OldLady
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 69,568
- 19,607
- 2,220
[
I just purchased a subscription to the online Times in order to read his damned essay. Yes, he calls for a massive military reaction to the rioting. If people didn't like what he said, they should be addressing their chagrin at HIM, not at the newspaper that published it! I see this as a massive p.c. reaction that is stifling opposing opinions for no good reason.
Most of you know that I am one of the few here that upholds curbing hate speech in our country. I am no rabid protector of free speech regardless of the message. But Cotton's opinion, as much as I disagree with it, does not ring of hatred. He is one of those "Law and Order" guys. Cotton's staff worked with the Times editorial staff extensively before they accepted the submission. Cotton's staff said they fact checked and documented the Senator's statements. It sounds to me as if most of America's leaders and even some military and police forces disagree with a that militaristic approach. THAT should be where the uproar lies, NOT TOWARD THE PAPER THAT PUBLISHED IT.
I remember when Maine had it's second referendum on legalizing gay marriage. (In the first go round, we voted it down. In 2012 we approved it.)
The Bangor Daily News in its op ed section published a strong editorial in favor of gay marriage and the following week it published a strong editorial opposing it by the religious leader who spearheaded the opposition to legalizing gay marriage. I found the argument pathetic, a lot of emotional and poorly argued bigotry, but it never occurred to me to blame the PAPER for publishing it.
What in hell is happening to us? No. This is not right. Blaming NYT for running that op ed, saying it shouldn't have, is as frightening to me as the Trumpers who call them "fake news." Senator Cotton has the right to his stupid opinion and as an elected official he has a right to express it, so long as it remains within the bounds of decency.
I'm including a link from Vox that gives all the reasons why NYT should not have published it. It sent chills up my spine. We are not that country, folks. I've seen what the NYT is now saying, how it should have been more careful and made him change more of his statements. It frightens me.
www.vox.com
I don't agree. He had the right to voice his opinion and his opinion is shared by a lot of people who are frightened of the violence and destruction of the riots. This is the first I've heard of this. Apparently the OP ED editor quit he was so disgusted. I don't blame him.Tom Cotton's racist rant went in the garbage where it belongs.
I just purchased a subscription to the online Times in order to read his damned essay. Yes, he calls for a massive military reaction to the rioting. If people didn't like what he said, they should be addressing their chagrin at HIM, not at the newspaper that published it! I see this as a massive p.c. reaction that is stifling opposing opinions for no good reason.
Most of you know that I am one of the few here that upholds curbing hate speech in our country. I am no rabid protector of free speech regardless of the message. But Cotton's opinion, as much as I disagree with it, does not ring of hatred. He is one of those "Law and Order" guys. Cotton's staff worked with the Times editorial staff extensively before they accepted the submission. Cotton's staff said they fact checked and documented the Senator's statements. It sounds to me as if most of America's leaders and even some military and police forces disagree with a that militaristic approach. THAT should be where the uproar lies, NOT TOWARD THE PAPER THAT PUBLISHED IT.
I remember when Maine had it's second referendum on legalizing gay marriage. (In the first go round, we voted it down. In 2012 we approved it.)
The Bangor Daily News in its op ed section published a strong editorial in favor of gay marriage and the following week it published a strong editorial opposing it by the religious leader who spearheaded the opposition to legalizing gay marriage. I found the argument pathetic, a lot of emotional and poorly argued bigotry, but it never occurred to me to blame the PAPER for publishing it.
What in hell is happening to us? No. This is not right. Blaming NYT for running that op ed, saying it shouldn't have, is as frightening to me as the Trumpers who call them "fake news." Senator Cotton has the right to his stupid opinion and as an elected official he has a right to express it, so long as it remains within the bounds of decency.
I'm including a link from Vox that gives all the reasons why NYT should not have published it. It sent chills up my spine. We are not that country, folks. I've seen what the NYT is now saying, how it should have been more careful and made him change more of his statements. It frightens me.
![www.vox.com](https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/dVnuchThJUUYA-IStupIQCKGs7Q=/0x429:3000x2000/fit-in/1200x630/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/20024060/GettyImages_1181055318.jpg)
The Tom Cotton op-ed affair shows why the media must defend America’s values
It cannot remain neutral when those values are under threat from racialized authoritarianism.
![www.vox.com](https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/community_logos/52517/voxv.png)