The Law Your Propaganda Sites Are Not Telling You About

[g5000]

Those who are supporting Trump's Muslim ban have been citing 8 U.S. Code 1182(f). This is what their propaganda sites have told them to parrot.

What they have not been told is that there is another law which specifically states no one may be denied entry to the US based on their nationality or place of residence.

8 U.S. Code 1152. This is the law the courts have been citing, but you would not know that if you only listened to the Trump Chump propaganda sources.

Except as specifically provided in paragraph (2) and in sections1101(a)(27), 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), and 1153 of this title, no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

There is no Muslim ban you rube.

 

[TheOldSchool]

There is no Muslim ban you rube.

Well, not anymore now that it's been struck down

 

[g5000]

From the Libertarian Cato Institute:
Trump’s Immigration Ban Is Illegal

Nonetheless, Mr. Trump asserts that he still has the power to discriminate, pointing to a 1952 law that allows the president the ability to “suspend the entry” of “any class of aliens” that he finds are detrimental to the interest of the United States.

But the president ignores the fact that Congress then restricted this power in 1965, stating plainly that no person could be “discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth or place of residence.” The only exceptions are those provided for by Congress (such as the preference for Cuban asylum seekers).

When Congress passed the 1965 law, it wished to protect not just immigrants, but also American citizens, who should have the right to sponsor their family members or to marry a foreign-born spouse without being subject to pointless discrimination.

 

[nat4900]

There is no Muslim ban you rube.

"True".....the real fact that the ONLY people banned were Muslims is just a coincidence........LOL

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

There is no Muslim ban you rube.

But now it be stayed!

 

[Bleipriester]

Those who are supporting Trump's Muslim ban have been citing 8 U.S. Code 1182(f). This is what their propaganda sites have told them to parrot.

What they have not been told is that there is another law which specifically states no one may be denied entry to the US based on their nationality or place of residence.

8 U.S. Code 1152. This is the law the courts have been citing, but you would not know that if you only listened to the Trump Chump propaganda sources.

Except as specifically provided in paragraph (2) and in sections1101(a)(27), 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), and 1153 of this title, no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.

Congressional Research Service: "Executive Authority to Exclude Aliens: In Brief" | Presidents Of The United States | Federal Government Of The United States

 

[hadit]

There is no Muslim ban you rube.

"True".....the real fact that the ONLY people banned were Muslims is just a coincidence........LOL

Research what percent of Muslims were NOT impacted and get back to us. A "Muslim ban" bans Muslims. Something that does not impact the vast majority of a group is not a ban on that group.

But we all knew that. Please return to the predictable rant.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Those who are supporting Trump's Muslim ban have been citing 8 U.S. Code 1182(f). This is what their propaganda sites have told them to parrot.

What they have not been told is that there is another law which specifically states no one may be denied entry to the US based on their nationality or place of residence.

8 U.S. Code 1152. This is the law the courts have been citing, but you would not know that if you only listened to the Trump Chump propaganda sources.

Except as specifically provided in paragraph (2) and in sections1101(a)(27), 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), and 1153 of this title, no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.

It's not a Muslim ban, fuckwit

 

[Manonthestreet]

Libs conveniently forget 2 democrat Presidents have done same thing

 

[Fenton Lum]

Libs conveniently forget 2 democrat Presidents have done same thing

So have the so called "cons".

 

[hadit]

Libs conveniently forget 2 democrat Presidents have done same thing

You're not supposed to remember that.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Those who are supporting Trump's Muslim ban have been citing 8 U.S. Code 1182(f). This is what their propaganda sites have told them to parrot.

What they have not been told is that there is another law which specifically states no one may be denied entry to the US based on their nationality or place of residence.

8 U.S. Code 1152. This is the law the courts have been citing, but you would not know that if you only listened to the Trump Chump propaganda sources.

Except as specifically provided in paragraph (2) and in sections1101(a)(27), 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), and 1153 of this title, no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.

It's not a Muslim ban, fuckwit

It's not anything anymore LOL

 

[nat4900]

Something that does not impact the vast majority of a group is not a ban on that group.

Very good.....stick to that stupidity and try to "sell it" to ISIS' recruitment departments.....LOL

 

[my2¢]

Libs conveniently forget 2 democrat Presidents have done same thing

Attorneys general for Washington and Minnesota challenged Trump's executive order which is how it ended up in court. I'll only guess nobody challenged those previous 2?

 

[hadit]

Something that does not impact the vast majority of a group is not a ban on that group.

Very good.....stick to that stupidity and try to "sell it" to ISIS' recruitment departments.....LOL

Did you do your research?

 

[g5000]

There is no Muslim ban you rube.

"True".....the real fact that the ONLY people banned were Muslims is just a coincidence........LOL

Research what percent of Muslims were NOT impacted and get back to us. A "Muslim ban" bans Muslims. Something that does not impact the vast majority of a group is not a ban on that group.

But we all knew that. Please return to the predictable rant.

It's funny how you tards work so hard to paint all Muslims as future terrorists when a tiny minority commit terror, and now you are pretending to be all concerned-like the Muslim ban not be called a Muslim ban just because not all Muslims are affected by it.

 

[TooTall]

There is no Muslim ban you rube.

Well, not anymore now that it's been struck down

There never was a Muslim ban.

 

[Camp]

There is no Muslim ban you rube.

The ban became a Muslim ban when exceptions and waivers were made for Christians from the same counties in the original EO. Muslims were banned but Christians were not.

 

[nat4900]

and now you are pretending to be all concerned-like the Muslim ban not be called a Muslim ban just because not all Muslims are affected by it.

.....and all this "concern" from the same folks who INSISTED that Obama use the term "radical Islam"...Go figure.