Supreme Court Denies Trumps Delay In Sentencing On Friday

[WEATHER53]

Just like a word is not a sentence, there is no such thing as a sentence when no sentence is conveyed
Smearing monkeyshines is all it was

 

[meaner gene]

That is not true. Motions have to be filed to preserve the appeal, as I already stated.

The only motions that are subject to interlocutory appeal are motions that will result in irreparable harm if they are wrongfully denied.

There may have been one motion in the course of the case that was appealable, that would have been a motion to dismiss. The rest have to be dealt with on appeal.

You are conflating cases, I think...

Appeals court rejects Trump's challenge of sexual abuse verdict in E. Jean Carroll case

The court roundly rejected claims by Trump that the judge who presided over the trial erred in a series of decisions.

www.cbsnews.com

Appeals court rejects Trump's challenge of sexual abuse verdict in E. Jean Carroll case

President-elect Donald Trump is not entitled to a new trial in the case in which a jury found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation of the writer E. Jean Carroll, a federal appeals court ruled Monday.

The court roundly rejected claims by Trump and his lawyers that the judge who presided over the trial made a series of decisions that harmed Trump's standing with the jury.

Monday's 77-page decision rejected complaints made repeatedly by Trump before, during and after the nine-day trial.

P.S. That means all of Trumps motions were B.S.

 

[para bellum]

Manhattan prosecutor gets Trump tax records after long fight

NEW YORK (AP) — A New York prosecutor has obtained copies of Donald Trump’s tax records after the Supreme Court this week rejected the former president’s last-ditch effort to prevent them from being handed over.

apnews.com

Manhattan prosecutor gets Trump tax records after long fight
February 25, 2021

A New York prosecutor has obtained copies of Donald Trump’s tax records after the Supreme Court this week rejected the former president’s last-ditch effort to prevent them from being handed over.

The Manhattan district attorney’s office enforced a subpoena on Trump’s accounting firm within hours of the Supreme Court’s ruling on Monday and now has the documents in hand, a spokesperson for the office, Danny Frost, said Thursday.

“For more than three years, Weisselberg has delayed the system with multiple motions to dismiss, delayed hearings and depositions,” Cohen said. “Time caught up to him and when it did, he did the only thing could ... take a plea deal.”

Irrelevant.

You can flail and wail all you want, it does not change the facts.

Trump was not accused of any tax fraud related to the Cohen payments, the evidence in Bragg's case was all from 2018 or earlier, and Weisselberg's plea deal was over executive compensation and had nothing to do with the payments to Cohen.

Trump was guilty of hiring a sheister lawyer who advanced an extortion scheme against him. A serial perjurer who even admitted to stealing from him in court. That's your champion.

 

[para bellum]

Appeals court rejects Trump's challenge of sexual abuse verdict in E. Jean Carroll case

The court roundly rejected claims by Trump that the judge who presided over the trial erred in a series of decisions.

www.cbsnews.com

Appeals court rejects Trump's challenge of sexual abuse verdict in E. Jean Carroll case

President-elect Donald Trump is not entitled to a new trial in the case in which a jury found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation of the writer E. Jean Carroll, a federal appeals court ruled Monday.

The court roundly rejected claims by Trump and his lawyers that the judge who presided over the trial made a series of decisions that harmed Trump's standing with the jury.

Monday's 77-page decision rejected complaints made repeatedly by Trump before, during and after the nine-day trial.

P.S. That means all of Trumps motions were B.S.

More case conflation from you, do you ever tire of it?

This thread is about Bragg's case, not any of the multitude of lawfare cases that dems brought in the failed attempt to prevent his reelection.

Yes, he filed lots of motions in all those cases, and exercised his rights to appeal when possible. But they are separate cases. Each one was filed on it's own merits, and it is a defendant's right to due process whether you like it or not.

The fact that he was forced to defend against 6 or 7 cases simultaneously is only further proof that this is lawfare, not about justice.

Dems pulled out all the stops in the effort to get Trump, and have done irreparable harm to the reputation of the rule of law in the process. You have really fucked it up. Very bad for the country.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The persecution was already done. Sentencing would have still happened if Trump lost the appeal.

The motion was a motion to vacate, and those are subject to interlocutory appeal because they have a material impact on the outcome in the case. Improper denials cannot be undone.

Due Process was denied to Trump by the SCOTUS.

Trump may well have lost the appeal, we will never know because he was not afforded the chance to argue it.

The felon was awarded due process.

 

[meaner gene]

Irrelevant.

You can flail and wail all you want, it does not change the facts.

Trump was not accused of any tax fraud related to the Cohen payments, the evidence in Bragg's case was all from 2018 or earlier, and Weisselberg's plea deal was over executive compensation and had nothing to do with the payments to Cohen.

Trump was guilty of hiring a sheister lawyer who advanced an extortion scheme against him. A serial perjurer who even admitted to stealing from him in court. That's your champion.

The Manhattan DA's office then issued a subpoena for the Trump Organization in August, seeking documents relating to the payments.[27] Additionally, the office subpoenaed accounting firm Mazars USA, demanding eight years of Trump's corporate tax returns.[28] Trump's lawyers sued Vance to block the subpoena, citing Trump's immunity from criminal inquiries as the president of the United States.[29] In Trump v. Vance, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7–2 in favor of Vance, allowing the subpoena to continue

In later filings, Bragg listed (but still did not charge) three general types of crime that Trump allegedly intended to commit: violation of federal campaign finance limits, violation of state election laws by unlawfully influencing the 2016 election, and violation of state tax laws regarding the reimbursement

 

[sparky]

One can feel the TDS building towards the 20th here ~S~

 

[para bellum]

The Manhattan DA's office then issued a subpoena for the Trump Organization in August, seeking documents relating to the payments.[27] Additionally, the office subpoenaed accounting firm Mazars USA, demanding eight years of Trump's corporate tax returns.[28] Trump's lawyers sued Vance to block the subpoena, citing Trump's immunity from criminal inquiries as the president of the United States.[29] In Trump v. Vance, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7–2 in favor of Vance, allowing the subpoena to continue

In later filings, Bragg listed (but still did not charge) three general types of crime that Trump allegedly intended to commit: violation of federal campaign finance limits, violation of state election laws by unlawfully influencing the 2016 election, and violation of state tax laws regarding the reimbursement

Yeah, so what? Vance got Trump's tax returns in 2021. Vance didn't charge Trump with anything and closed his investigation.

Bragg took over the office and resurrected the witch hunt. Bragg DID NOT use any of the tax records that Vance had secured in 2021 in his case against Trump.

You can be sure that they went over those tax returns with a fine-tooth comb looking for anything they could use. But they found NOTHING.

Bragg indicted Trump in April 2023. The ENTIRE case was based on records from 2018 and earlier.

Bragg could have brought that case against Trump in 2021. Every piece of evidence used was already 3 years old at that time.

FAIL.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Not at all. I posted the statement as a parting statement, I was bored with the thread and had didn't see any point on continued discussion, that was me just summarizing my view.

Bored huh? I'm sorry the board has disappointed you once again.

 

[meaner gene]

Yeah, so what? Vance got Trump's tax returns in 2021. Vance didn't charge Trump with anything and closed his investigation.

Bragg took over the office and resurrected the witch hunt. Bragg DID NOT use any of the tax records that Vance had secured in 2021 in his case against Trump.

You can be sure that they went over those tax returns with a fine-tooth comb looking for anything they could use. But they found NOTHING.

Bragg indicted Trump in April 2023. The ENTIRE case was based on records from 2018 and earlier.

Bragg could have brought that case against Trump in 2021. Every piece of evidence used was already 3 years old at that time.

FAIL.

What you keep ignoring is the process.
The business records were false, but standing on their own, there is no way of knowing that. They were false because of being put under a business deduction, instead of a personal expense.
They could only subpoena Trump's business records for just cause, and not for a fishing expedition, which means they had to have some proof that the business records were illegally legered.

A district attorney (DA) or other prosecutor can issue a subpoena in New York State to compel a witness to appear in court or to produce documents. To get a subpoena, a DA needs to apply for it and have it signed by a judge.

That evidence came from Trump's tax returns.