rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,009
- 157,745
No, the internet needs to be regulated
Spoken like a true Conservative
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
No, the internet needs to be regulated
Who cares. Why do democrats feel they need to silence people. Seems fascist to me.The election has been over for six weeks ....why are Republicans still spreading lies?
They do not have that right without giving up their protections. They act as publishers right now but are not regulated like EVERY OTHER PUBLISHER.Protecting every Americans first amendment CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS is the antithesis of authoritarian.Now you are arguing for authoritarian big government actions to address this still?
Your first amendment right does not apply when using Farsebook and Twatter and they have every right to remove and block content just like USMB, but you and those like you will disagree and believe you should be allow to post anything you deem appropriate even when it is not...
It's an ongoing process.Whats the goal here?
Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?
Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?
Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?
Seriously can't say this loud enough....
FUCK THESE COMPANIES!
No, the internet needs to be regulated under the FCC as a public square because THATS WHAT IT IS.Protecting every Americans first amendment CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS is the antithesis of authoritarian.Now you are arguing for authoritarian big government actions to address this still?
You need to take a class on the 1st Amendment and stop being a hypocrite on your support for big authoritarian governments.
They do not have that right without giving up their protections. They act as publishers right now but are not regulated like EVERY OTHER PUBLISHER.Protecting every Americans first amendment CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS is the antithesis of authoritarian.Now you are arguing for authoritarian big government actions to address this still?
Your first amendment right does not apply when using Farsebook and Twatter and they have every right to remove and block content just like USMB, but you and those like you will disagree and believe you should be allow to post anything you deem appropriate even when it is not...
Wrong.They do not have that right without giving up their protections. They act as publishers right now but are not regulated like EVERY OTHER PUBLISHER.Protecting every Americans first amendment CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS is the antithesis of authoritarian.Now you are arguing for authoritarian big government actions to address this still?
Your first amendment right does not apply when using Farsebook and Twatter and they have every right to remove and block content just like USMB, but you and those like you will disagree and believe you should be allow to post anything you deem appropriate even when it is not...
Feel grateful for the freedoms we still enjoy.
Our children will not have these freedoms.
Our grandchildren will not know these freedoms ever existed.
No, the internet needs to be regulated
Spoken like a true Conservative
Omfg the irony is so thick i don't think a chainsaw could cut it.No, the internet needs to be regulated
Spoken like a true Conservative
Again, he's not a conservative. He's a fruitcake Party of the Rumper John Bircher who believes that only they have the right to say who can and who can't say something. Conservatives don't buy into that.
The total goal is to have the population so GD dumb it is impossible for them to know the truth.Whats the goal here?
Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?
Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?
Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?
Seriously can't say this loud enough....
FUCK THESE COMPANIES!
censorship and thought crimes are a prelude to tyrannyWhats the goal here?
Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?
Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?
Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?
Seriously can't say this loud enough....
FUCK THESE COMPANIES!
My God. FB is a publically traded co. Not private.Protecting every Americans first amendment CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS is the antithesis of authoritarian.Now you are arguing for authoritarian big government actions to address this still?
Your first amendment right does not apply when using Farsebook and Twatter and they have every right to remove and block content just like USMB, but you and those like you will disagree and believe you should be allow to post anything you deem appropriate even when it is not...
I'm facing fact here. If I'm a liberal I will be able to say and do whatever I please, laws be damned. I can fuk Chinese spies, make up crooked Foundations...………...We're dumb fuks for not taking advantage. Just another angle to loo at.censorship and thought crimes are a prelude to tyrannyWhats the goal here?
Suppress anger from the right befor the runoff senate race?
Force congress to break them up/strip them of protections?
Think they can permanently control public discourse if they just keep the propaganda machine oiled with the fresh remains of the 1st amendment?
Seriously can't say this loud enough....
FUCK THESE COMPANIES!
the Dems are totalitarianist
The purveyors of 4 years of fake news are now the arbiters of real news.
Unreal
The purveyors of 4 years of fake news are now the arbiters of real news.
Unreal
here is a fitting message.