HistoryBefore67
Rookie
- Jun 10, 2013
- 600
- 65
- 0
- Banned
- #1
The Muslims claim that Jerusalem is one of their three holiest cities. They claim this despite the fact that there is no reference to Jerusalem in the Qur'an.
The justification: there is a passage in the Qur'an about the Prophet's "Night Journey" to the "Furthest Mosque." Muslims today claim this is a reference to Jerusalem.
This is a lie.
Here are some of the reasons why we know this is a lie:
1. During the time of the Prophet, Jerusalem had not yet been conquered by the Muslims and contained not a single mosque.
2. The "furthest mosque" was apparently identified with places inside Arabia: either Medina or a town called Ji'rana, about ten miles from Mecca, which the Prophet visited in 630.
3. The earliest Muslim accounts of Jerusalem, such as the description of Caliph 'Umar's reported visit to the city just after the Muslims conquest in 638, nowhere identify the Temple Mount with the "furthest mosque" of the Qur'an.
4. The Qur'anic inscriptions that make up a 240-meter mosaic frieze inside the Dome of the Rock do not include Qur'an 17:1 and the story of the Night Journey, suggesting that as late as 692 the idea of Jerusalem as the lift-off for the Night Journey had not yet been established. (Indeed, the first extant inscriptions of Qur'an 17:1 in Jerusalem date from the eleventh century.)
5. Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiya (638-700), a close relative of the Prophet, is quoted denigrating the notion that the prophet ever set foot on the Rock in Jerusalem; "these damned Syrians," by which he means the Umayyads, "pretend that God put His foot on the Rock in Jerusalem, though [only] one person ever put his foot on the rock, namely Abraham."
http://www.danielpipes.org/84/the-muslim-claim-to-jerusalem
The justification: there is a passage in the Qur'an about the Prophet's "Night Journey" to the "Furthest Mosque." Muslims today claim this is a reference to Jerusalem.
This is a lie.
Here are some of the reasons why we know this is a lie:
1. During the time of the Prophet, Jerusalem had not yet been conquered by the Muslims and contained not a single mosque.
2. The "furthest mosque" was apparently identified with places inside Arabia: either Medina or a town called Ji'rana, about ten miles from Mecca, which the Prophet visited in 630.
3. The earliest Muslim accounts of Jerusalem, such as the description of Caliph 'Umar's reported visit to the city just after the Muslims conquest in 638, nowhere identify the Temple Mount with the "furthest mosque" of the Qur'an.
4. The Qur'anic inscriptions that make up a 240-meter mosaic frieze inside the Dome of the Rock do not include Qur'an 17:1 and the story of the Night Journey, suggesting that as late as 692 the idea of Jerusalem as the lift-off for the Night Journey had not yet been established. (Indeed, the first extant inscriptions of Qur'an 17:1 in Jerusalem date from the eleventh century.)
5. Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiya (638-700), a close relative of the Prophet, is quoted denigrating the notion that the prophet ever set foot on the Rock in Jerusalem; "these damned Syrians," by which he means the Umayyads, "pretend that God put His foot on the Rock in Jerusalem, though [only] one person ever put his foot on the rock, namely Abraham."
http://www.danielpipes.org/84/the-muslim-claim-to-jerusalem
Last edited: