The history of global "warming": Has Al Gore seen this chart?

there WILL be another ice age


Is Antarctica an ice age?


If your answer is NO, please STFU and do not discredit the "skeptic" side anymore....
imageedit_877_4786993492.jpg
 
That is perhaps a bit exaggerated, but the polar bear population is increasing....
 
Do you dispute that there will be another ice age?


Antarctica is an ice age, retard. Ice ages are continent specific, because ice that grows out over water tends to BREAK OFF in the form of icebergs.

The more you just parrot instead of think, the more errors you make to keep Gore's fraud alive. Climate change is 90% plus about where land is. Antarctica 70 million years ago had dinosaurs roaming it, because it was not on the South Pole and not covered with ice.

In the past million years, North America thawed while Greenland froze. That is because "ice ages" are continent specific....
 
Do you dispute that there will be another ice age?


Antarctica is an ice age, retard. Ice ages are continent specific, because ice that grows out over water tends to BREAK OFF in the form of icebergs.

The more you just parrot instead of think, the more errors you make to keep Gore's fraud alive. Climate change is 90% plus about where land is. Antarctica 70 million years ago had dinosaurs roaming it, because it was not on the South Pole and not covered with ice.

In the past million years, North America thawed while Greenland froze. That is because "ice ages" are continent specific....

Goddamn you are dumb.
 
Goddamn you are dumb


Human parrots are like that. Refute their parroting, ask them questions, and you quickly find out they have no intelligence, no integrity, and nothing but hate when their parroting gets refuted.

Ice ages are continent specific. Just try to disprove that....
 
That settles it. paullitely says global warming isn't real.

NASA and every other major international scientific agency that has studies climate change are wrong.

Time to pack up and go home folks, no more to see here. Paullitely.com has spoken.


climate change is real. The OP proved that. Man made climate change is a hoax, the OP proved that as well.

the climate of planet earth has been changing for hundreds of millions of years and will be changing hundreds of millions of years from now. Man has never had anything to do with it.


And ignoring it means we are not preparing our coastal areas for high water, nor our interiors for wildfires, or violent storms. You guys say screw the infrastructure, and you HAVE.
 
As I said, the climate has been changing, ever since Earth has had a climate.

And man has had nothing to do with it.

Maybe we should tell the dinosaurs who roamed the earth in 320,000 BC to quit driving their gas-guzzling SUVs, and turn down their thermostats?

And the ones in 130,000 BC were nearly as bad.

Yet the liberal fanatics are convinced that man is the one who has messed up our climate.....


vostoktemp0-420000-bp-siberian-ice-core-temperature-record-shows-short-warm-periods-each-100000-years-with-ice-ages-in-between.gif


Thanks for the link, idiot. God knows whose chart this is or where it came from. You probably have a lot of fake news sites in your Favorites list, too.
 
And ignoring it means we are not preparing our coastal areas for high water,


Ocean levels are actually dropping, 100% because "the ice is not melting...."

Start with 90% of Earth's ice on Antarctica, which has added at least 80 billion tons of ice every year since Algore started lying and your sub human birdbrain started parroting...


NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses

" the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008."
 
This chart is made from data taken by scientists studying deep ice in Antarctica. It starts a little more than 400 million years ago. It shows estimated global temperatures, based on the best available data, compared to the temperatures we have nowadays.

Note the pattern.

Temperatures started around where they are today. Then they dropped rapidly, not the few tenths of a degree the present hysterics are telling us about, but going down 4 to 8 degrees C. And they stayed there for more than 60,000 years.

Then they rose suddenly, as much as 10 degrees C, but quickly dropped back down to the lower levels, and stayed low for another 80,000 years.

Then they rose again for a short time, but dropped back down and mostly stayed low for another 100,000 years.

Then they rose again briefly, but dropped back down and stayed low yet again for another 100,000 years.

Then they rose again, and have stayed for a brief period... which brings us to the present day.

Note that this repeated cycle, has happened over and over, without the hand of man going anywhere near the planet in any significant way. Would anyone like to support the idea that those greedy, wasteful humans were burning too much oil, a hundred thousand years ago when the previous peak occured? Maybe driving too many SUVs two hundred thousand years ago? Maybe a jurassic Al Gore was chartering huge jets all over the world 300,000 years ago, warning his fellow humans back then about the dangers of THAT period of "global warming"?

Al Gore and the rest of his junk-science salesmen want us to believe that we will see temperatures getting warmer from where they are, with no end in sight. And he proposes massive government expenditures, massive programs, and huge government restrictions and regulations on everything we do, to try to stop temperatures from warming in the future.

But based on previous patterns, where do YOU expect temperatures to go from here?

Has Al Gore seen this chart?
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

globalwarmchart400k.jpg
Al gore is full of shit...
 
Man caused global warming is a reality. We know that because folks like Leonardo DiCaprio say so.

One of his homes:
2bcd9f79f929127e89143b4971a938ae.jpg


His cool boat:
dicapriotopaz.jpg
Climate scientists/activists are nothing but hypocrites… fact
 
And ignoring it means we are not preparing our coastal areas for high water,


Ocean levels are actually dropping, 100% because "the ice is not melting...."

Start with 90% of Earth's ice on Antarctica, which has added at least 80 billion tons of ice every year since Algore started lying and your sub human birdbrain started parroting...


NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses

" the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008."

Read your own link.

“We’re essentially in agreement with other studies that show an increase in ice discharge in the Antarctic Peninsula and the Thwaites and Pine Island region of West Antarctica,” said Jay Zwally, a glaciologist with NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and lead author of the study, which was published on Oct. 30 in the Journal of Glaciology. “Our main disagreement is for East Antarctica and the interior of West Antarctica – there, we see an ice gain that exceeds the losses in the other areas.” Zwally added that his team “measured small height changes over large areas, as well as the large changes observed over smaller areas.”

But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally
. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
 
Goddamn you are dumb


Human parrots are like that. Refute their parroting, ask them questions, and you quickly find out they have no intelligence, no integrity, and nothing but hate when their parroting gets refuted.

Ice ages are continent specific. Just try to disprove that....

Translation your wife left you and you don't have a life, got it. :cuckoo:
 
That settles it. paullitely says global warming isn't real.

NASA and every other major international scientific agency that has studies climate change are wrong.

Time to pack up and go home folks, no more to see here. Paullitely.com has spoken.


climate change is real. The OP proved that. Man made climate change is a hoax, the OP proved that as well.

the climate of planet earth has been changing for hundreds of millions of years and will be changing hundreds of millions of years from now. Man has never had anything to do with it.


And ignoring it means we are not preparing our coastal areas for high water, nor our interiors for wildfires, or violent storms. You guys say screw the infrastructure, and you HAVE.
tell me, exactly what is it that can be done to save the coast from flooding if the ocean rises by a foot or so, lets pick New York City, how do we protect the city. My theory? move to higher ground, man is not winning this one.
 
That settles it. paullitely says global warming isn't real.

NASA and every other major international scientific agency that has studies climate change are wrong.

Time to pack up and go home folks, no more to see here. Paullitely.com has spoken.


climate change is real. The OP proved that. Man made climate change is a hoax, the OP proved that as well.

the climate of planet earth has been changing for hundreds of millions of years and will be changing hundreds of millions of years from now. Man has never had anything to do with it.

Absolutely. Paullitely.com is obviously the top authority on the topic. NASA is dead wrong on this.

Couldn't agree more.

Actually, if you're following along with the science news. MOST of that paulitely piece is correct. The part about dropping into a new Solar Minimum seems to be real and panning out. IN FACT -- NASA and other govt agencies can't rule it out. Maybe you should read a bit about the NATURAL variation that the Earth may soon demonstrate.

Doesn't mean the GW debate is over. But the propaganda will be much harder to push when the Thames and the Potomac are both frozen solid.. .
 
That settles it. paullitely says global warming isn't real.

NASA and every other major international scientific agency that has studies climate change are wrong.

Time to pack up and go home folks, no more to see here. Paullitely.com has spoken.


climate change is real. The OP proved that. Man made climate change is a hoax, the OP proved that as well.

the climate of planet earth has been changing for hundreds of millions of years and will be changing hundreds of millions of years from now. Man has never had anything to do with it.


And ignoring it means we are not preparing our coastal areas for high water, nor our interiors for wildfires, or violent storms. You guys say screw the infrastructure, and you HAVE.


Wrong, we should prepare as best we can for acts of nature. But to think we can control them is fantasy. To think that we can stop the earth from warming or cooling is the height of ignorance.

My problem with the libs on this is that they have created a false connection between pollution (a real problem) and climate. Why not attack the real problem?
 
As I said, the climate has been changing, ever since Earth has had a climate.

And man has had nothing to do with it.

Maybe we should tell the dinosaurs who roamed the earth in 320,000 BC to quit driving their gas-guzzling SUVs, and turn down their thermostats?

And the ones in 130,000 BC were nearly as bad.

Yet the liberal fanatics are convinced that man is the one who has messed up our climate.....


vostoktemp0-420000-bp-siberian-ice-core-temperature-record-shows-short-warm-periods-each-100000-years-with-ice-ages-in-between.gif
And your bona fides are? You really think that your ability to analyze the data exceeds that of scientists that have spent decades studying their discipline? You guys are a hoot.
 
This chart is made from data taken by scientists studying deep ice in Antarctica. It starts a little more than 400 million years ago. It shows estimated global temperatures, based on the best available data, compared to the temperatures we have nowadays.

Note the pattern.

Temperatures started around where they are today. Then they dropped rapidly, not the few tenths of a degree the present hysterics are telling us about, but going down 4 to 8 degrees C. And they stayed there for more than 60,000 years.

Then they rose suddenly, as much as 10 degrees C, but quickly dropped back down to the lower levels, and stayed low for another 80,000 years.

Then they rose again for a short time, but dropped back down and mostly stayed low for another 100,000 years.

Then they rose again briefly, but dropped back down and stayed low yet again for another 100,000 years.

Then they rose again, and have stayed for a brief period... which brings us to the present day.

Note that this repeated cycle, has happened over and over, without the hand of man going anywhere near the planet in any significant way. Would anyone like to support the idea that those greedy, wasteful humans were burning too much oil, a hundred thousand years ago when the previous peak occured? Maybe driving too many SUVs two hundred thousand years ago? Maybe a jurassic Al Gore was chartering huge jets all over the world 300,000 years ago, warning his fellow humans back then about the dangers of THAT period of "global warming"?

Al Gore and the rest of his junk-science salesmen want us to believe that we will see temperatures getting warmer from where they are, with no end in sight. And he proposes massive government expenditures, massive programs, and huge government restrictions and regulations on everything we do, to try to stop temperatures from warming in the future.

But based on previous patterns, where do YOU expect temperatures to go from here?

Has Al Gore seen this chart?
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

globalwarmchart400k.jpg
Al gore is full of shit...

Why? Because he agrees with 97% of scientist on this planet.
 

Forum List

Back
Top