusion is that Cheney's order was NOT to defend the Pentagon, an order so contrary to both common sense and military defense that it, and it alone, explains the repeated questioning by the junior officer. 3


References

1. The Vice President appears on Meet the Press with Tim Russert, Whitehouse.gov, 9/16/01 [cached]
2. Public Hearing; Panel 1: September 11, 2001: The Attacks and the Response, 9-11commission.gov, 5/23/03 [cached]
3. How They Get Away With It, 9-11 Research,

Pardoning someone who has not been charged with anything, the legal effect has never been considered by the Supreme Court. So even if the likes of Pelosi gets a pardon, the incoming administration could take it to the supreme court to try and nullify it. Imo, a pardon is to pardon a conviction as opposed anything that may possibly crop up.
 
How exactly did he disregard the rule of law? With the alleged "insurrection" in which the prime Fed instigator now dubbed "Scaffold Commander" wasn't even touched by the FBI, and still hasn't been? Even though he yelled from a bullhorn from the media tower for an hour "We got to GO INSIDE THE CAPITOL!" Yet he is STILL not even on the FBI Most Wanted List?

Nobody came to Washington or stormed the Capitol because some loudmouth on a scaffold told them to. They did it because Trump told them to.
 
Pardoning someone who has not been charged with anything, the legal effect has never been considered by the Supreme Court. So even if the likes of Pelosi gets a pardon, the incoming administration could take it to the supreme court to try and nullify it. Imo, a pardon is to pardon a conviction as opposed anything that may possibly crop up.

Except this was already lititgated with Nixon's pardon by Jerry Ford.
 

Forum List

Back
Top