RodISHI
Platinum Member
- Nov 29, 2008
- 25,786
- 11,298
- 940
You might want to write somewhat differently so as to dispel that notion.The sacrifice does not mean to take away the human life. It never has unless you have a twisted mind. That sacrificial Lamb is one within the human/adam. It is the portion that each must determine to give up within themselves when they are called forth by the holy spirit. To eat the flesh of Jesus is to consume the holy words that are spoken/written by the spirit. These words feed the mind where the spirit resides.
Their is no escape in the flesh as once joined to the Body of Christ but we are assured that our souls our saved; one also accepts that they will take up their own cross and follow in the footsteps of Jesus.
The law still exist and judgment takes place right here in the flesh of this world. The chosen of the God know that they are and will be subjected right along with those whom they desire that their souls should be saved from certain death and they agree to this before being sent into this world where the enemies of God also reside in the flesh of the world. The really cool part if it all is that the people in this world can reject those evil and wicked things and will have a great deal of help (spiritually speaking) in doing so when they accept the call for the 'anointing of Jehovah's salvation with them' aka 'Jesus Christ'.
I agree that all that occurs in scriptures are to be thought of as happening in our own minds.
Remember please that I wrote the O.P. for the less enlightened than you and I.
You almost sound like you believe in the supernatural. You might want to write somewhat differently so as to dispel that notion.
Regards
DL
If you do not believe that the King of kings cannot step out of what we mere mortals consider thin air you may wish to rethink your position. Tell me if He was standing in front of you would you actually know that he manifested in the flesh to speak to you?
If that man could not prove himself, then I would think him insane for making statements about the supernatural that he cannot back up. I would also question him as to the really poor moral tenets that were put into his mouth. A deity cannot be immoral and Jesus is shown to be.
I especially dislike his no divorce policy as well as his substitutional punishment policies.
This clip speak of other poor moral tenets.
I think all these points valid and given the number of Christians who will not engage in moral discussions of any kind, I think they know that the morals put into Jesus' mouth are garbage and that they cannot justify them.
Care to engage in a moral discussion?
Regards
DL
.
Your video is flawed from the get go as Jesus did not claim to be God.
Your desiring to play devil's advocate some more?
If so set the ground rules and I may be willing to discuss 'morals' with you if (that is if it doesn't get to wild).
I am well aware that Jesus never claimed to be God, but Christians have made him God with their stupid Trinity concept.
If you wish to discuss morals, look at the post just above where I replied to a question on divorce and substitutional punishment that Christians have to buy into to be saved.
Regards
DL.
If a person stays with an abusive spouse they are punishing themselves aren't they?
Why would that which is holy dedicated to be a Son of God stay in the forefront where it is not desired nor wanted? Wouldn't that be what you could call a separation/divorce from the perps/pervs/blasphemer/(insert any abomination which are parts pieces and portions of that son of perdition) who refuses to regard its own (guilty) conscience?
Bill of divorce Jeremiah 3:8
Last edited: