Supreme Court Denies Trumps Delay In Sentencing On Friday
- Thread starter skews13
- Start date
meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 23,490
- 20,497
- 2,290
Appeals court rejects Trump's challenge of sexual abuse verdict in E. Jean Carroll case
The court roundly rejected claims by Trump that the judge who presided over the trial erred in a series of decisions.
www.cbsnews.com
Appeals court rejects Trump's challenge of sexual abuse verdict in E. Jean Carroll case
President-elect Donald Trump is not entitled to a new trial in the case in which a jury found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation of the writer E. Jean Carroll, a federal appeals court ruled Monday.
The court roundly rejected claims by Trump and his lawyers that the judge who presided over the trial made a series of decisions that harmed Trump's standing with the jury.
Monday's 77-page decision rejected complaints made repeatedly by Trump before, during and after the nine-day trial.
P.S. That means all of Trumps motions were B.S.
para bellum
Diamond Member
Manhattan prosecutor gets Trump tax records after long fight
NEW YORK (AP) — A New York prosecutor has obtained copies of Donald Trump’s tax records after the Supreme Court this week rejected the former president’s last-ditch effort to prevent them from being handed over.apnews.com
Manhattan prosecutor gets Trump tax records after long fight
February 25, 2021
A New York prosecutor has obtained copies of Donald Trump’s tax records after the Supreme Court this week rejected the former president’s last-ditch effort to prevent them from being handed over.
The Manhattan district attorney’s office enforced a subpoena on Trump’s accounting firm within hours of the Supreme Court’s ruling on Monday and now has the documents in hand, a spokesperson for the office, Danny Frost, said Thursday.
Irrelevant.
You can flail and wail all you want, it does not change the facts.
Trump was not accused of any tax fraud related to the Cohen payments, the evidence in Bragg's case was all from 2018 or earlier, and Weisselberg's plea deal was over executive compensation and had nothing to do with the payments to Cohen.
Trump was guilty of hiring a sheister lawyer who advanced an extortion scheme against him. A serial perjurer who even admitted to stealing from him in court. That's your champion.
Last edited:
para bellum
Diamond Member
More case conflation from you, do you ever tire of it?Appeals court rejects Trump's challenge of sexual abuse verdict in E. Jean Carroll case
The court roundly rejected claims by Trump that the judge who presided over the trial erred in a series of decisions.
Appeals court rejects Trump's challenge of sexual abuse verdict in E. Jean Carroll case
President-elect Donald Trump is not entitled to a new trial in the case in which a jury found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation of the writer E. Jean Carroll, a federal appeals court ruled Monday.
The court roundly rejected claims by Trump and his lawyers that the judge who presided over the trial made a series of decisions that harmed Trump's standing with the jury.
Monday's 77-page decision rejected complaints made repeatedly by Trump before, during and after the nine-day trial.
P.S. That means all of Trumps motions were B.S.
This thread is about Bragg's case, not any of the multitude of lawfare cases that dems brought in the failed attempt to prevent his reelection.
Yes, he filed lots of motions in all those cases, and exercised his rights to appeal when possible. But they are separate cases. Each one was filed on it's own merits, and it is a defendant's right to due process whether you like it or not.
The fact that he was forced to defend against 6 or 7 cases simultaneously is only further proof that this is lawfare, not about justice.
Dems pulled out all the stops in the effort to get Trump, and have done irreparable harm to the reputation of the rule of law in the process. You have really fucked it up. Very bad for the country.
- Apr 11, 2023
- 38,488
- 19,122
- 1,788
The felon was awarded due process.
meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 23,490
- 20,497
- 2,290
The Manhattan DA's office then issued a subpoena for the Trump Organization in August, seeking documents relating to the payments.[27] Additionally, the office subpoenaed accounting firm Mazars USA, demanding eight years of Trump's corporate tax returns.[28] Trump's lawyers sued Vance to block the subpoena, citing Trump's immunity from criminal inquiries as the president of the United States.[29] In Trump v. Vance, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7–2 in favor of Vance, allowing the subpoena to continue
In later filings, Bragg listed (but still did not charge) three general types of crime that Trump allegedly intended to commit: violation of federal campaign finance limits, violation of state election laws by unlawfully influencing the 2016 election, and violation of state tax laws regarding the reimbursement
para bellum
Diamond Member
Yeah, so what? Vance got Trump's tax returns in 2021. Vance didn't charge Trump with anything and closed his investigation.
Bragg took over the office and resurrected the witch hunt. Bragg DID NOT use any of the tax records that Vance had secured in 2021 in his case against Trump.
You can be sure that they went over those tax returns with a fine-tooth comb looking for anything they could use. But they found NOTHING.
Bragg indicted Trump in April 2023. The ENTIRE case was based on records from 2018 and earlier.
Bragg could have brought that case against Trump in 2021. Every piece of evidence used was already 3 years old at that time.
FAIL.
Last edited:
Bored huh? I'm sorry the board has disappointed you once again.
meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 23,490
- 20,497
- 2,290
What you keep ignoring is the process.
The business records were false, but standing on their own, there is no way of knowing that. They were false because of being put under a business deduction, instead of a personal expense.
They could only subpoena Trump's business records for just cause, and not for a fishing expedition, which means they had to have some proof that the business records were illegally legered.
A district attorney (DA) or other prosecutor can issue a subpoena in New York State to compel a witness to appear in court or to produce documents. To get a subpoena, a DA needs to apply for it and have it signed by a judge.
That evidence came from Trump's tax returns.
para bellum
Diamond Member
Bullshit. They already had the records, they used them against Cohen in 2018. Read the Cohen indictment.
Every invoice, every check from Trump including the amounts, the "grossing up" for tax purposes, the 60K bonus, the communications between Cohen and Weisselberg (referred to as executive-1). It is all in the Cohen indictment. It is the section entitled "Campaign Finance Violations", beginning at page 11.
None of that detail is reflected in any tax record, and no such tax records were ever entered into evidence. The payments were listed as "legal expenses" because that is the standard bookkeeping notation that everyone uses. The recording of the payments as "legal expenses" was also cited in the Cohen indictment, so they knew that in 2018 as well.
It is not a falsification of anything, and definitely not something that would be discovered by studying tax returns. The payments were never shown to be used as tax deductions, and would not be listed individually on any tax return anyway.
They were also never part of an actual Trump business record. They were always from Trump's personal finances. Merchan simply designated Trump (the person) as a "business" for the purposes of the statute.
The Cohen indictment PROVES that they had all that material back in 2018.
Bragg simply repackaged the charges against Cohen into the indictment against Trump.
Your claim that they only learned all that from Trump's taxes is a figment of your own imagination, and unsupported by any case record or exhibit. That is known as "grasping at straws". It also shows that you have never filed a business tax return in your life, because bookkeeping reports are NEVER part of any tax return. The IRS has their own forms for everything, and accept ONLY their forms in tax filings.
Last edited:
- Jul 1, 2024
- 11,046
- 4,209
- 188
It's the mindless automatic Trump defense attitude that bores me, no substance, just a robotic repetition of lies.
- Apr 11, 2023
- 38,488
- 19,122
- 1,788
Robotic mindless Trump defender syndrome.
meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 23,490
- 20,497
- 2,290
And the unexplained part is they think they have better arguments than Trumps billionaire funded legal teams.
C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
You voted for a sex offender, criminal, and convicted felon – the filth belongs solely to Trump voters.
Yeah, but he didn't double your food & gas prices...nor did he burn all of california to ashes. DEMOCRAT FILTH did that!
- Apr 11, 2023
- 38,488
- 19,122
- 1,788
He created the conditions for the inflation. Biden did not. California has nothing to do with this. He is a convicted felon, and sexual offender, and a narcissistic monster only out for himself.
Biden printed TRILLIONS from the "Inflation reduction act" which caused the inflation. Ya fuckin' Yutz!
- Apr 11, 2023
- 38,488
- 19,122
- 1,788
Nope, lie all you want, but it was Trump's dislocation of world markets because of Covid.
Keep drinking the democrat kool-aid!
Similar threads
New Topics
-
trump has put the US on the moral equivalent with Russia, defending Putin- Started by JimH52
- Replies: 3
-
We were lied to about Vietnam, We were lied to about Iraq, We were lied to about Afghanistan...- Started by tyroneweaver
- Replies: 3
-
-
-
EU countries are plotting a dangerous game of starting a third world war- Started by BlackWizard91
- Replies: 3
