Of course, as he was a threat to them, when that strategy was written. Who can blame them? They were tired of reacting to attacks from the death cult.
Moron, Iraq never attacked Israel.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course, as he was a threat to them, when that strategy was written. Who can blame them? They were tired of reacting to attacks from the death cult.
Look in the mirror.Damn, you're really ignorant.
Subsequent events seem to have "changed everything" about your original thread:Glad this two-year-old OP of mine has re-ignited some interest.
One person's "terror" is another person's fight for freedom. I prefer to determine that distinction at home (US) and let others determine it for themselves. How long should/can we intervene in Ukraine (and Israel)?The “War Against Terror” will never end so long as adventurist and unsustainable U.S. military interventions and occupations continue abroad.
I never said or implied that they did.Moron, Iraq never attacked Israel.
Turning the Lefts hero over was nonnegotiable.There is long-ignored evidence that the Taliban was willing to give up Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, both before and after 9/11, but that the U.S. refused — because our leaders were arrogant and wanted war.
These two articles from 2001 and 2004 should — like the lack of “Weapons of Mass Destruction” in Iraq — make people question our real aim in overthrowing the Taliban.
(Elsewhere I have emphasized our own culpability in arming the Mujaheddin jihadis and working with Islamic terrorists like Bin Laden in the first place.)
What do YOU think our real aim was in sending our troops into Afghanistan and Iraq?
Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over
How Bush Was Offered Bin Laden and Blew It - CounterPunch.org
Actually you need to ask Hillary Clinton John Brennan and Joe Biden about what really happened to Osama bin Laden and Seal team 6.Turning the Lefts hero over was nonnegotiable.
No big deal to me.
Kind of like the situation in Gaza. Surrender or die.
That's complete bullshit from notorious fake news sources. The US was not preventing anyone from turning in or killing bin Laden. In fact there was a multi-million dollar reward on his head.There is long-ignored evidence that the Taliban was willing to give up Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, both before and after 9/11, but that the U.S. refused — because our leaders were arrogant and wanted war.
These two articles from 2001 and 2004 should — like the lack of “Weapons of Mass Destruction” in Iraq — make people question our real aim in overthrowing the Taliban.
(Elsewhere I have emphasized our own culpability in arming the Mujaheddin jihadis and working with Islamic terrorists like Bin Laden in the first place.)
What do YOU think our real aim was in sending our troops into Afghanistan and Iraq?
Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over
How Bush Was Offered Bin Laden and Blew It - CounterPunch.org
Bullshit.That's complete bullshit from notorious fake news sources. The US was not preventing anyone from turning in or killing bin Laden. In fact there was a multi-million dollar reward on his head.
Furthermore, there were WMD found in Iraq, including Sarin, Tabun and Ricin. Not only that, AQ also controlled territory in northern Iraq, established a Salafist caliphate there and had a chemical weapons facility in Sargat.
Bush 43 went to war in Afghanistan and escalated the war in Iraq to kill AQ forces and take down the Hussein regime once and for all. Plain and simple.
There is long-ignored evidence that the Taliban was willing to give up Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, both before and after 9/11, but that the U.S. refused — because our leaders were arrogant and wanted war.
These two articles from 2001 and 2004 should — like the lack of “Weapons of Mass Destruction” in Iraq — make people question our real aim in overthrowing the Taliban.
(Elsewhere I have emphasized our own culpability in arming the Mujaheddin jihadis and working with Islamic terrorists like Bin Laden in the first place.)
What do YOU think our real aim was in sending our troops into Afghanistan and Iraq?
Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over
How Bush Was Offered Bin Laden and Blew It - CounterPunch.org
Afghanistan was for ENRON.That's complete bullshit from notorious fake news sources. The US was not preventing anyone from turning in or killing bin Laden. In fact there was a multi-million dollar reward on his head.
Furthermore, there were WMD found in Iraq, including Sarin, Tabun and Ricin. Not only that, AQ also controlled territory in northern Iraq, established a Salafist caliphate there and had a chemical weapons facility in Sargat.
Bush 43 went to war in Afghanistan and escalated the war in Iraq to kill AQ forces and take down the Hussein regime once and for all. Plain and simple.